《住房多样性准则》未能提供住房多样性

IF 1.2 Q2 Social Sciences
Angelo Korsanos
{"title":"《住房多样性准则》未能提供住房多样性","authors":"Angelo Korsanos","doi":"10.1080/07293682.2022.2113548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores the policy failure of the NSW ‘Low Rise Housing Diversity Code’ (implemented through State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 (Codes SEPP)). The Code came into full effect (across all NSW LGAs) on the 1st of July 2020 following a number of deferral periods since its formal adoption in 2018. The Code was intended to address Sydney's ‘missing middle’, notably medium density housing to address affordability and the relative imbalance in available housing typologies between polarised market choices; the detached suburban house on a remote (greenfields) lot, and the apartment in a high density metropolitan centre. The policy ultimately failed to deliver the intended diversity it had seemingly promised. This article explores technical, legislative, political and economic factors contributing to the Code's limited application, as well as actions that further curtailed housing diversity, counter to the Code's intent.","PeriodicalId":45599,"journal":{"name":"Australian Planner","volume":"58 1","pages":"59 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The failure of the ‘Housing Diversity Code’ to deliver housing diversity\",\"authors\":\"Angelo Korsanos\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07293682.2022.2113548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article explores the policy failure of the NSW ‘Low Rise Housing Diversity Code’ (implemented through State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 (Codes SEPP)). The Code came into full effect (across all NSW LGAs) on the 1st of July 2020 following a number of deferral periods since its formal adoption in 2018. The Code was intended to address Sydney's ‘missing middle’, notably medium density housing to address affordability and the relative imbalance in available housing typologies between polarised market choices; the detached suburban house on a remote (greenfields) lot, and the apartment in a high density metropolitan centre. The policy ultimately failed to deliver the intended diversity it had seemingly promised. This article explores technical, legislative, political and economic factors contributing to the Code's limited application, as well as actions that further curtailed housing diversity, counter to the Code's intent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Planner\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"59 - 62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Planner\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2022.2113548\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Planner","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2022.2113548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文探讨了新南威尔士州《低层住宅多样性规范》(通过2008年《国家环境规划政策(豁免和符合发展规范)》(SEPP规范)实施)的政策失败。该准则自2018年正式通过以来,经过了多个延期期,于2020年7月1日(在新南威尔士州所有地方政府机构中)全面生效。该准则旨在解决悉尼的“中间缺失”问题,尤其是中等密度住房,以解决可负担性和两极分化的市场选择之间可用住房类型的相对不平衡问题;位于偏远(绿地)地段的独立式郊区住宅,以及位于高密度大都市中心的公寓。该政策最终未能实现其看似承诺的多样性。本文探讨了导致《守则》适用范围有限的技术、立法、政治和经济因素,以及违背《守则》意图而进一步减少住房多样性的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The failure of the ‘Housing Diversity Code’ to deliver housing diversity
ABSTRACT This article explores the policy failure of the NSW ‘Low Rise Housing Diversity Code’ (implemented through State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 (Codes SEPP)). The Code came into full effect (across all NSW LGAs) on the 1st of July 2020 following a number of deferral periods since its formal adoption in 2018. The Code was intended to address Sydney's ‘missing middle’, notably medium density housing to address affordability and the relative imbalance in available housing typologies between polarised market choices; the detached suburban house on a remote (greenfields) lot, and the apartment in a high density metropolitan centre. The policy ultimately failed to deliver the intended diversity it had seemingly promised. This article explores technical, legislative, political and economic factors contributing to the Code's limited application, as well as actions that further curtailed housing diversity, counter to the Code's intent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Planner
Australian Planner REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信