虚拟学习环境中的艺术教育:介绍COVID-19时代的课程、政策、预算和实践

Q1 Arts and Humanities

Arts Education Policy Review Pub Date : 2021-06-03 DOI:10.1080/10632913.2021.1931600

Lynn Tuttle, D. Hansen

引用次数: 6

摘要

本文为本期特刊《新冠肺炎及其对pre -12艺术教育的影响》的导论文章，简要介绍本期特刊中收录的文章。每篇文章都提供了简要介绍和上下文设置。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Arts education in a virtual learning environment: an introduction to the lessons, policies, budgets and practices from the COVID-19 era

Abstract This introductory article to this special issue, COVID-19 and its Impact on PreK-12 Arts Education, provides a brief overview of the articles included in the special issue. Each article is provided with a brief introduction and context setting.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Arts Education Policy Review Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Arts Education Policy Review ( AEPR) presents discussion of major policy issues in arts education in the United States and throughout the world. Addressing education in music, visual arts, theatre, and dance, the journal presents a variety of views and emphasizes critical analysis. Its goal is to produce the most comprehensive and rigorous exchange of ideas available on arts education policy. Policy examinations from multiple viewpoints are a valuable resource not only for arts educators, but also for administrators, policy analysts, advocacy groups, parents, and audiences—all those involved in the arts and concerned about their role in education. AEPR focuses on analyses and recommendations focused on policy. The goal of any article should not be description or celebration (although reports of successful programs could be part of an article). Any article focused on a program (or programs) should address why something works or does not work, how it works, how it could work better, and most important, what various policy stakeholders (from teachers to legislators) can do about it. AEPR does not promote individuals, institutions, methods, or products. It does not aim to repeat commonplace ideas. Editors want articles that show originality, probe deeply, and take discussion beyond common wisdom and familiar rhetoric. Articles that merely restate the importance of arts education, call attention to the existence of issues long since addressed, or repeat standard solutions will not be accepted.