巴西蚂蚁:基于50年多样性研究的概述

IF 1.8 3区环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION

Systematics and Biodiversity Pub Date : 2022-06-13 DOI:10.1080/14772000.2022.2089268

R. Feitosa, G. P. Camacho, Thiago S. R. Silva, M. Ulysséa, N. Ladino, A. M. Oliveira, E. Albuquerque, F. A. Schmidt, C. Ribas, A. Nogueira, F. Baccaro, A. C. Queiroz, W. Dáttilo, Rogério R. Silva, J. C. Santos, A. Rabello, M. Morini, Y. Quinet, K. Del‐Claro, A. Y. Harada, K. S. Carvalho, T. Sobrinho, A. B. Moraes, A. B. Vargas, H. Torezan‐Silingardi, J. Souza, T. Marques, T. Izzo, D. Lange, Iracenir A. Santos, L. Nahas, L. Paolucci, S. A. Soares, C. B. Costa-Milanez, E. Diehl-Fleig, R. Campos, R. Solar, T. Frizzo, W. DaRocha

{"title":"巴西蚂蚁:基于50年多样性研究的概述","authors":"R. Feitosa, G. P. Camacho, Thiago S. R. Silva, M. Ulysséa, N. Ladino, A. M. Oliveira, E. Albuquerque, F. A. Schmidt, C. Ribas, A. Nogueira, F. Baccaro, A. C. Queiroz, W. Dáttilo, Rogério R. Silva, J. C. Santos, A. Rabello, M. Morini, Y. Quinet, K. Del‐Claro, A. Y. Harada, K. S. Carvalho, T. Sobrinho, A. B. Moraes, A. B. Vargas, H. Torezan‐Silingardi, J. Souza, T. Marques, T. Izzo, D. Lange, Iracenir A. Santos, L. Nahas, L. Paolucci, S. A. Soares, C. B. Costa-Milanez, E. Diehl-Fleig, R. Campos, R. Solar, T. Frizzo, W. DaRocha","doi":"10.1080/14772000.2022.2089268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the historical efforts to list and organize the taxonomic knowledge about the Brazilian ant fauna, the most diverse in the world, several gaps regarding species distribution data and sampling coverage persist. In an attempt to fill some of these gaps, we here apply a scientometric approach to provide an updated overview of the ants of Brazil based on formal publications on ant diversity in the Brazilian territory. In the last 50 years, ant diversity studies in Brazil revealed 1130 species, corresponding to around 70% of the species known to occur in the country. The Brazilian biomes with the highest number of described species recorded were, respectively, the Amazon Forest (716 species), Atlantic Forest (657 species), Cerrado (389 species), Caatinga (185 species), Pantanal (143 species), and Pampa (86 species). Considering the number and frequency of unidentified species, the genera Azteca, Hypoponera, Pheidole, and Solenopsis represent the main knowledge frontiers regarding taxonomic resolution, with more than 80% of their records associated with morphospecies codes in diversity studies in Brazil. Moreover, around 7.5% of the papers presented inconsistences in their species lists regarding the validity of taxonomic names, and we found studies for which some taxa records are geographically implausible. Besides demonstrating the importance of ecological publications to the ant diversity knowledge in Brazil, our findings highlight a strong sampling bias in ant occurrence data in the country, with species records unevenly distributed across Brazilian biomes. In short, our results constitute valuable information for future projects on ant taxonomy and surveying in Brazilian natural areas.","PeriodicalId":54437,"journal":{"name":"Systematics and Biodiversity","volume":"20 1","pages":"1 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ants of Brazil: an overview based on 50 years of diversity studies\",\"authors\":\"R. Feitosa, G. P. Camacho, Thiago S. R. Silva, M. Ulysséa, N. Ladino, A. M. Oliveira, E. Albuquerque, F. A. Schmidt, C. Ribas, A. Nogueira, F. Baccaro, A. C. Queiroz, W. Dáttilo, Rogério R. Silva, J. C. Santos, A. Rabello, M. Morini, Y. Quinet, K. Del‐Claro, A. Y. Harada, K. S. Carvalho, T. Sobrinho, A. B. Moraes, A. B. Vargas, H. Torezan‐Silingardi, J. Souza, T. Marques, T. Izzo, D. Lange, Iracenir A. Santos, L. Nahas, L. Paolucci, S. A. Soares, C. B. Costa-Milanez, E. Diehl-Fleig, R. Campos, R. Solar, T. Frizzo, W. DaRocha\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14772000.2022.2089268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the historical efforts to list and organize the taxonomic knowledge about the Brazilian ant fauna, the most diverse in the world, several gaps regarding species distribution data and sampling coverage persist. In an attempt to fill some of these gaps, we here apply a scientometric approach to provide an updated overview of the ants of Brazil based on formal publications on ant diversity in the Brazilian territory. In the last 50 years, ant diversity studies in Brazil revealed 1130 species, corresponding to around 70% of the species known to occur in the country. The Brazilian biomes with the highest number of described species recorded were, respectively, the Amazon Forest (716 species), Atlantic Forest (657 species), Cerrado (389 species), Caatinga (185 species), Pantanal (143 species), and Pampa (86 species). Considering the number and frequency of unidentified species, the genera Azteca, Hypoponera, Pheidole, and Solenopsis represent the main knowledge frontiers regarding taxonomic resolution, with more than 80% of their records associated with morphospecies codes in diversity studies in Brazil. Moreover, around 7.5% of the papers presented inconsistences in their species lists regarding the validity of taxonomic names, and we found studies for which some taxa records are geographically implausible. Besides demonstrating the importance of ecological publications to the ant diversity knowledge in Brazil, our findings highlight a strong sampling bias in ant occurrence data in the country, with species records unevenly distributed across Brazilian biomes. In short, our results constitute valuable information for future projects on ant taxonomy and surveying in Brazilian natural areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematics and Biodiversity\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematics and Biodiversity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2022.2089268\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematics and Biodiversity","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2022.2089268","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

