托里型人工晶状体与配对对侧角膜切口矫正白内障超声乳化术后低度散光的比较研究

IF 0.1 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
W. Ebeid, Noureldin Abozeid
{"title":"托里型人工晶状体与配对对侧角膜切口矫正白内障超声乳化术后低度散光的比较研究","authors":"W. Ebeid, Noureldin Abozeid","doi":"10.4103/ejos.ejos_102_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose To compare toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation versus monofocal (Eyhance) IOL with paired corneal incisions for correction of low-grade astigmatism after phacoemulsification. Patients and methods A retrospective comparative study included 30 patients with low-grade astigmatism (−0.75 to −1.50 D) who underwent phacoemulsification: group 1 underwent toric IOL implantation (TECNIS toric) and group 2 underwent enhanced monofocal IOL (TECNIS Eyhance) with paired corneal incision along steep corneal meridian. Best-corrected visual acuity, astigmatism power, and axis were assessed preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Vector analysis of astigmatism was done using the Alpins method. Results The mean postoperative residual astigmatism was significantly lower in group 1 versus group 2 (−0.357±0.128 and −0.538±0.225 D, respectively; P=0.015). A significantly higher decrease in astigmatism was noted in group 1 (−0.93±0.18 and −0.38±0.69 D, respectively; P=0.006), with no significant difference in postoperative visual acuity. Paired comparison revealed significant decrease in astigmatism (P<0.0001 in group 1 and 0.04 in group 2) and improvement in uncorrected visual acuity (P<0.0001 for both groups). A significantly higher percentage of success was noted in group 1 (P=0.017), with a higher difference vector in group 2 (P=0.008). Conclusion Our results suggest that both toric IOL and paired corneal incision are efficient methods for postoperative astigmatism correction and achieving postoperative spectacle independence in patients with low-grade astigmatism. Toric IOL is superior in reducing postoperative astigmatism, reflecting more consistent results. The recommendation of IOL type and astigmatism correction should be tailored according to the patient’s requirements, especially with the expanded need for good intermediate vision for everyday tasks that may benefit from enhanced IOLs.","PeriodicalId":31572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toric intraocular lenses versus paired opposite corneal incisions in correction of low-grade astigmatism after phacoemulsification: a comparative study\",\"authors\":\"W. Ebeid, Noureldin Abozeid\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ejos.ejos_102_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose To compare toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation versus monofocal (Eyhance) IOL with paired corneal incisions for correction of low-grade astigmatism after phacoemulsification. Patients and methods A retrospective comparative study included 30 patients with low-grade astigmatism (−0.75 to −1.50 D) who underwent phacoemulsification: group 1 underwent toric IOL implantation (TECNIS toric) and group 2 underwent enhanced monofocal IOL (TECNIS Eyhance) with paired corneal incision along steep corneal meridian. Best-corrected visual acuity, astigmatism power, and axis were assessed preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Vector analysis of astigmatism was done using the Alpins method. Results The mean postoperative residual astigmatism was significantly lower in group 1 versus group 2 (−0.357±0.128 and −0.538±0.225 D, respectively; P=0.015). A significantly higher decrease in astigmatism was noted in group 1 (−0.93±0.18 and −0.38±0.69 D, respectively; P=0.006), with no significant difference in postoperative visual acuity. Paired comparison revealed significant decrease in astigmatism (P<0.0001 in group 1 and 0.04 in group 2) and improvement in uncorrected visual acuity (P<0.0001 for both groups). A significantly higher percentage of success was noted in group 1 (P=0.017), with a higher difference vector in group 2 (P=0.008). Conclusion Our results suggest that both toric IOL and paired corneal incision are efficient methods for postoperative astigmatism correction and achieving postoperative spectacle independence in patients with low-grade astigmatism. Toric IOL is superior in reducing postoperative astigmatism, reflecting more consistent results. The recommendation of IOL type and astigmatism correction should be tailored according to the patient’s requirements, especially with the expanded need for good intermediate vision for everyday tasks that may benefit from enhanced IOLs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejos.ejos_102_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejos.ejos_102_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较环形人工晶状体(IOL)植入术与单焦点(Eyhance)人工晶状体(IOL)配对角膜切口对超声乳化术后低度数散光的矫正效果。患者和方法回顾性比较研究30例低散光(- 0.75 ~ - 1.50 D)行超声乳化术的患者:1组行环形人工晶状体植入术(TECNIS toric), 2组行强化单焦点人工晶状体植入术(TECNIS Eyhance),沿角膜斜线行配对切口。术前和术后3个月分别评估最佳矫正视力、散光度数和轴距。采用Alpins方法对散光进行矢量分析。结果1组术后平均残余散光明显低于2组(分别为- 0.357±0.128 D和- 0.538±0.225 D);P = 0.015)。第1组患者散光下降幅度明显高于第1组(分别为- 0.93±0.18 D和- 0.38±0.69 D);P=0.006),两组术后视力差异无统计学意义。配对比较显示,患者散光明显降低(1组P<0.0001, 2组P< 0.04),未矫正视力明显改善(两组P<0.0001)。第1组的成功率明显较高(P=0.017),第2组的差异向量较高(P=0.008)。结论环形人工晶状体植入术和配对角膜切口植入术是低度数散光患者术后矫正散光、实现术后眼镜独立的有效方法。环面人工晶状体在减少术后散光方面优于环面人工晶状体,反映出更一致的结果。人工晶状体类型和散光矫正的推荐应根据患者的需求量身定制,特别是对日常工作中良好的中间视力的需求扩大,这可能受益于增强的人工晶状体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toric intraocular lenses versus paired opposite corneal incisions in correction of low-grade astigmatism after phacoemulsification: a comparative study
Purpose To compare toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation versus monofocal (Eyhance) IOL with paired corneal incisions for correction of low-grade astigmatism after phacoemulsification. Patients and methods A retrospective comparative study included 30 patients with low-grade astigmatism (−0.75 to −1.50 D) who underwent phacoemulsification: group 1 underwent toric IOL implantation (TECNIS toric) and group 2 underwent enhanced monofocal IOL (TECNIS Eyhance) with paired corneal incision along steep corneal meridian. Best-corrected visual acuity, astigmatism power, and axis were assessed preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Vector analysis of astigmatism was done using the Alpins method. Results The mean postoperative residual astigmatism was significantly lower in group 1 versus group 2 (−0.357±0.128 and −0.538±0.225 D, respectively; P=0.015). A significantly higher decrease in astigmatism was noted in group 1 (−0.93±0.18 and −0.38±0.69 D, respectively; P=0.006), with no significant difference in postoperative visual acuity. Paired comparison revealed significant decrease in astigmatism (P<0.0001 in group 1 and 0.04 in group 2) and improvement in uncorrected visual acuity (P<0.0001 for both groups). A significantly higher percentage of success was noted in group 1 (P=0.017), with a higher difference vector in group 2 (P=0.008). Conclusion Our results suggest that both toric IOL and paired corneal incision are efficient methods for postoperative astigmatism correction and achieving postoperative spectacle independence in patients with low-grade astigmatism. Toric IOL is superior in reducing postoperative astigmatism, reflecting more consistent results. The recommendation of IOL type and astigmatism correction should be tailored according to the patient’s requirements, especially with the expanded need for good intermediate vision for everyday tasks that may benefit from enhanced IOLs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信