亚太经济体的战略贸易和投资框架与地缘政治联系

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
R. Ajami
{"title":"亚太经济体的战略贸易和投资框架与地缘政治联系","authors":"R. Ajami","doi":"10.1080/10599231.2022.2095584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The announced trade deal, the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF), is a loosely-structured economic bloc advocated by the current US administration, which will include 13 countries. These countries, in addition to the United States, will be Australia, Brunei, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Thailand, and Vietnam. The bloc represents an estimated 40% of the global economy. In addition to its membership, IPEF could create global standards for AsiaPacific economies and beyond. This, according to US pronouncements, could bring faster economic growth across Asia-Pacific economies. Currently, the US GDP growth rate for 2022 is expected to be 2.8%, while that of China will be 2%. The position of the United States is that of strength and represents a shift away from the unfounded notion that China would be there to overtake the United States. The United States will continue to be the leading economy, and China will continue to be the second-largest economy. Nevertheless, there are certain advantages to the IPEF. The framework will help lower the cost of supply chains and reduce costly disruptions and could ensure a higher level of economic competitiveness during the next century for the whole region. Cooperation and economic and political stability and prosperity will also be enhanced. The framework was intended to be a replacement to the prior Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which was advocated by former President Obama and current President Biden, and which former President Trump dropped out of in 2017. The pillars of the framework will focus on harmonizing corporate supply chains, expanding digital trade and clean energy, and fighting corruption. Critics of the IPEF’s loosely coupled framework suggest that this enlarged alliance is intended to reduce the regional influence of China, and some of the member states indicate that it should go beyond challenging China’s influence and should produce a functional economic bloc that will enhance and improve the positions of all the participant economies. Seven countries from the earlier TPP will belong in the IPEF; however, countries such as Canada and Mexico did not join as they are already in a free trade area with the United States. Moreover, US labor and environmental groups, which lobbied against the earlier TPP, are equally concerned about the IPEF, when it comes to digital JOURNAL OF ASIA-PACIFIC BUSINESS 2022, VOL. 23, NO. 3, 183–186 https://doi.org/10.1080/10599231.2022.2095584","PeriodicalId":15043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asia-Pacific Business","volume":"23 1","pages":"183 - 186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic Trade and Investments Framework and Geopolitical Linkages across Asia-Pacific Economies\",\"authors\":\"R. Ajami\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10599231.2022.2095584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The announced trade deal, the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF), is a loosely-structured economic bloc advocated by the current US administration, which will include 13 countries. These countries, in addition to the United States, will be Australia, Brunei, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Thailand, and Vietnam. The bloc represents an estimated 40% of the global economy. In addition to its membership, IPEF could create global standards for AsiaPacific economies and beyond. This, according to US pronouncements, could bring faster economic growth across Asia-Pacific economies. Currently, the US GDP growth rate for 2022 is expected to be 2.8%, while that of China will be 2%. The position of the United States is that of strength and represents a shift away from the unfounded notion that China would be there to overtake the United States. The United States will continue to be the leading economy, and China will continue to be the second-largest economy. Nevertheless, there are certain advantages to the IPEF. The framework will help lower the cost of supply chains and reduce costly disruptions and could ensure a higher level of economic competitiveness during the next century for the whole region. Cooperation and economic and political stability and prosperity will also be enhanced. The framework was intended to be a replacement to the prior Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which was advocated by former President Obama and current President Biden, and which former President Trump dropped out of in 2017. The pillars of the framework will focus on harmonizing corporate supply chains, expanding digital trade and clean energy, and fighting corruption. Critics of the IPEF’s loosely coupled framework suggest that this enlarged alliance is intended to reduce the regional influence of China, and some of the member states indicate that it should go beyond challenging China’s influence and should produce a functional economic bloc that will