黄易《小蓬莱阁刻本》(1800)的轮廓、笔法与金石美学

IF 0.2 1区 艺术学 0 ART
Michael J. Hatch
{"title":"黄易《小蓬莱阁刻本》(1800)的轮廓、笔法与金石美学","authors":"Michael J. Hatch","doi":"10.1215/00666637-8124970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:In 1800 Huang Yi published Engraved Texts of the Lesser Penglai Pavilion, reproducing his collection of antique rubbings as well as the later inscriptions added to them by scholars. The original rubbings were made from ancient inscribed stone monuments, and the book’s immediate audience was the aficionados of such objects, scholars of epigraphy and evidential research. A technique that exactly conveyed the material condition of those aged rubbings was important to these scholars. Huang Yi chose the outline method called shuanggou, which traced the broken boundaries between figure and ground. This old method for copying calligraphy usually involved two stages—outlining and filling in—so that the final product reproduced a simulacrum of the original calligraphy. Huang Yi left his reproductions at the outline stage, however, which resulted in strange, warped, and broken figures that merged figure and ground, calling attention to the illegibility of many of the characters reproduced in the rubbings and evacuating the calligraphy of brushwork. This essay analyzes the figures of Engraved Texts within the context of a broader epigraphic aesthetic that permeated calligraphy and painting circa 1800. It goes on to suggest that Huang Yi’s choice of shuanggou outlines, while firmly rooted in an epigraphic obsession with the material past, also marked the horizon of a changing attitude toward brushwork, and had more in common with modern methods of visualizing the world, such as the drafting techniques later implemented in engineering schools during the modernizing reforms of the late nineteenth century.","PeriodicalId":41400,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIVES OF ASIAN ART","volume":"70 1","pages":"23 - 49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outline, Brushwork, and the Epigraphic Aesthetic in Huang Yi’s Engraved Texts of the Lesser Penglai Pavilion (1800)\",\"authors\":\"Michael J. Hatch\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/00666637-8124970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:In 1800 Huang Yi published Engraved Texts of the Lesser Penglai Pavilion, reproducing his collection of antique rubbings as well as the later inscriptions added to them by scholars. The original rubbings were made from ancient inscribed stone monuments, and the book’s immediate audience was the aficionados of such objects, scholars of epigraphy and evidential research. A technique that exactly conveyed the material condition of those aged rubbings was important to these scholars. Huang Yi chose the outline method called shuanggou, which traced the broken boundaries between figure and ground. This old method for copying calligraphy usually involved two stages—outlining and filling in—so that the final product reproduced a simulacrum of the original calligraphy. Huang Yi left his reproductions at the outline stage, however, which resulted in strange, warped, and broken figures that merged figure and ground, calling attention to the illegibility of many of the characters reproduced in the rubbings and evacuating the calligraphy of brushwork. This essay analyzes the figures of Engraved Texts within the context of a broader epigraphic aesthetic that permeated calligraphy and painting circa 1800. It goes on to suggest that Huang Yi’s choice of shuanggou outlines, while firmly rooted in an epigraphic obsession with the material past, also marked the horizon of a changing attitude toward brushwork, and had more in common with modern methods of visualizing the world, such as the drafting techniques later implemented in engineering schools during the modernizing reforms of the late nineteenth century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARCHIVES OF ASIAN ART\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"23 - 49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARCHIVES OF ASIAN ART\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/00666637-8124970\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIVES OF ASIAN ART","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00666637-8124970","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1800年,黄易出版了《小蓬莱阁刻本》,复制了他收藏的古旧拓本,以及后来学者在拓本上添加的铭文。最初的拓片是由古代刻有铭文的石碑制成的,这本书的直接受众是这些物品的爱好者、金石学和证据研究学者。对这些学者来说,一种准确地传达这些古老拓片物质状况的技术是很重要的。黄易选择了一种叫做“双勾”的勾勒方法,这种方法追踪了人物和地面之间破碎的界限。这种古老的临摹书法的方法通常包括两个阶段——勾勒和填充——这样最终的作品就复制了原始书法的仿像。然而,黄易的复制品是在轮廓阶段留下的,这导致了奇怪、扭曲、破碎的图形融合了图形和地面,引起了人们对拓本中许多复制文字难以辨认的注意,并使笔法书法黯然失色。本文从1800年前后渗透到书画中的更广泛的金石美学的角度来分析《刻文》中的人物形象。这进一步表明,黄易对双勾轮廓的选择,虽然牢固地植根于对物质过去的金石痴迷,但也标志着对笔触态度的转变,并与现代视觉世界的方法有更多的共同点,例如后来在19世纪末的现代化改革中在工程学校实施的绘图技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outline, Brushwork, and the Epigraphic Aesthetic in Huang Yi’s Engraved Texts of the Lesser Penglai Pavilion (1800)
abstract:In 1800 Huang Yi published Engraved Texts of the Lesser Penglai Pavilion, reproducing his collection of antique rubbings as well as the later inscriptions added to them by scholars. The original rubbings were made from ancient inscribed stone monuments, and the book’s immediate audience was the aficionados of such objects, scholars of epigraphy and evidential research. A technique that exactly conveyed the material condition of those aged rubbings was important to these scholars. Huang Yi chose the outline method called shuanggou, which traced the broken boundaries between figure and ground. This old method for copying calligraphy usually involved two stages—outlining and filling in—so that the final product reproduced a simulacrum of the original calligraphy. Huang Yi left his reproductions at the outline stage, however, which resulted in strange, warped, and broken figures that merged figure and ground, calling attention to the illegibility of many of the characters reproduced in the rubbings and evacuating the calligraphy of brushwork. This essay analyzes the figures of Engraved Texts within the context of a broader epigraphic aesthetic that permeated calligraphy and painting circa 1800. It goes on to suggest that Huang Yi’s choice of shuanggou outlines, while firmly rooted in an epigraphic obsession with the material past, also marked the horizon of a changing attitude toward brushwork, and had more in common with modern methods of visualizing the world, such as the drafting techniques later implemented in engineering schools during the modernizing reforms of the late nineteenth century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Since its establishment in 1945, Archives of Asian Art has been devoted to publishing new scholarship on the art and architecture of South, Southeast, Central, and East Asia. Articles discuss premodern and contemporary visual arts, archaeology, architecture, and the history of collecting. To maintain a balanced representation of regions and types of art and to present a variety of scholarly perspectives, the editors encourage submissions in all areas of study related to Asian art and architecture. Every issue is fully illustrated (with color plates in the online version), and each fall issue includes an illustrated compendium of recent acquisitions of Asian art by leading museums and collections. Archives of Asian Art is a publication of Asia Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信