微藻培养基的生命周期评估:盐藻和tertiolecta产生的生物量、甘油和β-胡萝卜素

IF 4.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Gleison de Souza Celente, Rosana de Cassia de Souza Schneider, Jennifer Julich, Tiele Medianeira Rizzetti, Eduardo Alcayaga Lobo, Yixing Sui
{"title":"微藻培养基的生命周期评估:盐藻和tertiolecta产生的生物量、甘油和β-胡萝卜素","authors":"Gleison de Souza Celente, Rosana de Cassia de Souza Schneider, Jennifer Julich, Tiele Medianeira Rizzetti, Eduardo Alcayaga Lobo, Yixing Sui","doi":"10.1007/s11367-023-02209-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong><i>Dunaliella</i> is a halophilic genus of microalgae with high potential in the global food market. The microalgal cultivation process contributes to not only economic impact but also environmental impact, especially regarding the artificial medium composition. In this context, a life cycle assessment was carried out to analyze the impacts associated with the components of the modified Johnson medium (MJM) and to predict the best scenarios to cultivate <i>Dunaliella tertiolecta</i> and <i>Dunaliella salina</i> for biomass, glycerol, and beta-carotene production.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two chains were analyzed separately: (1) <i>Dunaliella salina</i> (strain DF 15) cultivated in 8 scenarios combining different nitrogen (0.1 and 1.0 g L<sup>-1</sup> KNO<sub>3</sub>) and magnesium (1.1-2.3 g L<sup>-1</sup> MgCl<sub>2</sub>.6H<sub>2</sub>O) concentrations to produce biomass, glycerol, and beta-carotene and (2) <i>Dunaliella tertiolecta</i> (strain CCAP 19/30) cultivated in 5 scenarios combining different nitrogen (0.1 and 1.0 g L<sup>-1</sup> KNO<sub>3</sub>) and salt (116.9-175.4 g L<sup>-1</sup> sea salt) concentrations to produce biomass and glycerol. In addition, we evaluated the potential of cultivating these species to reduce the carbon footprint of the proposed scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>For <i>D. salina</i>, S<sub>5</sub> (1 g L<sup>-1</sup> KNO<sub>3</sub>, 1.1 g L<sup>-1</sup> MgCl<sub>2</sub>.6H<sub>2</sub>O) had the lowest environmental damage for biomass (74.2 mPt) and glycerol production (0.95 Pt) and S<sub>3</sub> (0.1 g L<sup>-1</sup> KNO<sub>3</sub>, 1.9 g L<sup>-1</sup> MgCl<sub>2</sub>.6H<sub>2</sub>O) for beta-carotene (3.88 Pt). T<sub>4</sub> (1 g L<sup>-1</sup> KNO<sub>3</sub>, 116.9 g L<sup>-1</sup> sea salt) was the best for <i>D. tertiolecta</i> for biomass (74 mPt) and glycerol (0.49 Pt). \"Respiratory inorganics,\" \"Non-renewable energy,\" and \"Global warming\" were the most impacted categories. \"Human health,\" \"Climate change,\" and \"Resources\" had the highest share of all damage categories. All the scenarios presented negative carbon emission after proposing using brine as alternative salt source: S<sub>5</sub> was the best scenario (- 157.5 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq) for <i>D. salina</i> and T<sub>4</sub> for <i>D. tertiolecta</i> (- 213.6 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LCA proved its importance in accurately predicting the optimal scenarios for MJM composition in the analyzed bioproducts, as confirmed by the Monte Carlo simulation. Although the absolute values of impacts and productivity cannot be directly compared to large-scale cultivation, the validity of the LCA results at this scale remains intact. Productivity gains could outweigh the impacts of \"surplus\" MJM components. Our study showcased the potential of combining <i>D. salina</i> and <i>D. tertiolecta</i> cultivation with CO<sub>2</sub> capture, leading to a more environmentally friendly cultivation system with a reduced carbon footprint.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11367-023-02209-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":54952,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"2269-2282"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11627462/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life cycle assessment of microalgal cultivation medium: biomass, glycerol, and beta-carotene production by <i>Dunaliella salina</i> and <i>Dunaliella tertiolecta</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Gleison de Souza Celente, Rosana de Cassia de Souza Schneider, Jennifer Julich, Tiele Medianeira Rizzetti, Eduardo Alcayaga Lobo, Yixing Sui\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11367-023-02209-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong><i>Dunaliella</i> is a halophilic genus of microalgae with high potential in the global food market. The microalgal cultivation process contributes to not only economic impact but also environmental impact, especially regarding the artificial medium composition. In this context, a life cycle assessment was carried out to analyze the impacts associated with the components of the modified Johnson medium (MJM) and to predict the best scenarios to cultivate <i>Dunaliella tertiolecta</i> and <i>Dunaliella salina</i> for biomass, glycerol, and beta-carotene production.