哪些因素在CoCo发行中发挥作用?来自欧洲银行的证据

Sara Wagner, Theo Vermaelen, Christian C. P. Wolff
{"title":"哪些因素在CoCo发行中发挥作用?来自欧洲银行的证据","authors":"Sara Wagner, Theo Vermaelen, Christian C. P. Wolff","doi":"10.3905/jod.2022.1.169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the reasons why some banks issue Contingent Convertible (CoCo) bonds, but others do not. To this end, we use a binary logistic model and control for the determinants suggested by the literature. Our findings suggest that larger banks and those with higher Tier 1 capital, higher net loans, higher wholesale funding, lower levels of leverage, and lower risk-weighted assets have a higher tendency to issue CoCos and were the early adopters of this novel financing instrument. Our results also suggest that banks in countries with higher annual growth rate of GDP per capita and those listed as Globally Systematically Important Banks (G-SIBs) were more likely to issue CoCos. These results are difficult to explain by traditional capital structure theory, which assumes that companies voluntarily choose their optimal capital structures, but suggest that banks were more likely to be encouraged or nudged to issue CoCos by following regulators’ advice.","PeriodicalId":34223,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Derivat","volume":"30 1","pages":"58 - 73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which Factors Play a Role in CoCo Issuance? Evidence from European Banks\",\"authors\":\"Sara Wagner, Theo Vermaelen, Christian C. P. Wolff\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jod.2022.1.169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the reasons why some banks issue Contingent Convertible (CoCo) bonds, but others do not. To this end, we use a binary logistic model and control for the determinants suggested by the literature. Our findings suggest that larger banks and those with higher Tier 1 capital, higher net loans, higher wholesale funding, lower levels of leverage, and lower risk-weighted assets have a higher tendency to issue CoCos and were the early adopters of this novel financing instrument. Our results also suggest that banks in countries with higher annual growth rate of GDP per capita and those listed as Globally Systematically Important Banks (G-SIBs) were more likely to issue CoCos. These results are difficult to explain by traditional capital structure theory, which assumes that companies voluntarily choose their optimal capital structures, but suggest that banks were more likely to be encouraged or nudged to issue CoCos by following regulators’ advice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Derivat\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"58 - 73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Derivat\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.2022.1.169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Derivat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.2022.1.169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了一些银行发行或有可转换债券,而另一些银行不发行或有可转换债券的原因。为此,我们使用二元逻辑模型和控制的决定因素提出的文献。我们的研究结果表明,大型银行和那些拥有较高一级资本、较高净贷款、较高批发融资、较低杠杆水平和较低风险加权资产的银行更倾向于发行coco,并且是这种新型融资工具的早期采用者。我们的研究结果还表明,人均GDP年增长率较高的国家的银行和被列为全球系统重要性银行(g - sib)的银行更有可能发行coco。这些结果很难用传统的资本结构理论来解释,传统的资本结构理论假设公司自愿选择最优的资本结构,但这些结果表明,银行更有可能受到监管机构建议的鼓励或推动,发行coco。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Which Factors Play a Role in CoCo Issuance? Evidence from European Banks
This article explores the reasons why some banks issue Contingent Convertible (CoCo) bonds, but others do not. To this end, we use a binary logistic model and control for the determinants suggested by the literature. Our findings suggest that larger banks and those with higher Tier 1 capital, higher net loans, higher wholesale funding, lower levels of leverage, and lower risk-weighted assets have a higher tendency to issue CoCos and were the early adopters of this novel financing instrument. Our results also suggest that banks in countries with higher annual growth rate of GDP per capita and those listed as Globally Systematically Important Banks (G-SIBs) were more likely to issue CoCos. These results are difficult to explain by traditional capital structure theory, which assumes that companies voluntarily choose their optimal capital structures, but suggest that banks were more likely to be encouraged or nudged to issue CoCos by following regulators’ advice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信