诗意正义中的公共利益

Q2 Social Sciences
S. K. Katyal
{"title":"诗意正义中的公共利益","authors":"S. K. Katyal","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/er9s5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, for a symposium on the intersection of art and law, I explore the artist Felix Gonzalez Torres’ work in relation to a concept that we often focus on in property law, the idea of a “public good,” and how it can relate to the powerful conceptual work that his artistic legacy offers us. Here, I suggest using the concept of a public good as a metaphor for thinking about Felix Gonzalez Torres’ work in three potential ways. First, I use the economic framework of a public good to demonstrate the ways in which his work underscored and also challenged the notion of a singular intellectual property. Second, as I argue in Part II, using a non-market framework, his work also illuminates the concept of a public good in a philosophical sense because his work illuminates the kind of ideal, utopian terrain that law often strives to achieve. Third, I highlight Gonzalez Torres’ work, not in terms of how his work represents a public good, but rather how a decentralized notion of a public good, in both moral and market terms, personifies the legacy of the artist himself. Much of his work reworked the notion of advertising and consumption to use the concept of originality to focus on the way that identities circulated in modern contemporary culture. By reworking classic imagery, Gonzalez Torres also, ironically, forcibly reclaimed the perspectives of those who are often missing from mainstream representations. \nHis work, in many ways, illustrates why it is so important to study the relationships between art and property, between audience and artist, between the visual image and narrative form, between the space between reality and the ideal. His work directs us to study the text or the picture that is created and the meaning that it is supposed to produce—and the space between how that meaning is communicated, and how that meaning is received by the audience. In this article, it is that space—the space between the artist’s intent and the audience’s interpretation—that I want to focus on here, because I believe that the work of Felix Gonzalez Torres carries important lessons for those of us who care, not just about social justice and conceptual art, but who also care about creating a world that enables a multiplicity of interpretations, particularly in the age of new media.","PeriodicalId":39833,"journal":{"name":"Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy","volume":"26 1","pages":"497-516"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Public Good in Poetic Justice\",\"authors\":\"S. K. Katyal\",\"doi\":\"10.31228/osf.io/er9s5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, for a symposium on the intersection of art and law, I explore the artist Felix Gonzalez Torres’ work in relation to a concept that we often focus on in property law, the idea of a “public good,” and how it can relate to the powerful conceptual work that his artistic legacy offers us. Here, I suggest using the concept of a public good as a metaphor for thinking about Felix Gonzalez Torres’ work in three potential ways. First, I use the economic framework of a public good to demonstrate the ways in which his work underscored and also challenged the notion of a singular intellectual property. Second, as I argue in Part II, using a non-market framework, his work also illuminates the concept of a public good in a philosophical sense because his work illuminates the kind of ideal, utopian terrain that law often strives to achieve. Third, I highlight Gonzalez Torres’ work, not in terms of how his work represents a public good, but rather how a decentralized notion of a public good, in both moral and market terms, personifies the legacy of the artist himself. Much of his work reworked the notion of advertising and consumption to use the concept of originality to focus on the way that identities circulated in modern contemporary culture. By reworking classic imagery, Gonzalez Torres also, ironically, forcibly reclaimed the perspectives of those who are often missing from mainstream representations. \\nHis work, in many ways, illustrates why it is so important to study the relationships between art and property, between audience and artist, between the visual image and narrative form, between the space between reality and the ideal. His work directs us to study the text or the picture that is created and the meaning that it is supposed to produce—and the space between how that meaning is communicated, and how that meaning is received by the audience. In this article, it is that space—the space between the artist’s intent and the audience’s interpretation—that I want to focus on here, because I believe that the work of Felix Gonzalez Torres carries important lessons for those of us who care, not just about social justice and conceptual art, but who also care about creating a world that enables a multiplicity of interpretations, particularly in the age of new media.