Yun-hui Xia, M. Cai, Bo Wang, L. Mao, Xu-dong Wang, G. Shen, Guo-min Wang
{"title":"唇腭裂患者牙面畸形关节正颌与正畸治疗的稳定性","authors":"Yun-hui Xia, M. Cai, Bo Wang, L. Mao, Xu-dong Wang, G. Shen, Guo-min Wang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-0290.2019.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the skeletal stability of joint orthognathic and orthodontic treatment for cleft patients compared with non-cleft patients. \n \n \nMethods \nFifteen cleft patient diagnosed with dental facial deformities underwent joint orthognathic and orthodontic treatment. Cephalometric analysis was carried out at T0 (before treatment), T1 (2 weeks after surgery), T2 (6 months after surgery) and T3 (24 months after surgery). The comparison of maxillary anterior-posterior and superior-inferior movement was performed with non-cleft orthognathic group (n=15) at the same follow-up time point. \n \n \nResults \nThe maxilla was move forward for (3.8±1.5) mm and downward for (2.4±0.8) mm of cleft group. The relapse distance was (1.2±0.7) mm (T1-T2: 31.6%) in AP direction and (0.9±0.6) mm (T1-T2: 37.5%) in vertical direction. At the time of 24 months after operation, the relapse distance was (1.0±0.5) mm (T1-T3: 26.0%) in AP direction and (0.8±0.8) mm (T1-T3: 33.3%) vertically. In non-cleft group, the maxilla was move (4.3±1.2) mm anteriorly and (2.2±1.9) mm vertically. The relapse distance was (0.9±1.2) mm (T1-T2: 20.9%) anteriorly and (0.8±0.9) mm (T1-T2: 36.6%) vertically at 6 months post-operatively. At 24 months after surgery the relapse distance was (1.1±0.6) mm (T1-T3: 25.6%) anteriorly and (0.9±0.5) mm (T1-T3: 40.9%) vertically. There were no statistical significant in both 6 months and 24 months follow-up between cleft and non-cleft group (P>0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nThere is no statistic difference of post-surgical relapse rate between cleft and non-cleft orthognathic and orthodontic treatments, although the relapse distances are greater than that in cleft group. \n \n \nKey words: \nCleft lip; Cleft palate; Orthognathic surgical procedures; Orthodontic anchorage procedures; Recurrence","PeriodicalId":10094,"journal":{"name":"中华医学美学美容杂志","volume":"25 1","pages":"261-265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stability of joint orthognathic and orthodontic treatment for dental-facial deformity in patients with cleft lip and palate\",\"authors\":\"Yun-hui Xia, M. Cai, Bo Wang, L. Mao, Xu-dong Wang, G. Shen, Guo-min Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-0290.2019.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo evaluate the skeletal stability of joint orthognathic and orthodontic treatment for cleft patients compared with non-cleft patients. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nFifteen cleft patient diagnosed with dental facial deformities underwent joint orthognathic and orthodontic treatment. Cephalometric analysis was carried out at T0 (before treatment), T1 (2 weeks after surgery), T2 (6 months after surgery) and T3 (24 months after surgery). The comparison of maxillary anterior-posterior and superior-inferior movement was performed with non-cleft orthognathic group (n=15) at the same follow-up time point. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe maxilla was move forward for (3.8±1.5) mm and downward for (2.4±0.8) mm of cleft group. The relapse distance was (1.2±0.7) mm (T1-T2: 31.6%) in AP direction and (0.9±0.6) mm (T1-T2: 37.5%) in vertical direction. At the time of 24 months after operation, the relapse distance was (1.0±0.5) mm (T1-T3: 26.0%) in AP direction and (0.8±0.8) mm (T1-T3: 33.3%) vertically. In non-cleft group, the maxilla was move (4.3±1.2) mm anteriorly and (2.2±1.9) mm vertically. The relapse distance was (0.9±1.2) mm (T1-T2: 20.9%) anteriorly and (0.8±0.9) mm (T1-T2: 36.6%) vertically at 6 months post-operatively. At 24 months after surgery the relapse distance was (1.1±0.6) mm (T1-T3: 25.6%) anteriorly and (0.9±0.5) mm (T1-T3: 40.9%) vertically. There were no statistical significant in both 6 months and 24 months follow-up between cleft and non-cleft group (P>0.05). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nThere is no statistic difference of post-surgical relapse rate between cleft and non-cleft orthognathic and orthodontic treatments, although the relapse distances are greater than that in cleft group. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nCleft lip; Cleft palate; Orthognathic surgical procedures; Orthodontic anchorage procedures; Recurrence\",\"PeriodicalId\":10094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华医学美学美容杂志\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"261-265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华医学美学美容杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-0290.2019.04.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医学美学美容杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-0290.2019.04.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Stability of joint orthognathic and orthodontic treatment for dental-facial deformity in patients with cleft lip and palate
Objective
To evaluate the skeletal stability of joint orthognathic and orthodontic treatment for cleft patients compared with non-cleft patients.
Methods
Fifteen cleft patient diagnosed with dental facial deformities underwent joint orthognathic and orthodontic treatment. Cephalometric analysis was carried out at T0 (before treatment), T1 (2 weeks after surgery), T2 (6 months after surgery) and T3 (24 months after surgery). The comparison of maxillary anterior-posterior and superior-inferior movement was performed with non-cleft orthognathic group (n=15) at the same follow-up time point.
Results
The maxilla was move forward for (3.8±1.5) mm and downward for (2.4±0.8) mm of cleft group. The relapse distance was (1.2±0.7) mm (T1-T2: 31.6%) in AP direction and (0.9±0.6) mm (T1-T2: 37.5%) in vertical direction. At the time of 24 months after operation, the relapse distance was (1.0±0.5) mm (T1-T3: 26.0%) in AP direction and (0.8±0.8) mm (T1-T3: 33.3%) vertically. In non-cleft group, the maxilla was move (4.3±1.2) mm anteriorly and (2.2±1.9) mm vertically. The relapse distance was (0.9±1.2) mm (T1-T2: 20.9%) anteriorly and (0.8±0.9) mm (T1-T2: 36.6%) vertically at 6 months post-operatively. At 24 months after surgery the relapse distance was (1.1±0.6) mm (T1-T3: 25.6%) anteriorly and (0.9±0.5) mm (T1-T3: 40.9%) vertically. There were no statistical significant in both 6 months and 24 months follow-up between cleft and non-cleft group (P>0.05).
Conclusions
There is no statistic difference of post-surgical relapse rate between cleft and non-cleft orthognathic and orthodontic treatments, although the relapse distances are greater than that in cleft group.
Key words:
Cleft lip; Cleft palate; Orthognathic surgical procedures; Orthodontic anchorage procedures; Recurrence
期刊介绍:
"Chinese Journal of Medical Aesthetics and Cosmetology" is a high-end academic journal focusing on the basic theoretical research and clinical application of medical aesthetics and cosmetology. In March 2002, it was included in the statistical source journals of Chinese scientific and technological papers of the Ministry of Science and Technology, and has been included in the full-text retrieval system of "China Journal Network", "Chinese Academic Journals (CD-ROM Edition)" and "China Academic Journals Comprehensive Evaluation Database". Publishes research and applications in cosmetic surgery, cosmetic dermatology, cosmetic dentistry, cosmetic internal medicine, physical cosmetology, drug cosmetology, traditional Chinese medicine cosmetology and beauty care. Columns include: clinical treatises, experimental research, medical aesthetics, experience summaries, case reports, technological innovations, reviews, lectures, etc.