承认吸引力:殖民地别墅、视觉和使女(2016)作为评论家

IF 0.2 Q2 HISTORY
Keungyoon Bae
{"title":"承认吸引力:殖民地别墅、视觉和使女(2016)作为评论家","authors":"Keungyoon Bae","doi":"10.22372/ijkh.2020.25.2.175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2016’s The Handmaiden is unusual among contemporary Korean films for more than one reason. Firstly, we have an explicitly queer, in fact erotically queer narrative from a country where LGBT rights are still very much a point of contention, especially in recent years (although there are grounds for optimism). Secondly, it is a South Korean film that has received a substantial amount of attention from European and American media; while Korean films have certainly been making the rounds at film festivals and art house cinema circles for years, it is still relatively uncommon to see a Korean film break into the American mainstream in terms of marketing and distribution, and receive coverage in publications as varied as The New Yorker, Indiewire, and Gawker (now Gizmodo)","PeriodicalId":40840,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Korean History","volume":"25 1","pages":"175-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Admitting an Attraction: Colonial Villainy, Visuality, and The Handmaiden (2016) as Critique\",\"authors\":\"Keungyoon Bae\",\"doi\":\"10.22372/ijkh.2020.25.2.175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"2016’s The Handmaiden is unusual among contemporary Korean films for more than one reason. Firstly, we have an explicitly queer, in fact erotically queer narrative from a country where LGBT rights are still very much a point of contention, especially in recent years (although there are grounds for optimism). Secondly, it is a South Korean film that has received a substantial amount of attention from European and American media; while Korean films have certainly been making the rounds at film festivals and art house cinema circles for years, it is still relatively uncommon to see a Korean film break into the American mainstream in terms of marketing and distribution, and receive coverage in publications as varied as The New Yorker, Indiewire, and Gawker (now Gizmodo)\",\"PeriodicalId\":40840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Korean History\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"175-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Korean History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22372/ijkh.2020.25.2.175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Korean History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22372/ijkh.2020.25.2.175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2016年的《使女》在当代韩国电影中不同寻常,原因不止一个。首先,我们有一个明显的酷儿,事实上是色情酷儿的叙事,来自一个LGBT权利仍然是争论点的国家,尤其是近年来(尽管有理由乐观)。其次,这是一部受到欧美媒体大量关注的韩国电影;虽然韩国电影多年来一直在电影节和艺术院线圈子里广为流传,但韩国电影在营销和发行方面闯入美国主流,并在《纽约客》、《独立报》和《Gawker》(现为Gizmodo)等各种出版物上获得报道的情况仍然相对罕见
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Admitting an Attraction: Colonial Villainy, Visuality, and The Handmaiden (2016) as Critique
2016’s The Handmaiden is unusual among contemporary Korean films for more than one reason. Firstly, we have an explicitly queer, in fact erotically queer narrative from a country where LGBT rights are still very much a point of contention, especially in recent years (although there are grounds for optimism). Secondly, it is a South Korean film that has received a substantial amount of attention from European and American media; while Korean films have certainly been making the rounds at film festivals and art house cinema circles for years, it is still relatively uncommon to see a Korean film break into the American mainstream in terms of marketing and distribution, and receive coverage in publications as varied as The New Yorker, Indiewire, and Gawker (now Gizmodo)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信