拓展英语学习者的交际技能,促进对话行为

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
J. S. Gómez-Giraldo
{"title":"拓展英语学习者的交际技能,促进对话行为","authors":"J. S. Gómez-Giraldo","doi":"10.19183/how.29.1.647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This action research study sought to foster dialogic action through the expansion of English language learners’ communicative repertoires in a 6th-grade class at a public school in a Colombian town. During the first action research cycle, the restricted concept of communication of the grammar-based syllabus and the competitive and violent interactions between the learners were identified as key issues to address. From a critical perspective of pedagogy and literacy, this study understands that communication in language education should transcend the use of a standard target language, and include multiple linguistic codes and multimodal representative forms. Considering these principles and the issues identified, we designed an action plan for the second action research cycle. This plan consisted of activities that sought to expand English language learners’ communicative repertoires and promote reflections on violence and conflict resolution through the analysis and creation of different visual representations. Data were collected through journal entries, semi-structured interviews, and students’ artifacts. Findings show how the learners have a diverse and differentiated access to communicative repertoires and how they manipulated available representations to transform meanings. As a conclusion, not enough evidence of the emergence of dialogic action was found since competitiveness and violent interactions in the classroom did not significantly change during the intervention. Nonetheless, embracing the learners’ communicative practices created spaces for reflection on complex social and moral topics in the classroom, even if their English linguistic resources were still limited.","PeriodicalId":43460,"journal":{"name":"How-A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting Dialogic Action through the Expansion of English Language Learners’ Communicative Repertoires\",\"authors\":\"J. S. Gómez-Giraldo\",\"doi\":\"10.19183/how.29.1.647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This action research study sought to foster dialogic action through the expansion of English language learners’ communicative repertoires in a 6th-grade class at a public school in a Colombian town. During the first action research cycle, the restricted concept of communication of the grammar-based syllabus and the competitive and violent interactions between the learners were identified as key issues to address. From a critical perspective of pedagogy and literacy, this study understands that communication in language education should transcend the use of a standard target language, and include multiple linguistic codes and multimodal representative forms. Considering these principles and the issues identified, we designed an action plan for the second action research cycle. This plan consisted of activities that sought to expand English language learners’ communicative repertoires and promote reflections on violence and conflict resolution through the analysis and creation of different visual representations. Data were collected through journal entries, semi-structured interviews, and students’ artifacts. Findings show how the learners have a diverse and differentiated access to communicative repertoires and how they manipulated available representations to transform meanings. As a conclusion, not enough evidence of the emergence of dialogic action was found since competitiveness and violent interactions in the classroom did not significantly change during the intervention. Nonetheless, embracing the learners’ communicative practices created spaces for reflection on complex social and moral topics in the classroom, even if their English linguistic resources were still limited.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"How-A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"How-A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19183/how.29.1.647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"How-A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19183/how.29.1.647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这项行动研究旨在通过扩大哥伦比亚一所公立学校六年级学生的交际曲目来促进对话行动。在第一个行动研究周期中,基于语法的教学大纲的有限沟通概念以及学习者之间的竞争和暴力互动被确定为需要解决的关键问题。从教育学和读写能力的批判性角度来看,本研究理解语言教育中的交流应该超越标准目标语言的使用,并包括多种语言代码和多模式的代表形式。考虑到这些原则和确定的问题,我们为第二个行动研究周期设计了一个行动计划。该计划旨在通过分析和创造不同的视觉表现,扩大英语学习者的交际能力,促进对暴力和冲突解决的思考。数据是通过日记条目、半结构化访谈和学生的人工制品收集的。研究结果表明,学习者如何获得多样化和差异化的交际曲目,以及他们如何操纵可用的表征来转换含义。因此,没有发现足够的证据表明对话行动的出现,因为在干预期间,课堂上的竞争和暴力互动没有显著变化。尽管如此,即使他们的英语语言资源仍然有限,接受学习者的交际实践也为在课堂上反思复杂的社会和道德话题创造了空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Promoting Dialogic Action through the Expansion of English Language Learners’ Communicative Repertoires
This action research study sought to foster dialogic action through the expansion of English language learners’ communicative repertoires in a 6th-grade class at a public school in a Colombian town. During the first action research cycle, the restricted concept of communication of the grammar-based syllabus and the competitive and violent interactions between the learners were identified as key issues to address. From a critical perspective of pedagogy and literacy, this study understands that communication in language education should transcend the use of a standard target language, and include multiple linguistic codes and multimodal representative forms. Considering these principles and the issues identified, we designed an action plan for the second action research cycle. This plan consisted of activities that sought to expand English language learners’ communicative repertoires and promote reflections on violence and conflict resolution through the analysis and creation of different visual representations. Data were collected through journal entries, semi-structured interviews, and students’ artifacts. Findings show how the learners have a diverse and differentiated access to communicative repertoires and how they manipulated available representations to transform meanings. As a conclusion, not enough evidence of the emergence of dialogic action was found since competitiveness and violent interactions in the classroom did not significantly change during the intervention. Nonetheless, embracing the learners’ communicative practices created spaces for reflection on complex social and moral topics in the classroom, even if their English linguistic resources were still limited.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
How-A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English
How-A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信