{"title":"案例研究:边界与大消声器传播损失有限元计算的关系","authors":"K. Ruan, T. Wu, D. Herrin","doi":"10.3397/1/376927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Silencers used in the power generation industry generally have large ducts entering and leaving the silencer. With large cross-sectional dimensions, the plane wave cutoff frequency will be exceeded at a low frequency so that transmission loss can no longer be evaluated by assuming constant\n sound pressure over a cross-section. More sophisticated calculation and processing approaches are necessary. In this research, the boundary element method is used in conjunction with a reciprocal identity method to determine the transmission loss for rectangular and circular cross-sections:\n the two configurations that cover most real-world designs. The boundary element method is compared to a finite element method strategy where the transmission loss is determined using an automatically matched layer boundary condition at the inlet and outlet. This approach can be used in most\n commercial software. Although these two approaches have little in common, transmission loss results compare well with one other. Validation by comparison is helpful because analytical solutions are only available for simple axisymmetric cases. Methods are compared for practical configurations\n like parallel-baffle silencers and reactive silencers.","PeriodicalId":49748,"journal":{"name":"Noise Control Engineering Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Case study: Correlation between boundary and finite element determination of large silencer transmission loss\",\"authors\":\"K. Ruan, T. Wu, D. Herrin\",\"doi\":\"10.3397/1/376927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Silencers used in the power generation industry generally have large ducts entering and leaving the silencer. With large cross-sectional dimensions, the plane wave cutoff frequency will be exceeded at a low frequency so that transmission loss can no longer be evaluated by assuming constant\\n sound pressure over a cross-section. More sophisticated calculation and processing approaches are necessary. In this research, the boundary element method is used in conjunction with a reciprocal identity method to determine the transmission loss for rectangular and circular cross-sections:\\n the two configurations that cover most real-world designs. The boundary element method is compared to a finite element method strategy where the transmission loss is determined using an automatically matched layer boundary condition at the inlet and outlet. This approach can be used in most\\n commercial software. Although these two approaches have little in common, transmission loss results compare well with one other. Validation by comparison is helpful because analytical solutions are only available for simple axisymmetric cases. Methods are compared for practical configurations\\n like parallel-baffle silencers and reactive silencers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Noise Control Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Noise Control Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3397/1/376927\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noise Control Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3397/1/376927","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Case study: Correlation between boundary and finite element determination of large silencer transmission loss
Silencers used in the power generation industry generally have large ducts entering and leaving the silencer. With large cross-sectional dimensions, the plane wave cutoff frequency will be exceeded at a low frequency so that transmission loss can no longer be evaluated by assuming constant
sound pressure over a cross-section. More sophisticated calculation and processing approaches are necessary. In this research, the boundary element method is used in conjunction with a reciprocal identity method to determine the transmission loss for rectangular and circular cross-sections:
the two configurations that cover most real-world designs. The boundary element method is compared to a finite element method strategy where the transmission loss is determined using an automatically matched layer boundary condition at the inlet and outlet. This approach can be used in most
commercial software. Although these two approaches have little in common, transmission loss results compare well with one other. Validation by comparison is helpful because analytical solutions are only available for simple axisymmetric cases. Methods are compared for practical configurations
like parallel-baffle silencers and reactive silencers.
期刊介绍:
NCEJ is the pre-eminent academic journal of noise control. It is the International Journal of the Institute of Noise Control Engineering of the USA. It is also produced with the participation and assistance of the Korean Society of Noise and Vibration Engineering (KSNVE).
NCEJ reaches noise control professionals around the world, covering over 50 national noise control societies and institutes.
INCE encourages you to submit your next paper to NCEJ. Choosing NCEJ:
Provides the opportunity to reach a global audience of NCE professionals, academics, and students;
Enhances the prestige of your work;
Validates your work by formal peer review.