逆行肾内手术治疗鹿角形肾结石的可行性和疗效

Q3 Medicine
E. Chotikawanich, S. Leewansangtong, Karn Liangkobkit, C. Nualyong, S. Srinualnad, B. Chaiyaprasithi, T. Taweemonkongsap, Kittipong Phinthusophon, S. Jitpraphai, Patkawat Ramart, V. Woranisarakul, C. Suk-ouichai, Thawatchai Mankongsrisuk, T. Hansomwong, Kantima Jongjitaree
{"title":"逆行肾内手术治疗鹿角形肾结石的可行性和疗效","authors":"E. Chotikawanich, S. Leewansangtong, Karn Liangkobkit, C. Nualyong, S. Srinualnad, B. Chaiyaprasithi, T. Taweemonkongsap, Kittipong Phinthusophon, S. Jitpraphai, Patkawat Ramart, V. Woranisarakul, C. Suk-ouichai, Thawatchai Mankongsrisuk, T. Hansomwong, Kantima Jongjitaree","doi":"10.33192/smj.v75i5.261510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To study the safety and efficacy of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in patients with staghorn stones.\nMaterials and Methods: This retrospective observational study was carried out between May 2016 and October 2020, which is when we performed RIRS in staghorn stone patients. Medical records of all patients with this condition in the database of Siriraj Hospital were reviewed. A total of 35 patients were eligible for this study. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the safety and efficacy of RIRS in patients with staghorn stones.\nResults: In total, 31.43% of patients were stone-free after the first round of RIRS and 59.55% achieved stone-free status after the second procedure. The stone-free rate did not increase after a second round of RIRS. The median size of all staghorn stones was 3.1 cm. Unfortunately, we found two sepsis patients in this study. We also found eight events of minor complications, including fever and minimal ureteric injury in 54 sessions of RIRS we performed. However, no major injuries or bleeding requiring blood transfusion was identified.\nConclusion: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is still considered the first-line therapy for kidney stones over two centimeters with a favorable stone-free rate. But, in some patients with limitations such as uncorrectable coagulopathies, impaired renal function, single kidney, and morbid obesity, RIRS is a good choice to reduce the likelihood of serious complications and have an acceptable stone-free rate. However, a prospective study should be performed to confirm these findings.","PeriodicalId":37270,"journal":{"name":"Siriraj Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Feasibility and Outcomes of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery to Treat Staghorn Renal Calculi\",\"authors\":\"E. Chotikawanich, S. Leewansangtong, Karn Liangkobkit, C. Nualyong, S. Srinualnad, B. Chaiyaprasithi, T. Taweemonkongsap, Kittipong Phinthusophon, S. Jitpraphai, Patkawat Ramart, V. Woranisarakul, C. Suk-ouichai, Thawatchai Mankongsrisuk, T. Hansomwong, Kantima Jongjitaree\",\"doi\":\"10.33192/smj.v75i5.261510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To study the safety and efficacy of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in patients with staghorn stones.\\nMaterials and Methods: This retrospective observational study was carried out between May 2016 and October 2020, which is when we performed RIRS in staghorn stone patients. Medical records of all patients with this condition in the database of Siriraj Hospital were reviewed. A total of 35 patients were eligible for this study. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the safety and efficacy of RIRS in patients with staghorn stones.\\nResults: In total, 31.43% of patients were stone-free after the first round of RIRS and 59.55% achieved stone-free status after the second procedure. The stone-free rate did not increase after a second round of RIRS. The median size of all staghorn stones was 3.1 cm. Unfortunately, we found two sepsis patients in this study. We also found eight events of minor complications, including fever and minimal ureteric injury in 54 sessions of RIRS we performed. However, no major injuries or bleeding requiring blood transfusion was identified.\\nConclusion: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is still considered the first-line therapy for kidney stones over two centimeters with a favorable stone-free rate. But, in some patients with limitations such as uncorrectable coagulopathies, impaired renal function, single kidney, and morbid obesity, RIRS is a good choice to reduce the likelihood of serious complications and have an acceptable stone-free rate. However, a prospective study should be performed to confirm these findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Siriraj Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Siriraj Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v75i5.261510\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siriraj Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v75i5.261510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:探讨肾内逆行手术治疗鹿角形结石的安全性和有效性。材料和方法:这项回顾性观察性研究于2016年5月至2020年10月进行,当时我们对鹿角石患者进行了RIRS。对Siriraj医院数据库中所有患有这种疾病的患者的医疗记录进行了审查。共有35名患者符合本研究的条件。描述性统计用于评估RIRS在鹿角形结石患者中的安全性和有效性。结果:总的来说,31.43%的患者在第一轮RIRS后无结石,59.55%的患者在第二轮手术后无结石。第二轮RIRS后,结石游离率没有增加。所有鹿角形结石的平均大小为3.1厘米。不幸的是,我们在这项研究中发现了两名败血症患者。在我们进行的54次RIRS中,我们还发现了8例轻微并发症,包括发烧和轻微输尿管损伤。然而,没有发现需要输血的重大损伤或出血。结论:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)仍然被认为是治疗两厘米以上肾结石的一线治疗方法,有良好的结石清除率。但是,对于一些有局限性的患者,如无法纠正的凝血障碍、肾功能受损、单肾和病态肥胖,RIRS是一个很好的选择,可以降低严重并发症的可能性,并具有可接受的无结石率。然而,应该进行前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Feasibility and Outcomes of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery to Treat Staghorn Renal Calculi
Objective: To study the safety and efficacy of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in patients with staghorn stones. Materials and Methods: This retrospective observational study was carried out between May 2016 and October 2020, which is when we performed RIRS in staghorn stone patients. Medical records of all patients with this condition in the database of Siriraj Hospital were reviewed. A total of 35 patients were eligible for this study. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the safety and efficacy of RIRS in patients with staghorn stones. Results: In total, 31.43% of patients were stone-free after the first round of RIRS and 59.55% achieved stone-free status after the second procedure. The stone-free rate did not increase after a second round of RIRS. The median size of all staghorn stones was 3.1 cm. Unfortunately, we found two sepsis patients in this study. We also found eight events of minor complications, including fever and minimal ureteric injury in 54 sessions of RIRS we performed. However, no major injuries or bleeding requiring blood transfusion was identified. Conclusion: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is still considered the first-line therapy for kidney stones over two centimeters with a favorable stone-free rate. But, in some patients with limitations such as uncorrectable coagulopathies, impaired renal function, single kidney, and morbid obesity, RIRS is a good choice to reduce the likelihood of serious complications and have an acceptable stone-free rate. However, a prospective study should be performed to confirm these findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Siriraj Medical Journal
Siriraj Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信