基于在线消费者评论影响老年人选择牙科护理提供者的因素

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Amal Ponathil, A. Khasawneh, Kaileigh A. Byrne, Kapil Chalil Madathil
{"title":"基于在线消费者评论影响老年人选择牙科护理提供者的因素","authors":"Amal Ponathil, A. Khasawneh, Kaileigh A. Byrne, Kapil Chalil Madathil","doi":"10.1080/24725579.2020.1854394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: The percentage of patients relying on information provided by their peers in the form of consumer reviews rather than the information found in healthcare reports from federal agencies is expected to increase. To encourage the use of these healthcare reports, which contain data from a more representative sample, several researchers have suggested incorporating consumer reviews in them. Objective: This study aims to identify the factors in online consumer reviews that affect the decisions of healthcare consumers as they choose their providers. Method: We recruited 310 participants through Qualtrics Research Services to participate in a 3*2*2*2 within-subjects study. We used the dentistry domain to test the effect of the valence of the review, the staff rating, the facility cleanliness rating and the dentist’s bedside manner rating on patient's trust in the information, the decision to choose a dentist and the confidence in the decision. Results: The findings suggest that valence of the review, the dentist’s bedside manner rating and the cleanliness rating of the facility significantly influence the consumer’s decision to choose a dentist and their trust in the information. In addition, the staff rating was considered the least important element in the consumer reviews. Conclusion: We conclude that in addition to narratives of patient experience in the form of reviews, consumer ratings like bedside manner and cleanliness are important cues that aid the consumer’s decision-making process while ratings such as a staff rating, which do not consider the interactions with the actual healthcare provider, are not as critical. Highlights Factors were identified in online reviews that affect consumer decisions of healthcare providers. A 3*2*2*2 within-subjects study was conducted based on the dentistry domain. Narratives of patient experiences in the form of reviews and consumer ratings of bedside manner and cleanliness were found to be important cues in a consumer’s decision. Staff ratings which do not consider the interactions with the healthcare provider were not as critical.","PeriodicalId":37744,"journal":{"name":"IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering","volume":"11 1","pages":"51 - 69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24725579.2020.1854394","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors affecting the choice of a dental care provider by older adults based on online consumer reviews\",\"authors\":\"Amal Ponathil, A. Khasawneh, Kaileigh A. Byrne, Kapil Chalil Madathil\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24725579.2020.1854394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background: The percentage of patients relying on information provided by their peers in the form of consumer reviews rather than the information found in healthcare reports from federal agencies is expected to increase. To encourage the use of these healthcare reports, which contain data from a more representative sample, several researchers have suggested incorporating consumer reviews in them. Objective: This study aims to identify the factors in online consumer reviews that affect the decisions of healthcare consumers as they choose their providers. Method: We recruited 310 participants through Qualtrics Research Services to participate in a 3*2*2*2 within-subjects study. We used the dentistry domain to test the effect of the valence of the review, the staff rating, the facility cleanliness rating and the dentist’s bedside manner rating on patient's trust in the information, the decision to choose a dentist and the confidence in the decision. Results: The findings suggest that valence of the review, the dentist’s bedside manner rating and the cleanliness rating of the facility significantly influence the consumer’s decision to choose a dentist and their trust in the information. In addition, the staff rating was considered the least important element in the consumer reviews. Conclusion: We conclude that in addition to narratives of patient experience in the form of reviews, consumer ratings like bedside manner and cleanliness are important cues that aid the consumer’s decision-making process while ratings such as a staff rating, which do not consider the interactions with the actual healthcare provider, are not as critical. Highlights Factors were identified in online reviews that affect consumer decisions of healthcare providers. A 3*2*2*2 within-subjects study was conducted based on the dentistry domain. Narratives of patient experiences in the form of reviews and consumer ratings of bedside manner and cleanliness were found to be important cues in a consumer’s decision. Staff ratings which do not consider the interactions with the healthcare provider were not as critical.