什么因素影响马铃薯种植户采用其他有害生物管理方法?来自肯尼亚六个县的证据

Idah Mugambi, L. Karanja, I. Macharia, W. Kaguongo, G. Ngundo, R. Amata, F. Makale, Jane Wanjiku, D. Chacha, M. Nyongesa, J. Kimenju, W. Ochilo, J. Mulema
{"title":"什么因素影响马铃薯种植户采用其他有害生物管理方法?来自肯尼亚六个县的证据","authors":"Idah Mugambi, L. Karanja, I. Macharia, W. Kaguongo, G. Ngundo, R. Amata, F. Makale, Jane Wanjiku, D. Chacha, M. Nyongesa, J. Kimenju, W. Ochilo, J. Mulema","doi":"10.5897/JDAE2021.1278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Potato pest and disease management has been dominated by chemical pesticides, despite their potential undesirable effects on the environment, food safety and human health. This study explores factors influencing intensity of uptake of alternative pest management practices among potato farmers in Kenya, through a survey of 1,002 farmers in six main potato growing counties in the country. A Poisson count model was used to determine the intensity of uptake of alternative pest management practices. On average, farmers employed five practices: weeding, fertilizer application, recommended spacing, scouting, and crop rotation. Age of respondent (older farmers) and utilization of face-to-face and participatory extension approaches were significantly and positively associated with intensity of uptake of alternative pest control practices. Passive sources of extension advice such as radio and television were inversely related to uptake intensity of alternative pest control practices. These findings underscore the efficacy of agricultural information sources that are practical in approach, as they have the greatest potential to influence farmers’ adoption decisions. Mass communication methods create awareness and provide information at low-cost, but are not sufficient in triggering behaviour change when used on their own. There is therefore need to integrate them with conventional extension approaches to achieve the duo benefit of scale and adoption. \n \n Keywords: Potato, Alternative pest management practices, Poisson count model, Kenya.","PeriodicalId":90891,"journal":{"name":"Journal of development and agricultural economics","volume":"13 1","pages":"205-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What influences uptake of alternative pest management practices by potato farmers? Evidence from six counties in Kenya\",\"authors\":\"Idah Mugambi, L. Karanja, I. Macharia, W. Kaguongo, G. Ngundo, R. Amata, F. Makale, Jane Wanjiku, D. Chacha, M. Nyongesa, J. Kimenju, W. Ochilo, J. Mulema\",\"doi\":\"10.5897/JDAE2021.1278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Potato pest and disease management has been dominated by chemical pesticides, despite their potential undesirable effects on the environment, food safety and human health. This study explores factors influencing intensity of uptake of alternative pest management practices among potato farmers in Kenya, through a survey of 1,002 farmers in six main potato growing counties in the country. A Poisson count model was used to determine the intensity of uptake of alternative pest management practices. On average, farmers employed five practices: weeding, fertilizer application, recommended spacing, scouting, and crop rotation. Age of respondent (older farmers) and utilization of face-to-face and participatory extension approaches were significantly and positively associated with intensity of uptake of alternative pest control practices. Passive sources of extension advice such as radio and television were inversely related to uptake intensity of alternative pest control practices. These findings underscore the efficacy of agricultural information sources that are practical in approach, as they have the greatest potential to influence farmers’ adoption decisions. Mass communication methods create awareness and provide information at low-cost, but are not sufficient in triggering behaviour change when used on their own. There is therefore need to integrate them with conventional extension approaches to achieve the duo benefit of scale and adoption. \\n \\n Keywords: Potato, Alternative pest management practices, Poisson count model, Kenya.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of development and agricultural economics\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"205-214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of development and agricultural economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5897/JDAE2021.1278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of development and agricultural economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/JDAE2021.1278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管化学农药对环境、食品安全和人类健康有潜在的不良影响,但马铃薯病虫害管理一直以化学农药为主。本研究通过对肯尼亚六个主要马铃薯种植县的1002名农民的调查,探讨了影响肯尼亚马铃薯农民接受替代害虫管理措施强度的因素。泊松计数模型用于确定替代害虫管理实践的吸收强度。平均而言,农民采用了五种做法:除草、施肥、推荐间隔、侦察和轮作。受访者(年长农民)的年龄以及面对面和参与式推广方法的使用与采用替代虫害防治方法的强度显著正相关。被动的推广建议来源,如广播和电视,与替代虫害控制做法的吸收强度呈反比。这些发现强调了实用的农业信息来源的有效性,因为它们最有可能影响农民的收养决定。大众传播方法以低成本创造意识和提供信息,但单独使用不足以引发行为改变。因此,有必要将它们与传统的推广方法相结合,以实现规模和采用的双重效益。关键词:马铃薯,病虫害替代管理方法,泊松计数模型,肯尼亚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What influences uptake of alternative pest management practices by potato farmers? Evidence from six counties in Kenya
Potato pest and disease management has been dominated by chemical pesticides, despite their potential undesirable effects on the environment, food safety and human health. This study explores factors influencing intensity of uptake of alternative pest management practices among potato farmers in Kenya, through a survey of 1,002 farmers in six main potato growing counties in the country. A Poisson count model was used to determine the intensity of uptake of alternative pest management practices. On average, farmers employed five practices: weeding, fertilizer application, recommended spacing, scouting, and crop rotation. Age of respondent (older farmers) and utilization of face-to-face and participatory extension approaches were significantly and positively associated with intensity of uptake of alternative pest control practices. Passive sources of extension advice such as radio and television were inversely related to uptake intensity of alternative pest control practices. These findings underscore the efficacy of agricultural information sources that are practical in approach, as they have the greatest potential to influence farmers’ adoption decisions. Mass communication methods create awareness and provide information at low-cost, but are not sufficient in triggering behaviour change when used on their own. There is therefore need to integrate them with conventional extension approaches to achieve the duo benefit of scale and adoption. Keywords: Potato, Alternative pest management practices, Poisson count model, Kenya.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信