普通内科病房的供需分析:一项横断面研究

M. Fralick, Neal Kaw, Ming-kai Wang, M. Mamdani, Ophyr Mourad
{"title":"普通内科病房的供需分析:一项横断面研究","authors":"M. Fralick, Neal Kaw, Ming-kai Wang, M. Mamdani, Ophyr Mourad","doi":"10.1101/2021.05.20.21257349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The capacity of the general internal medicine clinical teaching units has been strained by decreasing resident supply and increasing patient demand. The objective of our study was to quantitatively compare the number of residents (supply) with the volume and duration of patient care activities (demand) to identify inefficiency. Methods: Using the most recently available data from an academic teaching hospital, we identified each occurrence of a set of patient care activities that took place on the clinical teaching unit. We completed a descriptive analysis of the frequencies of these activities and how the frequencies varied by hour, day, week, month, and year. Patient care activities included admissions, rounds, responding to pages, meeting with patients and their families, patient transfers, discharges, and responding to cardiac arrests. The estimated time to complete each task was based on the available data in our electronic healthcare system and interviews with general internal medicine physicians or trainees. To calculate resident utilization, the person-hours of patient care tasks was divided by the person-hours of resident supply. Resident utilization was computed for three scenarios corresponding to varying levels of resident absenteeism. Results: Between 2015 and 2019 there were 14,581 consultations to general internal medicine from the emergency department. Patient volumes tended to be highest during January and lowest during May and June; and highest on Monday morning and lowest on Friday night. Daily admissions into hospital from the emergency department were higher on weekdays than on weekends, and hourly admissions peaked at 8:00 AM and between 3:00 PM and 1:00 AM. Weekday resident utilization was generally highest between 8:00 AM and 2:00 PM and lowest between 1:00 AM and 8:00 AM. In a scenario where all residents were present apart from those who were post-call, resident utilization generally never exceeded 100%; in scenarios where at least one resident was absent due to illness and/or vacation, it was common for resident utilization to approach or exceed 100%, particularly during daytime working hours. Interpretation: Analyzing supply and demand on a general internal medicine ward has allowed us to identify periods where supply and demand are not aligned and to empirically demonstrate the vulnerability of current staffing models. These data have the potential to inform and optimize scheduling on an internal medicine ward.","PeriodicalId":93946,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing supply and demand on a general internal medicine ward: a cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"M. Fralick, Neal Kaw, Ming-kai Wang, M. Mamdani, Ophyr Mourad\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2021.05.20.21257349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The capacity of the general internal medicine clinical teaching units has been strained by decreasing resident supply and increasing patient demand. The objective of our study was to quantitatively compare the number of residents (supply) with the volume and duration of patient care activities (demand) to identify inefficiency. Methods: Using the most recently available data from an academic teaching hospital, we identified each occurrence of a set of patient care activities that took place on the clinical teaching unit. We completed a descriptive analysis of the frequencies of these activities and how the frequencies varied by hour, day, week, month, and year. Patient care activities included admissions, rounds, responding to pages, meeting with patients and their families, patient transfers, discharges, and responding to cardiac arrests. The estimated time to complete each task was based on the available data in our electronic healthcare system and interviews with general internal medicine physicians or trainees. To calculate resident utilization, the person-hours of patient care tasks was divided by the person-hours of resident supply. Resident utilization was computed for three scenarios corresponding to varying levels of resident absenteeism. Results: Between 2015 and 2019 there were 14,581 consultations to general internal medicine from the emergency department. Patient volumes tended to be highest during January and lowest during May and June; and highest on