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"51 - 69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24725579.2020.1854394\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725579.2020.1854394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725579.2020.1854394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景:患者依赖于其同行以消费者评论的形式提供的信息,而不是从联邦机构的医疗报告中发现的信息的百分比预计将增加。为了鼓励使用这些包含更具代表性样本数据的医疗保健报告,一些研究人员建议将消费者评论纳入其中。目的:本研究旨在确定在线消费者评论中影响医疗保健消费者选择供应商决策的因素。方法:通过qualics Research Services招募310名受试者,采用3*2*2*2的受试者内研究。我们使用牙科领域来测试评价的效价、工作人员评价、设施清洁度评价和牙医的床边态度评价对患者对信息的信任、选择牙医的决定和对决定的信心的影响。结果:调查结果表明,评价的效价、牙医的床边态度评级和设施的清洁度评级显著影响消费者选择牙医的决定和他们对信息的信任。此外,员工评级被认为是消费者评论中最不重要的因素。结论:我们得出的结论是,除了以评论的形式叙述患者体验之外,像床边态度和清洁度这样的消费者评级是帮助消费者决策过程的重要线索,而像员工评级这样的评级,不考虑与实际医疗保健提供者的互动,不是那么重要。在在线评论中确定了影响医疗保健提供者的消费者决策的因素。基于牙科领域进行3*2*2*2的受试者内研究。以评论和消费者对床边态度和清洁度的评分形式叙述的患者经历被发现是消费者决定的重要线索。不考虑与医疗保健提供者互动的工作人员评级不那么重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors affecting the choice of a dental care provider by older adults based on online consumer reviews
Abstract Background: The percentage of patients relying on information provided by their peers in the form of consumer reviews rather than the information found in healthcare reports from federal agencies is expected to increase. To encourage the use of these healthcare reports, which contain data from a more representative sample, several researchers have suggested incorporating consumer reviews in them. Objective: This study aims to identify the factors in online consumer reviews that affect the decisions of healthcare consumers as they choose their providers. Method: We recruited 310 participants through Qualtrics Research Services to participate in a 3*2*2*2 within-subjects study. We used the dentistry domain to test the effect of the valence of the review, the staff rating, the facility cleanliness rating and the dentist’s bedside manner rating on patient's trust in the information, the decision to choose a dentist and the confidence in the decision. Results: The findings suggest that valence of the review, the dentist’s bedside manner rating and the cleanliness rating of the facility significantly influence the consumer’s decision to choose a dentist and their trust in the information. In addition, the staff rating was considered the least important element in the consumer reviews. Conclusion: We conclude that in addition to narratives of patient experience in the form of reviews, consumer ratings like bedside manner and cleanliness are important cues that aid the consumer’s decision-making process while ratings such as a staff rating, which do not consider the interactions with the actual healthcare provider, are not as critical. Highlights Factors were identified in online reviews that affect consumer decisions of healthcare providers. A 3*2*2*2 within-subjects study was conducted based on the dentistry domain. Narratives of patient experiences in the form of reviews and consumer ratings of bedside manner and cleanliness were found to be important cues in a consumer’s decision. Staff ratings which do not consider the interactions with the healthcare provider were not as critical.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering
IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering aims to foster the healthcare systems community by publishing high quality papers that have a strong methodological focus and direct applicability to healthcare systems. Published quarterly, the journal supports research that explores: · Healthcare Operations Management · Medical Decision Making · Socio-Technical Systems Analysis related to healthcare · Quality Engineering · Healthcare Informatics · Healthcare Policy We are looking forward to accepting submissions that document the development and use of industrial and systems engineering tools and techniques including: · Healthcare operations research · Healthcare statistics · Healthcare information systems · Healthcare work measurement · Human factors/ergonomics applied to healthcare systems Research that explores the integration of these tools and techniques with those from other engineering and medical disciplines are also featured. We encourage the submission of clinical notes, or practice notes, to show the impact of contributions that will be published. We also encourage authors to collect an impact statement from their clinical partners to show the impact of research in the clinical practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信