早期临床接触——MBBS学生的有效性和态度

Q4 Medicine
Dini Mathew, B. Lakshmi Kantha, P. Dhanasekar
{"title":"早期临床接触——MBBS学生的有效性和态度","authors":"Dini Mathew, B. Lakshmi Kantha, P. Dhanasekar","doi":"10.4103/NJCA.NJCA_241_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In the traditional method, students learn theory without contacting patients in the initial part of MBBS. Early clinical exposure creates a scope for students to correlate basic science and clinical application. Hence, there is a need to study the effectiveness of different forms of early clinical exposure (ECE). The objectives of the study were to compare the knowledge acquired and attitude toward ECE by the students after different forms of ECE. Methodology: An observational study was done with 1st-year MBBS (n = 150) students. Based on the National Medical Council (Then Medical Council of India) II ECE document for undergraduate medical education programs, 10 topics were selected. The first six ECE sessions were conducted in the classroom, the next two at the hospital, and the last two virtually. Phase-validated structured multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and feedback were given to students before and after every ECE. The MCQ scores and feedback conducted in three forms were statistically analyzed. Results: There was a notable disparity in the mean between pre- and posttest. The mean scores of the virtual mode were better than the other two forms. As per the feedback analysis, most of the students observed ECE aid to clear conceptualization, critical thinking, and correlate anatomical basis in clinical cases. However, students also felt that it is too early to understand the topic in such detail in 1st year. Conclusion: This longitudinal study on ECE showed there is an increase in the knowledge and analytical skills of students. Hence, we recommend continuing ECE and to have a blended learning environment along with limited content to be included for a better outcome.","PeriodicalId":52750,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Clinical Anatomy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early clinical exposure – Effectiveness and attitude among MBBS students\",\"authors\":\"Dini Mathew, B. Lakshmi Kantha, P. Dhanasekar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/NJCA.NJCA_241_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: In the traditional method, students learn theory without contacting patients in the initial part of MBBS. Early clinical exposure creates a scope for students to correlate basic science and clinical application. Hence, there is a need to study the effectiveness of different forms of early clinical exposure (ECE). The objectives of the study were to compare the knowledge acquired and attitude toward ECE by the students after different forms of ECE. Methodology: An observational study was done with 1st-year MBBS (n = 150) students. Based on the National Medical Council (Then Medical Council of India) II ECE document for undergraduate medical education programs, 10 topics were selected. The first six ECE sessions were conducted in the classroom, the next two at the hospital, and the last two virtually. Phase-validated structured multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and feedback were given to students before and after every ECE. The MCQ scores and feedback conducted in three forms were statistically analyzed. Results: There was a notable disparity in the mean between pre- and posttest. The mean scores of the virtual mode were better than the other two forms. As per the feedback analysis, most of the students observed ECE aid to clear conceptualization, critical thinking, and correlate anatomical basis in clinical cases. However, students also felt that it is too early to understand the topic in such detail in 1st year. Conclusion: This longitudinal study on ECE showed there is an increase in the knowledge and analytical skills of students. Hence, we recommend continuing ECE and to have a blended learning environment along with limited content to be included for a better outcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"National Journal of Clinical Anatomy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"National Journal of Clinical Anatomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/NJCA.NJCA_241_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Clinical Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/NJCA.NJCA_241_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在传统的方法中,学生在MBBS的初始阶段学习理论而不接触患者。早期临床接触为学生提供了将基础科学与临床应用联系起来的机会。因此,有必要研究不同形式的早期临床暴露(ECE)的有效性。本研究的目的是比较不同形式的幼儿教育后,学生对幼儿教育的知识和态度。方法:对一年级MBBS学生(n = 150)进行观察性研究。根据国家医学委员会(当时的印度医学委员会)II ECE本科医学教育项目文件,选择了10个主题。欧洲经委会前六次会议是在教室里进行的,接下来的两次是在医院进行的,最后两次是在网上进行的。在每次ECE之前和之后,向学生提供阶段性验证的结构化选择题(mcq)和反馈。对三种形式的MCQ得分和反馈进行统计分析。结果:测前与测后均数有显著差异。虚拟模式的平均得分优于其他两种模式。根据反馈分析,大多数学生观察到ECE有助于明确概念,批判性思维,并在临床病例中关联解剖基础。然而,学生们也觉得在大一的时候对这个话题有如此详细的了解还为时过早。结论:本纵向研究显示,学生的知识和分析能力有所提高。因此,我们建议继续进行欧洲经委会,并在有限的内容中加入混合学习环境,以获得更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early clinical exposure – Effectiveness and attitude among MBBS students
Background: In the traditional method, students learn theory without contacting patients in the initial part of MBBS. Early clinical exposure creates a scope for students to correlate basic science and clinical application. Hence, there is a need to study the effectiveness of different forms of early clinical exposure (ECE). The objectives of the study were to compare the knowledge acquired and attitude toward ECE by the students after different forms of ECE. Methodology: An observational study was done with 1st-year MBBS (n = 150) students. Based on the National Medical Council (Then Medical Council of India) II ECE document for undergraduate medical education programs, 10 topics were selected. The first six ECE sessions were conducted in the classroom, the next two at the hospital, and the last two virtually. Phase-validated structured multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and feedback were given to students before and after every ECE. The MCQ scores and feedback conducted in three forms were statistically analyzed. Results: There was a notable disparity in the mean between pre- and posttest. The mean scores of the virtual mode were better than the other two forms. As per the feedback analysis, most of the students observed ECE aid to clear conceptualization, critical thinking, and correlate anatomical basis in clinical cases. However, students also felt that it is too early to understand the topic in such detail in 1st year. Conclusion: This longitudinal study on ECE showed there is an increase in the knowledge and analytical skills of students. Hence, we recommend continuing ECE and to have a blended learning environment along with limited content to be included for a better outcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信