城市公园的框架:使用社会媒体数据评估布莱恩特公园,纽约

IF 1.3 0 ARCHITECTURE
Jessica Fernandez, Yang Song, M. Padua, Pai-Chien Liu
{"title":"城市公园的框架:使用社会媒体数据评估布莱恩特公园,纽约","authors":"Jessica Fernandez, Yang Song, M. Padua, Pai-Chien Liu","doi":"10.3368/lj.41.1.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parks play a critical role in the health and well-being of people in urban environments. Recent events such as the COVID-19 pandemic have underscored the importance of public parks, particularly in cities. To maximize the benefits of these spaces, it is important to understand the social dimension of site user experiences within successful urban parks. Social media data provide a means to assess public places through the lens of large quantities of site users over time. Recent landscape research studies provide assessments of urban and nature-based locations using social media data and are predominantly quantitative in their methodologies (Havinga et al., 2021; Donahue et al., 2018; Wood et al., 2013). However, incorporating mixed methods into existing approaches can create a better understanding of site user experiences. This study uses 11,419 Tripadvisor reviews from the years 2010 to 2018 in a multi-step process, where qualitative content analysis builds upon Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) modeling topics to assess the semantic content of Bryant Park, NY. The new framework emerging from this process separates site user perceptions and sentiment positivity into categories. Site design elements are revealed as a major positive focus of site users, along with the position of the park within the urban fabric, site activity consisting of passive pastimes, and the essence of the space related to emotions. The study’s findings can provide guidance for designers and park managers for the creation of successful urban parks and provide another baseline for research on New York City’s parks.","PeriodicalId":54062,"journal":{"name":"Landscape Journal","volume":"41 1","pages":"15 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Framework for Urban Parks: Using Social Media Data to Assess Bryant Park, New York\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Fernandez, Yang Song, M. Padua, Pai-Chien Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3368/lj.41.1.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Parks play a critical role in the health and well-being of people in urban environments. Recent events such as the COVID-19 pandemic have underscored the importance of public parks, particularly in cities. To maximize the benefits of these spaces, it is important to understand the social dimension of site user experiences within successful urban parks. Social media data provide a means to assess public places through the lens of large quantities of site users over time. Recent landscape research studies provide assessments of urban and nature-based locations using social media data and are predominantly quantitative in their methodologies (Havinga et al., 2021; Donahue et al., 2018; Wood et al., 2013). However, incorporating mixed methods into existing approaches can create a better understanding of site user experiences. This study uses 11,419 Tripadvisor reviews from the years 2010 to 2018 in a multi-step process, where qualitative content analysis builds upon Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) modeling topics to assess the semantic content of Bryant Park, NY. The new framework emerging from this process separates site user perceptions and sentiment positivity into categories. Site design elements are revealed as a major positive focus of site users, along with the position of the park within the urban fabric, site activity consisting of passive pastimes, and the essence of the space related to emotions. The study’s findings can provide guidance for designers and park managers for the creation of successful urban parks and provide another baseline for research on New York City’s parks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landscape Journal\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"15 - 29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landscape Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.41.1.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.41.1.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

公园对城市环境中人们的健康和福祉起着至关重要的作用。最近发生的事件,如COVID-19大流行,突显了公园的重要性,特别是在城市。为了最大限度地发挥这些空间的优势,了解成功的城市公园中网站用户体验的社会维度是很重要的。社交媒体数据提供了一种通过大量网站用户的视角来评估公共场所的方法。最近的景观研究使用社交媒体数据对城市和基于自然的地点进行评估,其方法主要是定量的(Havinga等人,2021;Donahue et al., 2018;Wood et al., 2013)。然而,将混合方法合并到现有方法中可以更好地理解站点用户体验。本研究使用2010年至2018年的11,419条Tripadvisor评论,采用多步骤流程,在潜在狄利克雷分配(Latent Dirichlet allocation, LDA)建模主题的基础上进行定性内容分析,以评估纽约州Bryant Park的语义内容。从这个过程中产生的新框架将网站用户的感知和情绪积极性分类。场地设计元素被揭示为场地用户的主要积极焦点,以及公园在城市结构中的位置,由被动消遣组成的场地活动,以及与情感相关的空间本质。研究结果可以为设计师和公园管理者创造成功的城市公园提供指导,并为纽约市公园的研究提供另一个基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Framework for Urban Parks: Using Social Media Data to Assess Bryant Park, New York
Parks play a critical role in the health and well-being of people in urban environments. Recent events such as the COVID-19 pandemic have underscored the importance of public parks, particularly in cities. To maximize the benefits of these spaces, it is important to understand the social dimension of site user experiences within successful urban parks. Social media data provide a means to assess public places through the lens of large quantities of site users over time. Recent landscape research studies provide assessments of urban and nature-based locations using social media data and are predominantly quantitative in their methodologies (Havinga et al., 2021; Donahue et al., 2018; Wood et al., 2013). However, incorporating mixed methods into existing approaches can create a better understanding of site user experiences. This study uses 11,419 Tripadvisor reviews from the years 2010 to 2018 in a multi-step process, where qualitative content analysis builds upon Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) modeling topics to assess the semantic content of Bryant Park, NY. The new framework emerging from this process separates site user perceptions and sentiment positivity into categories. Site design elements are revealed as a major positive focus of site users, along with the position of the park within the urban fabric, site activity consisting of passive pastimes, and the essence of the space related to emotions. The study’s findings can provide guidance for designers and park managers for the creation of successful urban parks and provide another baseline for research on New York City’s parks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape Journal
Landscape Journal ARCHITECTURE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The mission of landscape architecture is supported by research and theory in many fields. Landscape Journal offers in-depth exploration of ideas and challenges that are central to contemporary design, planning, and teaching. Besides scholarly features, Landscape Journal also includes editorial columns, creative work, reviews of books, conferences, technology, and exhibitions. Landscape Journal digs deeper into the field by providing articles from: • landscape architects • geographers • architects • planners • artists • historians • ecologists • poets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信