模范联盟?美澳合作的战略逻辑

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
A. Carr
{"title":"模范联盟?美澳合作的战略逻辑","authors":"A. Carr","doi":"10.1080/0163660X.2021.2017645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In September 2021, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States captured the world’s attention with a technology and capability-sharing partnership known as AUKUS. For many, this was yet another example of the closeness of the alliance between the United States and Australia, which was initially formalized in the 1951 Australia, New Zealand, United States Security Treaty (ANZUS), from which New Zealand was suspended in 1986. Yet, however strong the public narrative seems, American and Australian officials have expressed concern and confusion about each other’s behavior in recent years, and well-connected scholars have warned of “complacency” and “expectation gaps” while identifying divergences in the interests, behavior, and outlook of the United States and Australia. During the 2010s, Australia regularly acted in ways that belied its loyal ally identity. Canberra consistently rejected US pressure to conduct Freedom of Navigation Operations (FONOPS) in the South China Sea. It ignored direct US pressure and joined China’s Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), agreed to a Free Trade Agreement with Beijing, and signed an MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) to support the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in the Indo-Pacific. Canberra was privately skeptical about the US commitment to its region under presidents Barack Obama as well as Joe Biden, and explicitly","PeriodicalId":46957,"journal":{"name":"Washington Quarterly","volume":"44 1","pages":"51 - 66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Model Alliance? The Strategic Logic of US-Australia Cooperation\",\"authors\":\"A. Carr\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0163660X.2021.2017645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In September 2021, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States captured the world’s attention with a technology and capability-sharing partnership known as AUKUS. For many, this was yet another example of the closeness of the alliance between the United States and Australia, which was initially formalized in the 1951 Australia, New Zealand, United States Security Treaty (ANZUS), from which New Zealand was suspended in 1986. Yet, however strong the public narrative seems, American and Australian officials have expressed concern and confusion about each other’s behavior in recent years, and well-connected scholars have warned of “complacency” and “expectation gaps” while identifying divergences in the interests, behavior, and outlook of the United States and Australia. During the 2010s, Australia regularly acted in ways that belied its loyal ally identity. Canberra consistently rejected US pressure to conduct Freedom of Navigation Operations (FONOPS) in the South China Sea. It ignored direct US pressure and joined China’s Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), agreed to a Free Trade Agreement with Beijing, and signed an MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) to support the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in the Indo-Pacific. Canberra was privately skeptical about the US commitment to its region under presidents Barack Obama as well as Joe Biden, and explicitly\",\"PeriodicalId\":46957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Washington Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"51 - 66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Washington Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2021.2017645\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Washington Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2021.2017645","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

2021年9月,澳大利亚、英国和美国建立了名为AUKUS的技术和能力共享伙伴关系,引起了全世界的关注。对许多人来说,这是美国和澳大利亚之间紧密联盟的又一个例子,这种联盟最初是在1951年的《澳大利亚、新西兰、美国安全条约》中正式确立的,新西兰于1986年被暂停加入该条约。然而,无论公共叙事看起来多么强烈,美国和澳大利亚官员近年来都对彼此的行为表示了担忧和困惑,关系密切的学者在指出美国和澳大利亚在利益、行为和前景上的分歧时,警告了“自满”和“期望差距”。在2010年代,澳大利亚经常表现出与其忠诚盟友身份不符的行为。堪培拉一直拒绝美国在南中国海进行自由航行行动(FONOPS)的压力。它不顾美国的直接压力,加入了中国的亚洲基础设施投资银行(AIIB),与北京达成了一项自由贸易协定,并签署了一份谅解备忘录(MOU),以支持印度太平洋地区的“一带一路”倡议(BRI)。堪培拉私下对巴拉克•奥巴马(Barack Obama)和乔•拜登(Joe Biden)领导下的美国对该地区的承诺持怀疑态度,而且态度明确
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Model Alliance? The Strategic Logic of US-Australia Cooperation
In September 2021, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States captured the world’s attention with a technology and capability-sharing partnership known as AUKUS. For many, this was yet another example of the closeness of the alliance between the United States and Australia, which was initially formalized in the 1951 Australia, New Zealand, United States Security Treaty (ANZUS), from which New Zealand was suspended in 1986. Yet, however strong the public narrative seems, American and Australian officials have expressed concern and confusion about each other’s behavior in recent years, and well-connected scholars have warned of “complacency” and “expectation gaps” while identifying divergences in the interests, behavior, and outlook of the United States and Australia. During the 2010s, Australia regularly acted in ways that belied its loyal ally identity. Canberra consistently rejected US pressure to conduct Freedom of Navigation Operations (FONOPS) in the South China Sea. It ignored direct US pressure and joined China’s Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), agreed to a Free Trade Agreement with Beijing, and signed an MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) to support the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in the Indo-Pacific. Canberra was privately skeptical about the US commitment to its region under presidents Barack Obama as well as Joe Biden, and explicitly
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Washington Quarterly (TWQ) is a journal of global affairs that analyzes strategic security challenges, changes, and their public policy implications. TWQ is published out of one of the world"s preeminent international policy institutions, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and addresses topics such as: •The U.S. role in the world •Emerging great powers: Europe, China, Russia, India, and Japan •Regional issues and flashpoints, particularly in the Middle East and Asia •Weapons of mass destruction proliferation and missile defenses •Global perspectives to reduce terrorism Contributors are drawn from outside as well as inside the United States and reflect diverse political, regional, and professional perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信