权力与理念:欧元区危机期间爱尔兰社会伙伴关系模式终结的合法化

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Angie Gago
{"title":"权力与理念:欧元区危机期间爱尔兰社会伙伴关系模式终结的合法化","authors":"Angie Gago","doi":"10.1080/07907184.2021.1880392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT One of the consequences of the Eurozone crisis was the collapse of social concertation. Some authors have explained that the need for fiscal retrenchment deprived governments of resources to offer concessions to trade unions (Regan, 2013). Although these explanations partly explain why social partnership ended, we do not yet know how political actors achieved this institutional change, neither which ideas they used to legitimate it. This article adopts a discursive institutionalist framework (Schmidt, 2008, 2010) to identify the ideas and the causal mechanisms through which political leaders were able to exercise ideational power in a paradigmatic case study: Ireland. The article argues that external constraints during the crisis empowered specific political actors that used the crisis as a ‘moment of political opportunity’ (Béland, 2005, p. 10) to end the social partnership model. They constructed a communicative discourse to legitimise this change based on the ideas that social partnership was dysfunctional and undemocratic.","PeriodicalId":45746,"journal":{"name":"Irish Political Studies","volume":"37 1","pages":"43 - 63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07907184.2021.1880392","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power and ideas: the legitimisation of the end of the Irish social partnership model during the Eurozone crisis\",\"authors\":\"Angie Gago\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07907184.2021.1880392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT One of the consequences of the Eurozone crisis was the collapse of social concertation. Some authors have explained that the need for fiscal retrenchment deprived governments of resources to offer concessions to trade unions (Regan, 2013). Although these explanations partly explain why social partnership ended, we do not yet know how political actors achieved this institutional change, neither which ideas they used to legitimate it. This article adopts a discursive institutionalist framework (Schmidt, 2008, 2010) to identify the ideas and the causal mechanisms through which political leaders were able to exercise ideational power in a paradigmatic case study: Ireland. The article argues that external constraints during the crisis empowered specific political actors that used the crisis as a ‘moment of political opportunity’ (Béland, 2005, p. 10) to end the social partnership model. They constructed a communicative discourse to legitimise this change based on the ideas that social partnership was dysfunctional and undemocratic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Political Studies\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"43 - 63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07907184.2021.1880392\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Political Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2021.1880392\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Political Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2021.1880392","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要欧元区危机的后果之一是社会凝聚力的崩溃。一些作者解释说,财政紧缩的必要性剥夺了政府向工会提供优惠的资源(Regan,2013)。尽管这些解释在一定程度上解释了社会伙伴关系结束的原因,但我们还不知道政治行动者是如何实现这一制度变革的,也不知道他们使用了哪些思想来使其合法化。本文采用了一个话语制度主义框架(Schmidt,20082010)来确定政治领导人能够在一个典型的案例研究中行使概念权力的思想和因果机制:爱尔兰。文章认为,危机期间的外部制约因素赋予了特定的政治行为者权力,他们将危机作为“政治机会时刻”(Béland,2005,第10页)来结束社会伙伴关系模式。他们基于社会伙伴关系失调和不民主的观点,构建了一种沟通话语,以使这种变化合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Power and ideas: the legitimisation of the end of the Irish social partnership model during the Eurozone crisis
ABSTRACT One of the consequences of the Eurozone crisis was the collapse of social concertation. Some authors have explained that the need for fiscal retrenchment deprived governments of resources to offer concessions to trade unions (Regan, 2013). Although these explanations partly explain why social partnership ended, we do not yet know how political actors achieved this institutional change, neither which ideas they used to legitimate it. This article adopts a discursive institutionalist framework (Schmidt, 2008, 2010) to identify the ideas and the causal mechanisms through which political leaders were able to exercise ideational power in a paradigmatic case study: Ireland. The article argues that external constraints during the crisis empowered specific political actors that used the crisis as a ‘moment of political opportunity’ (Béland, 2005, p. 10) to end the social partnership model. They constructed a communicative discourse to legitimise this change based on the ideas that social partnership was dysfunctional and undemocratic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Political Studies
Irish Political Studies POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
28.60%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信