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two chains were analyzed separately: (1) <i>Dunaliella salina</i> (strain DF 15) cultivated in 8 scenarios combining different nitrogen (0.1 and 1.0 g L<sup>-1</sup> KNO<sub>3</sub>) and magnesium (1.1-2.3 g L<sup>-1</sup> MgCl<sub>2</sub>.6H<sub>2</sub>O) concentrations to produce biomass, glycerol, and beta-carotene and (2) <i>Dunaliella tertiolecta</i> (strain CCAP 19/30) cultivated in 5 scenarios combining different nitrogen (0.1 and 1.0 g L<sup>-1</sup> KNO<sub>3</sub>) and salt (116.9-175.4 g L<sup>-1</sup> sea salt) concentrations to produce biomass and glycerol. In addition, we evaluated the potential of cultivating these species to reduce the carbon footprint of the proposed scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>For <i>D. salina</i>, S<sub>5</sub> (1 g L<sup>-1</sup> KNO<sub>3</sub>, 1.1 g L<sup>-1</sup> MgCl<sub>2</sub>.6H<sub>2</sub>O) had the lowest environmental damage for biomass (74.2 mPt) and glycerol production (0.95 Pt) and S<sub>3</sub> (0.1 g L<sup>-1</sup> KNO<sub>3</sub>, 1.9 g L<sup>-1</sup> MgCl<sub>2</sub>.6H<sub>2</sub>O) for beta-carotene (3.88 Pt). T<sub>4</sub> (1 g L<sup>-1</sup> KNO<sub>3</sub>, 116.9 g L<sup>-1</sup> sea salt) was the best for <i>D. tertiolecta</i> for biomass (74 mPt) and glycerol (0.49 Pt). \\\"Respiratory inorganics,\\\" \\\"Non-renewable energy,\\\" and \\\"Global warming\\\" were the most impacted categories. \\\"Human health,\\\" \\\"Climate change,\\\" and \\\"Resources\\\" had the highest share of all damage categories. All the scenarios presented negative carbon emission after proposing using brine as alternative salt source: S<sub>5</sub> was the best scenario (- 157.5 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq) for <i>D. salina</i> and T<sub>4</sub> for <i>D. tertiolecta</i> (- 213.6 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LCA proved its importance in accurately predicting the optimal scenarios for MJM composition in the analyzed bioproducts, as confirmed by the Monte Carlo simulation. Although the absolute values of impacts and productivity cannot be directly compared to large-scale cultivation, the validity of the LCA results at this scale remains intact. Productivity gains could outweigh the impacts of \\\"surplus\\\" MJM components. Our study showcased the potential of combining <i>D. salina</i> and <i>D. tertiolecta</i> cultivation with CO<sub>2</sub> capture, leading to a more environmentally friendly cultivation system with a reduced carbon footprint.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11367-023-02209-2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2269-2282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11627462/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-023-02209-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-023-02209-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:杜氏藻是全球食品市场上极具潜力的嗜盐微藻属。微藻的培养过程不仅对经济产生影响,而且对环境产生影响,特别是在人工培养基组成方面。在此背景下,进行了生命周期评估,分析了改良约翰逊培养基(MJM)成分对杜氏藻生物量、甘油和β -胡萝卜素产量的影响,并预测了培养杜氏藻和盐杜氏藻的最佳条件。方法:分别对2条链进行分析:(1)在不同氮(0.1和1.0 g L-1 KNO3)和镁(1.1 ~ 2.3 g L-1 MgCl2.6H2O)浓度下培养的杜氏盐藻(菌株DF 15)产生生物量、甘油和β -胡萝卜素;(2)在不同氮(0.1和1.0 g L-1 KNO3)和盐(116.9 ~ 175.4 g L-1海盐)浓度下培养的杜氏盐藻(菌株CCAP 19/30)产生生物量和甘油。此外,我们还评估了在不同情景下种植这些物种以减少碳足迹的潜力。结果和讨论:对于盐藻,S5 (1 g L-1 KNO3, 1.1 g L-1 MgCl2.6H2O)对生物质(74.2 mPt)和甘油(0.95 Pt)的环境破坏最小,S3 (0.1 g L-1 KNO3, 1.9 g L-1 MgCl2.6H2O)对β -胡萝卜素(3.88 Pt)的环境破坏最小。T4 (1 g L-1 KNO3, 116.9 g L-1海盐)对三叶蓟马生物量(74 mPt)和甘油(0.49 Pt)最好。“呼吸性无机物”、“不可再生能源”和“全球变暖”是受影响最大的类别。“人类健康”、“气候变化”和“资源”在所有损害类别中所占比例最高。采用卤水作为替代盐源后,所有情景均呈现负碳排放,其中S5情景为盐藻D. salina最佳情景(- 157.5 kg CO2-eq), T4情景为D. tertiolecta最佳情景(- 213.6 kg CO2-eq)。结论:通过蒙特卡罗模拟证实了LCA在准确预测所分析生物制品中MJM组成的最佳方案方面的重要性。虽然影响和生产力的绝对值不能直接与大规模种植进行比较,但在这种规模下,LCA结果的有效性仍然是完整的。生产率的提高可能会超过“过剩”MJM组件的影响。我们的研究展示了将盐藻和三角藻的种植与二氧化碳捕获相结合的潜力,从而形成一个更环保的种植系统,减少碳足迹。补充资料:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址:10.1007/s11367-023-02209-2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Life cycle assessment of microalgal cultivation medium: biomass, glycerol, and beta-carotene production by Dunaliella salina and Dunaliella tertiolecta.