摘要

巴西蚂蚁是世界上最多样化的蚂蚁群，尽管历史上对巴西蚂蚁群的分类知识进行了列出和整理，但在物种分布数据和采样覆盖率方面仍然存在一些差距。为了填补这些空白，我们在此应用科学计量学方法，根据巴西领土上蚂蚁多样性的正式出版物，提供巴西蚂蚁的最新概况。在过去的50年里，巴西的蚂蚁多样性研究揭示了1130种蚂蚁，相当于该国已知物种的70%左右。记录物种数量最多的巴西生物群落依次为亚马逊森林(716种)、大西洋森林(657种)、塞拉多(389种)、卡廷加(185种)、潘塔纳尔(143种)和潘帕草原(86种)。考虑到未识别种的数量和频率，Azteca属、Hypoponera属、Pheidole属和Solenopsis属代表了分类分辨率的主要知识前沿，在巴西的多样性研究中，其80%以上的记录与形态物种编码有关。此外，大约7.5%的论文在其物种列表中存在关于分类名称有效性的不一致，并且我们发现一些分类群记录在地理上是不可信的。除了证明生态学出版物对巴西蚂蚁多样性知识的重要性外，我们的发现还突出了该国蚂蚁发生数据的强烈抽样偏差，物种记录在巴西生物群落中分布不均匀。总之，我们的结果为未来巴西自然区域蚂蚁分类和调查项目提供了有价值的信息。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Ants of Brazil: an overview based on 50 years of diversity studies

Despite the historical efforts to list and organize the taxonomic knowledge about the Brazilian ant fauna, the most diverse in the world, several gaps regarding species distribution data and sampling coverage persist. In an attempt to fill some of these gaps, we here apply a scientometric approach to provide an updated overview of the ants of Brazil based on formal publications on ant diversity in the Brazilian territory. In the last 50 years, ant diversity studies in Brazil revealed 1130 species, corresponding to around 70% of the species known to occur in the country. The Brazilian biomes with the highest number of described species recorded were, respectively, the Amazon Forest (716 species), Atlantic Forest (657 species), Cerrado (389 species), Caatinga (185 species), Pantanal (143 species), and Pampa (86 species). Considering the number and frequency of unidentified species, the genera Azteca, Hypoponera, Pheidole, and Solenopsis represent the main knowledge frontiers regarding taxonomic resolution, with more than 80% of their records associated with morphospecies codes in diversity studies in Brazil. Moreover, around 7.5% of the papers presented inconsistences in their species lists regarding the validity of taxonomic names, and we found studies for which some taxa records are geographically implausible. Besides demonstrating the importance of ecological publications to the ant diversity knowledge in Brazil, our findings highlight a strong sampling bias in ant occurrence data in the country, with species records unevenly distributed across Brazilian biomes. In short, our results constitute valuable information for future projects on ant taxonomy and surveying in Brazilian natural areas.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Systematics and Biodiversity 环境科学-生物多样性保护

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>24 weeks

期刊介绍： Systematics and Biodiversity is devoted to whole-organism biology. It is a quarterly, international, peer-reviewed, life science journal, without page charges, which is published by Taylor & Francis for The Natural History Museum, London. The criterion for publication is scientific merit. Systematics and Biodiversity documents the diversity of organisms in all natural phyla, through taxonomic papers that have a broad context (not single species descriptions), while also addressing topical issues relating to biological collections, and the principles of systematics. It particularly emphasises the importance and multi-disciplinary significance of systematics, with contributions which address the implications of other fields for systematics, or which advance our understanding of other fields through taxonomic knowledge, especially in relation to the nature, origins, and conservation of biodiversity, at all taxonomic levels. The journal does not publish single species descriptions, monographs or applied research nor alpha species descriptions. Taxonomic manuscripts must include modern methods such as cladistics or phylogenetic analysis.