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"497-516\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/er9s5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/er9s5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,在一个关于艺术与法律交叉的研讨会上,我探讨了艺术家Felix Gonzalez Torres的作品与我们在财产法中经常关注的一个概念,“公共产品”的概念,以及它如何与他的艺术遗产为我们提供的强大的概念作品联系起来,我建议用公共产品的概念作为隐喻,从三个潜在的方面来思考费利克斯·冈萨雷斯-托雷斯的作品。首先,我用公共产品的经济框架来展示他的工作强调并挑战单一知识产权概念的方式。其次,正如我在第二部分中所说,使用非市场框架,他的作品也阐明了哲学意义上的公共产品概念,因为他的作品阐明了法律经常努力实现的理想、乌托邦地形。第三,我强调冈萨雷斯-托雷斯的作品,不是从他的作品如何代表公共利益的角度,而是从道德和市场的角度,去中心化的公共利益概念如何将艺术家本人的遗产人格化。他的大部分作品重新设计了广告和消费的概念,使用创意的概念来关注身份在现代现代文化中的传播方式。具有讽刺意味的是,冈萨雷斯-托雷斯通过重新塑造经典形象,强行收回了那些经常在主流表现中缺失的人的观点。他的作品在很多方面说明了为什么研究艺术与财产、观众与艺术家、视觉形象与叙事形式、现实与理想之间的空间之间的关系如此重要。他的作品指导我们研究所创造的文本或画面,以及它应该产生的意义——以及这种意义是如何传达的,以及观众如何接受这种意义之间的空间。在这篇文章中,我想在这里关注的是这个空间——艺术家意图和观众解释之间的空间,因为我相信费利克斯·冈萨雷斯-托雷斯的作品为我们这些不仅关心社会正义和概念艺术,而且关心创造一个能够进行多种解释的世界的人带来了重要的教训,尤其是在新媒体时代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Public Good in Poetic Justice
In this article, for a symposium on the intersection of art and law, I explore the artist Felix Gonzalez Torres’ work in relation to a concept that we often focus on in property law, the idea of a “public good,” and how it can relate to the powerful conceptual work that his artistic legacy offers us. Here, I suggest using the concept of a public good as a metaphor for thinking about Felix Gonzalez Torres’ work in three potential ways. First, I use the economic framework of a public good to demonstrate the ways in which his work underscored and also challenged the notion of a singular intellectual property. Second, as I argue in Part II, using a non-market framework, his work also illuminates the concept of a public good in a philosophical sense because his work illuminates the kind of ideal, utopian terrain that law often strives to achieve. Third, I highlight Gonzalez Torres’ work, not in terms of how his work represents a public good, but rather how a decentralized notion of a public good, in both moral and market terms, personifies the legacy of the artist himself. Much of his work reworked the notion of advertising and consumption to use the concept of originality to focus on the way that identities circulated in modern contemporary culture. By reworking classic imagery, Gonzalez Torres also, ironically, forcibly reclaimed the perspectives of those who are often missing from mainstream representations. His work, in many ways, illustrates why it is so important to study the relationships between art and property, between audience and artist, between the visual image and narrative form, between the space between reality and the ideal. His work directs us to study the text or the picture that is created and the meaning that it is supposed to produce—and the space between how that meaning is communicated, and how that meaning is received by the audience. In this article, it is that space—the space between the artist’s intent and the audience’s interpretation—that I want to focus on here, because I believe that the work of Felix Gonzalez Torres carries important lessons for those of us who care, not just about social justice and conceptual art, but who also care about creating a world that enables a multiplicity of interpretations, particularly in the age of new media.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Founded in 1991, the Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy (JLPP) has quickly risen to become one of the leading public policy journals in the nation. A fixture among the top 10 policy journals, JLPP has consistently been among the top 100 student-edited law journals. JLPP publishes articles, student notes, essays, book reviews, and other scholarly works that examine the intersections of compelling public or social policy issues and the law. As a journal of law and policy, we are a publication that not only analyzes the law but also seeks to impact its development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信