预防成人纵火犯再犯教育方案的成果评估

IF 0.5 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Dominic A. S. Pearson, Samuel Hayward, Shane Blampied
{"title":"预防成人纵火犯再犯教育方案的成果评估","authors":"Dominic A. S. Pearson, Samuel Hayward, Shane Blampied","doi":"10.1108/jcrpp-06-2021-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIn intervening to prevent recidivism by adult firesetters, there is a dearth of standardised interventions and relatedly of controlled outcome evaluations. Although education is a common firesetter intervention, it is unclear if this changes behaviour of adults; a research situation the current study aimed to address.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe rate of actual fire recidivism of participants of a standardised educational programme was compared using Cooke’s (1989) equation to expected rates based on the firesetting history of 93 referrals.\n\n\nFindings\nResults indicated a significant large effect for the difference between the frequencies of expected and actual firesetting re-offences.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nLimitations of the one-group pretest–posttest design are discussed with respect to potential confounds.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis paper adds to the literature on adult firesetter interventions and lends support to the use of fire education to prevent fire recidivism. It provides the first empirically validated example of a structured education programme for adult firesetters. Of interest to services piloting new intervention programmes, it reports an operationally efficient methodology for preliminary evaluation.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first reported outcome study of a fire safety education programme for adults. The methodology adopted represents a means of preliminary evaluation in safety-critical areas where traditional evaluation designs are infeasible.\n","PeriodicalId":43553,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminological Research Policy and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome evaluation of an educational programme for preventing recidivism by adult firesetters\",\"authors\":\"Dominic A. S. Pearson, Samuel Hayward, Shane Blampied\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jcrpp-06-2021-0030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nIn intervening to prevent recidivism by adult firesetters, there is a dearth of standardised interventions and relatedly of controlled outcome evaluations. Although education is a common firesetter intervention, it is unclear if this changes behaviour of adults; a research situation the current study aimed to address.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe rate of actual fire recidivism of participants of a standardised educational programme was compared using Cooke’s (1989) equation to expected rates based on the firesetting history of 93 referrals.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nResults indicated a significant large effect for the difference between the frequencies of expected and actual firesetting re-offences.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nLimitations of the one-group pretest–posttest design are discussed with respect to potential confounds.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThis paper adds to the literature on adult firesetter interventions and lends support to the use of fire education to prevent fire recidivism. It provides the first empirically validated example of a structured education programme for adult firesetters. Of interest to services piloting new intervention programmes, it reports an operationally efficient methodology for preliminary evaluation.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first reported outcome study of a fire safety education programme for adults. The methodology adopted represents a means of preliminary evaluation in safety-critical areas where traditional evaluation designs are infeasible.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Criminological Research Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Criminological Research Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcrpp-06-2021-0030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminological Research Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcrpp-06-2021-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在预防成年纵火犯再犯的干预中,缺乏标准化的干预措施和相关的控制结果评估。尽管教育是一种常见的点火干预措施,但尚不清楚这是否会改变成年人的行为;当前研究旨在解决的研究状况。设计/方法/方法使用Cooke(1989)方程将标准化教育计划参与者的实际火灾累犯率与基于93名转介的火灾历史的预期发生率进行比较。研究结果表明,预期和实际纵火再犯频率之间的差异有很大的影响。研究局限性/含义讨论了一组前测-后测设计的潜在混杂因素的局限性。实际意义本文增加了关于成人消防员干预的文献,并支持使用消防教育来预防火灾累犯。它提供了第一个经过实证验证的成人消防员结构化教育计划的例子。关于试行新干预方案的服务部门的兴趣,它报告了一种有效运作的初步评估方法。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是首次报道的成人消防安全教育计划的成果研究。所采用的方法是在传统评估设计不可行的安全关键领域进行初步评估的一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcome evaluation of an educational programme for preventing recidivism by adult firesetters
Purpose In intervening to prevent recidivism by adult firesetters, there is a dearth of standardised interventions and relatedly of controlled outcome evaluations. Although education is a common firesetter intervention, it is unclear if this changes behaviour of adults; a research situation the current study aimed to address. Design/methodology/approach The rate of actual fire recidivism of participants of a standardised educational programme was compared using Cooke’s (1989) equation to expected rates based on the firesetting history of 93 referrals. Findings Results indicated a significant large effect for the difference between the frequencies of expected and actual firesetting re-offences. Research limitations/implications Limitations of the one-group pretest–posttest design are discussed with respect to potential confounds. Practical implications This paper adds to the literature on adult firesetter interventions and lends support to the use of fire education to prevent fire recidivism. It provides the first empirically validated example of a structured education programme for adult firesetters. Of interest to services piloting new intervention programmes, it reports an operationally efficient methodology for preliminary evaluation. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first reported outcome study of a fire safety education programme for adults. The methodology adopted represents a means of preliminary evaluation in safety-critical areas where traditional evaluation designs are infeasible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信