Monday morning and lowest on Friday night. Daily admissions into hospital from the emergency department were higher on weekdays than on weekends, and hourly admissions peaked at 8:00 AM and between 3:00 PM and 1:00 AM. Weekday resident utilization was generally highest between 8:00 AM and 2:00 PM and lowest between 1:00 AM and 8:00 AM. In a scenario where all residents were present apart from those who were post-call, resident utilization generally never exceeded 100%; in scenarios where at least one resident was absent due to illness and/or vacation, it was common for resident utilization to approach or exceed 100%, particularly during daytime working hours. Interpretation: Analyzing supply and demand on a general internal medicine ward has allowed us to identify periods where supply and demand are not aligned and to empirically demonstrate the vulnerability of current staffing models. These data have the potential to inform and optimize scheduling on an internal medicine ward.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CMAJ open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CMAJ open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.20.21257349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.20.21257349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:普通内科临床教学单位的能力因住院医师供应减少和患者需求增加而变得紧张。我们研究的目的是定量比较住院人数(供应)与患者护理活动(需求)的数量和持续时间,以确定低效率。方法:使用来自一家学术教学医院的最新可用数据,我们确定了在临床教学单元中发生的一系列患者护理活动的每次发生。我们完成了对这些活动频率的描述性分析,以及频率如何随小时、天、周、月和年而变化。患者护理活动包括入院、查房、回复页面、与患者及其家人会面、患者转移、出院以及对心脏骤停的回应。完成每项任务的估计时间是基于我们电子医疗系统中的可用数据以及对普通内科医生或受训人员的采访。为了计算居民利用率,将患者护理任务的人时除以居民供应的人时。根据不同程度的居民缺勤情况,计算了三种情况下的居民利用率。结果:2015年至2019年间,急诊科共有14581次普通内科会诊。患者人数在1月份往往最高,在5月和6月则最低;周一早上最高,周五晚上最低。急诊科的每日入院人数在工作日高于周末,每小时入院人数在上午8:00和下午3:00至1:00之间达到峰值。工作日住院人数通常在上午8:00至下午2:00之间最高,在凌晨1:00至8:00之间最低,居民利用率一般不会超过100%;在至少有一名居民因病和/或休假缺席的情况下,居民利用率通常接近或超过100%,尤其是在白天工作时间。解读:通过分析普通内科病房的供需情况,我们可以确定供需不一致的时期,并从经验上证明当前人员配置模式的脆弱性。这些数据有可能为内科病房的调度提供信息并进行优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyzing supply and demand on a general internal medicine ward: a cross-sectional study
Background: The capacity of the general internal medicine clinical teaching units has been strained by decreasing resident supply and increasing patient demand. The objective of our study was to quantitatively compare the number of residents (supply) with the volume and duration of patient care activities (demand) to identify inefficiency. Methods: Using the most recently available data from an academic teaching hospital, we identified each occurrence of a set of patient care activities that took place on the clinical teaching unit. We completed a descriptive analysis of the frequencies of these activities and how the frequencies varied by hour, day, week, month, and year. Patient care activities included admissions, rounds, responding to pages, meeting with patients and their families, patient transfers, discharges, and responding to cardiac arrests. The estimated time to complete each task was based on the available data in our electronic healthcare system and interviews with general internal medicine physicians or trainees. To calculate resident utilization, the person-hours of patient care tasks was divided by the person-hours of resident supply. Resident utilization was computed for three scenarios corresponding to varying levels of resident absenteeism. Results: Between 2015 and 2019 there were 14,581 consultations to general internal medicine from the emergency department. Patient volumes tended to be highest during January and lowest during May and June; and highest on Monday morning and lowest on Friday night. Daily admissions into hospital from the emergency department were higher on weekdays than on weekends, and hourly admissions peaked at 8:00 AM and between 3:00 PM and 1:00 AM. Weekday resident utilization was generally highest between 8:00 AM and 2:00 PM and lowest between 1:00 AM and 8:00 AM. In a scenario where all residents were present apart from those who were post-call, resident utilization generally never exceeded 100%; in scenarios where at least one resident was absent due to illness and/or vacation, it was common for resident utilization to approach or exceed 100%, particularly during daytime working hours. Interpretation: Analyzing supply and demand on a general internal medicine ward has allowed us to identify periods where supply and demand are not aligned and to empirically demonstrate the vulnerability of current staffing models. These data have the potential to inform and optimize scheduling on an internal medicine ward.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信