Purpose: Dunaliella is a halophilic genus of microalgae with high potential in the global food market. The microalgal cultivation process contributes to not only economic impact but also environmental impact, especially regarding the artificial medium composition. In this context, a life cycle assessment was carried out to analyze the impacts associated with the components of the modified Johnson medium (MJM) and to predict the best scenarios to cultivate Dunaliella tertiolecta and Dunaliella salina for biomass, glycerol, and beta-carotene production.

Method: Two chains were analyzed separately: (1) Dunaliella salina (strain DF 15) cultivated in 8 scenarios combining different nitrogen (0.1 and 1.0 g L-1 KNO3) and magnesium (1.1-2.3 g L-1 MgCl2.6H2O) concentrations to produce biomass, glycerol, and beta-carotene and (2) Dunaliella tertiolecta (strain CCAP 19/30) cultivated in 5 scenarios combining different nitrogen (0.1 and 1.0 g L-1 KNO3) and salt (116.9-175.4 g L-1 sea salt) concentrations to produce biomass and glycerol. In addition, we evaluated the potential of cultivating these species to reduce the carbon footprint of the proposed scenarios.

Results and discussion: For D. salina, S5 (1 g L-1 KNO3, 1.1 g L-1 MgCl2.6H2O) had the lowest environmental damage for biomass (74.2 mPt) and glycerol production (0.95 Pt) and S3 (0.1 g L-1 KNO3, 1.9 g L-1 MgCl2.6H2O) for beta-carotene (3.88 Pt). T4 (1 g L-1 KNO3, 116.9 g L-1 sea salt) was the best for D. tertiolecta for biomass (74 mPt) and glycerol (0.49 Pt). "Respiratory inorganics," "Non-renewable energy," and "Global warming" were the most impacted categories. "Human health," "Climate change," and "Resources" had the highest share of all damage categories. All the scenarios presented negative carbon emission after proposing using brine as alternative salt source: S5 was the best scenario (- 157.5 kg CO2-eq) for D. salina and T4 for D. tertiolecta (- 213.6 kg CO2-eq).

Conclusion: The LCA proved its importance in accurately predicting the optimal scenarios for MJM composition in the analyzed bioproducts, as confirmed by the Monte Carlo simulation. Although the absolute values of impacts and productivity cannot be directly compared to large-scale cultivation, the validity of the LCA results at this scale remains intact. Productivity gains could outweigh the impacts of "surplus" MJM components. Our study showcased the potential of combining D. salina and D. tertiolecta cultivation with CO2 capture, leading to a more environmentally friendly cultivation system with a reduced carbon footprint.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11367-023-02209-2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
100
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (Int J Life Cycle Assess) is the first journal devoted entirely to Life Cycle Assessment and closely related methods. LCA has become a recognized instrument to assess the ecological burdens and impacts throughout the consecutive and interlinked stages of a product system, from raw material acquisition or generation from natural resources, through production and use to final disposal. The Int J Life Cycle Assess is a forum for scientists developing LCA and LCM (Life Cycle Management); LCA and LCM practitioners; managers concerned with environmental aspects of products; governmental environmental agencies responsible for product quality; scientific and industrial societies involved in LCA development, and ecological institutions and bodies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信