2006年印度奥里萨邦保护区的森林权利法案:环境保护与生计之间的冲突

IF 0.3 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law Pub Date : 2017-08-01 DOI:10.4337/APJEL.2017.01.08

T. Sarangi

{"title":"2006年印度奥里萨邦保护区的森林权利法案:环境保护与生计之间的冲突","authors":"T. Sarangi","doi":"10.4337/APJEL.2017.01.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In protected areas, natural resources support the livelihood needs of local communities, but human activity affects wildlife survival and biodiversity conservation, and leads to serious human–animal conflict, such as crop raiding, livestock predation, and loss of human life. Therefore, the future of wildlife is always in conflict with the livelihood of communities. The Forest Rights Act, 2006 recognises the basic livelihood rights of forest dwellers, but its implementation is besieged with several problems at various institutional levels. With special reference to the implementation of the Forest Rights Act in protected areas of Odisha, this paper discusses the conflict between concepts of conservation and livelihood of people, and suggests some ways to strengthen livelihoods. : Forest, livelihoods, protected areas, rights, tribals : Q 23, Q 24, Q 28 Keywords","PeriodicalId":41125,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law","volume":"20 1","pages":"180-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4337/APJEL.2017.01.08","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Forest Rights Act 2006 in protected areas of Odisha, India: contextualizing the conflict between conservation and livelihood\",\"authors\":\"T. Sarangi\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/APJEL.2017.01.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In protected areas, natural resources support the livelihood needs of local communities, but human activity affects wildlife survival and biodiversity conservation, and leads to serious human–animal conflict, such as crop raiding, livestock predation, and loss of human life. Therefore, the future of wildlife is always in conflict with the livelihood of communities. The Forest Rights Act, 2006 recognises the basic livelihood rights of forest dwellers, but its implementation is besieged with several problems at various institutional levels. With special reference to the implementation of the Forest Rights Act in protected areas of Odisha, this paper discusses the conflict between concepts of conservation and livelihood of people, and suggests some ways to strengthen livelihoods. : Forest, livelihoods, protected areas, rights, tribals : Q 23, Q 24, Q 28 Keywords\",\"PeriodicalId\":41125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"180-205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4337/APJEL.2017.01.08\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/APJEL.2017.01.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/APJEL.2017.01.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

摘要

在保护区，自然资源支持当地社区的生计需求，但人类活动影响野生动物的生存和生物多样性保护，并导致严重的人畜冲突，如作物掠夺、牲畜捕食和人类生命损失。因此，野生动物的未来总是与社区的生计相冲突。2006年的《森林权利法》承认森林居民的基本生计权利，但其实施在各个机构层面都遇到了一些问题。本文特别参考了《森林权利法》在奥里萨邦保护区的实施情况，讨论了保护和民生概念之间的冲突，并提出了一些加强民生的方法森林、生计、保护区、权利、部落：Q 23、Q 24、Q 28关键词

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Forest Rights Act 2006 in protected areas of Odisha, India: contextualizing the conflict between conservation and livelihood

In protected areas, natural resources support the livelihood needs of local communities, but human activity affects wildlife survival and biodiversity conservation, and leads to serious human–animal conflict, such as crop raiding, livestock predation, and loss of human life. Therefore, the future of wildlife is always in conflict with the livelihood of communities. The Forest Rights Act, 2006 recognises the basic livelihood rights of forest dwellers, but its implementation is besieged with several problems at various institutional levels. With special reference to the implementation of the Forest Rights Act in protected areas of Odisha, this paper discusses the conflict between concepts of conservation and livelihood of people, and suggests some ways to strengthen livelihoods. : Forest, livelihoods, protected areas, rights, tribals : Q 23, Q 24, Q 28 Keywords

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law (APJEL) is published in two issues each year by the Australian Centre for Climate and Environmental Law (ACCEL). To subscribe please complete the Subscription form and return to ACCEL.