enhance and improve the positions of all the participant economies. Seven countries from the earlier TPP will belong in the IPEF; however, countries such as Canada and Mexico did not join as they are already in a free trade area with the United States. Moreover, US labor and environmental groups, which lobbied against the earlier TPP, are equally concerned about the IPEF, when it comes to digital JOURNAL OF ASIA-PACIFIC BUSINESS 2022, VOL. 23, NO. 3, 183–186 https://doi.org/10.1080/10599231.2022.2095584\",\"PeriodicalId\":15043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asia-Pacific Business\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"183 - 186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asia-Pacific Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10599231.2022.2095584\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asia-Pacific Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10599231.2022.2095584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

已宣布的贸易协议,即印太经济框架(IPEF),是美国现任政府倡导的一个结构松散的经济集团,将包括13个国家。除美国外,这些国家将是澳大利亚、文莱、印度、印度尼西亚、日本、马来西亚、新西兰、菲律宾、新加坡、韩国、泰国和越南。据估计,该集团占全球经济的40%。除了成员之外,IPEF还可以为亚太及其他地区的经济体制定全球标准。根据美国的声明,这可能会给整个亚太经济体带来更快的经济增长。目前,美国2022年的GDP增长率预计为2.8%,而中国的增长率为2%。美国的立场是实力,这代表着中国将超越美国这一毫无根据的观念的转变。美国将继续是领先的经济体,中国将继续是第二大经济体。尽管如此,IPEF还是有一些优势的。该框架将有助于降低供应链成本,减少代价高昂的中断,并可确保整个地区在下个世纪具有更高水平的经济竞争力。合作以及经济和政治稳定与繁荣也将得到加强。该框架旨在取代之前的跨太平洋伙伴关系协定(TPP),该协定由前总统奥巴马和现任总统拜登倡导,前总统特朗普于2017年退出。该框架的支柱将侧重于协调企业供应链、扩大数字贸易和清洁能源以及打击腐败。IPEF松散耦合框架的批评者认为,这种扩大的联盟旨在降低中国的地区影响力,一些成员国表示,它应该超越挑战中国的影响力,应该产生一个功能性经济集团,以提高和改善所有参与经济体的地位。早期TPP的七个国家将加入IPEF;然而,加拿大和墨西哥等国没有加入,因为它们已经处于与美国的自由贸易区。此外,游说反对早期TPP的美国劳工和环境组织在《2022年亚太商业数字杂志》第23卷第3期183–186中也同样关注IPEFhttps://doi.org/10.1080/10599231.2022.2095584
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategic Trade and Investments Framework and Geopolitical Linkages across Asia-Pacific Economies
The announced trade deal, the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF), is a loosely-structured economic bloc advocated by the current US administration, which will include 13 countries. These countries, in addition to the United States, will be Australia, Brunei, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Thailand, and Vietnam. The bloc represents an estimated 40% of the global economy. In addition to its membership, IPEF could create global standards for AsiaPacific economies and beyond. This, according to US pronouncements, could bring faster economic growth across Asia-Pacific economies. Currently, the US GDP growth rate for 2022 is expected to be 2.8%, while that of China will be 2%. The position of the United States is that of strength and represents a shift away from the unfounded notion that China would be there to overtake the United States. The United States will continue to be the leading economy, and China will continue to be the second-largest economy. Nevertheless, there are certain advantages to the IPEF. The framework will help lower the cost of supply chains and reduce costly disruptions and could ensure a higher level of economic competitiveness during the next century for the whole region. Cooperation and economic and political stability and prosperity will also be enhanced. The framework was intended to be a replacement to the prior Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which was advocated by former President Obama and current President Biden, and which former President Trump dropped out of in 2017. The pillars of the framework will focus on harmonizing corporate supply chains, expanding digital trade and clean energy, and fighting corruption. Critics of the IPEF’s loosely coupled framework suggest that this enlarged alliance is intended to reduce the regional influence of China, and some of the member states indicate that it should go beyond challenging China’s influence and should produce a functional economic bloc that will enhance and improve the positions of all the participant economies. Seven countries from the earlier TPP will belong in the IPEF; however, countries such as Canada and Mexico did not join as they are already in a free trade area with the United States. Moreover, US labor and environmental groups, which lobbied against the earlier TPP, are equally concerned about the IPEF, when it comes to digital JOURNAL OF ASIA-PACIFIC BUSINESS 2022, VOL. 23, NO. 3, 183–186 https://doi.org/10.1080/10599231.2022.2095584
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Asia-Pacific Business
Journal of Asia-Pacific Business Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Present circumstances underscore the need to improve the understanding of conducting business with and within the Asia-Pacific countries. The Journal of Asia-Pacific Business™ provides a blend of cutting-edge knowledge and practical applications on business management and marketing strategy. In the Journal of Asia-Pacific Business™, you will find articles and feature sections that provide a pragmatic view of the business environment in this dynamic region. This essential resource offers readers a good blend of descriptive, conceptual, and theoretical articles dealing with current topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信