{"title":"测试教学规范","authors":"Tatjana Winter, Elen Le Foll","doi":"10.1075/ijlcr.20021.win","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n English as a foreign language (EFL) textbooks typically present a prescriptive typology of three or four\n conditional types. We examine the extent to which this long-established English Language Teaching (ELT) typology is reflected in\n four varieties of English by comparing the forms and functions of four samples of 620 if-conditionals from French\n school EFL textbooks (TEC-Fr), French L1 Learner English (OpenCLC-Fr), Web English (EnTenTen15-S) and British English (BNC-S). The\n ELT typology accounts for considerably less than half of if-sentences in the reference data. Even in the EFL\n textbooks, only 57% of if-conditionals match the typology explicitly taught in their grammar sections. For many\n formal and functional features, the learner data sits halfway between the distributions of the textbook and reference data. We\n conclude that the ELT typology needs to be adapted to provide a more representative account of if-conditionals\n that focuses on L1 and L2 usage and meaning over form.","PeriodicalId":29715,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Learner Corpus Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing the pedagogical norm\",\"authors\":\"Tatjana Winter, Elen Le Foll\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ijlcr.20021.win\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n English as a foreign language (EFL) textbooks typically present a prescriptive typology of three or four\\n conditional types. We examine the extent to which this long-established English Language Teaching (ELT) typology is reflected in\\n four varieties of English by comparing the forms and functions of four samples of 620 if-conditionals from French\\n school EFL textbooks (TEC-Fr), French L1 Learner English (OpenCLC-Fr), Web English (EnTenTen15-S) and British English (BNC-S). The\\n ELT typology accounts for considerably less than half of if-sentences in the reference data. Even in the EFL\\n textbooks, only 57% of if-conditionals match the typology explicitly taught in their grammar sections. For many\\n formal and functional features, the learner data sits halfway between the distributions of the textbook and reference data. We\\n conclude that the ELT typology needs to be adapted to provide a more representative account of if-conditionals\\n that focuses on L1 and L2 usage and meaning over form.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Learner Corpus Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Learner Corpus Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.20021.win\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Learner Corpus Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.20021.win","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
English as a foreign language (EFL) textbooks typically present a prescriptive typology of three or four
conditional types. We examine the extent to which this long-established English Language Teaching (ELT) typology is reflected in
four varieties of English by comparing the forms and functions of four samples of 620 if-conditionals from French
school EFL textbooks (TEC-Fr), French L1 Learner English (OpenCLC-Fr), Web English (EnTenTen15-S) and British English (BNC-S). The
ELT typology accounts for considerably less than half of if-sentences in the reference data. Even in the EFL
textbooks, only 57% of if-conditionals match the typology explicitly taught in their grammar sections. For many
formal and functional features, the learner data sits halfway between the distributions of the textbook and reference data. We
conclude that the ELT typology needs to be adapted to provide a more representative account of if-conditionals
that focuses on L1 and L2 usage and meaning over form.