他们的霸权和他们的霸权

IF 0.3 4区哲学 N/A LITERATURE

PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Pub Date : 2021-06-17 DOI:10.5325/philrhet.54.2.0171

D. Cloud

{"title":"他们的霸权和他们的霸权","authors":"D. Cloud","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.54.2.0171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This essay explores the concept of hegemony as it is differently elaborated by Perry Anderson and Peter Thomas. I first provide an orientation to Gramsci’s theory of hegemony and how it has been taken up in cultural and rhetorical studies. Then I explore Anderson’s interventions into hegemony theory in the earlier Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci before a substantial review of The H-Word. I then discuss Peter Thomas’s critique of Anderson’s orientation to the hegemonic constructs of the ruling classes of nation-states and conclude with a discussion about how the concept of hegemony elaborated by these authors might productively extend the work we do as scholars of rhetoric.","PeriodicalId":46176,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Their Hegemony—and Theirs\",\"authors\":\"D. Cloud\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/philrhet.54.2.0171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:This essay explores the concept of hegemony as it is differently elaborated by Perry Anderson and Peter Thomas. I first provide an orientation to Gramsci’s theory of hegemony and how it has been taken up in cultural and rhetorical studies. Then I explore Anderson’s interventions into hegemony theory in the earlier Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci before a substantial review of The H-Word. I then discuss Peter Thomas’s critique of Anderson’s orientation to the hegemonic constructs of the ruling classes of nation-states and conclude with a discussion about how the concept of hegemony elaborated by these authors might productively extend the work we do as scholars of rhetoric.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.54.2.0171\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.54.2.0171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了佩里·安德森和彼得·托马斯对霸权概念的不同阐述。我首先为葛兰西的霸权理论提供了一个方向，以及它是如何被文化和修辞研究所采用的。然后，在对《h字》进行实质性的回顾之前，我探讨了安德森在早期《安东尼奥·葛兰西的二律法》中对霸权理论的干预。然后，我将讨论彼得·托马斯对安德森的民族国家统治阶级霸权建构取向的批评，并以讨论这些作者所阐述的霸权概念如何有效地扩展我们作为修辞学学者所做的工作作为结论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Their Hegemony—and Theirs

abstract:This essay explores the concept of hegemony as it is differently elaborated by Perry Anderson and Peter Thomas. I first provide an orientation to Gramsci’s theory of hegemony and how it has been taken up in cultural and rhetorical studies. Then I explore Anderson’s interventions into hegemony theory in the earlier Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci before a substantial review of The H-Word. I then discuss Peter Thomas’s critique of Anderson’s orientation to the hegemonic constructs of the ruling classes of nation-states and conclude with a discussion about how the concept of hegemony elaborated by these authors might productively extend the work we do as scholars of rhetoric.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Multiple-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Philosophy and Rhetoric is dedicated to publication of high-quality articles involving the relationship between philosophy and rhetoric. It has a longstanding commitment to interdisciplinary scholarship and welcomes all theoretical and methodological perspectives that advance the journal"s mission. Philosophy and Rhetoric invites articles on such topics as the relationship between logic and rhetoric, the philosophical aspects of argumentation, philosophical views on the nature of rhetoric held by historical figures and during historical periods, psychological and sociological studies of rhetoric with a strong philosophical emphasis, and philosophical analyses of the relationship to rhetoric of other areas of human culture and thought, political theory and law.