ACM道德与职业行为准则缺失了什么

Aaditeshwar Seth
{"title":"ACM道德与职业行为准则缺失了什么","authors":"Aaditeshwar Seth","doi":"10.1145/3588003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"avoid these harms. But understanding the goals of the system need not be a prerequisite for that. The ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct (CEPC) largely focuses on the second question—of uncovering harm, avoiding harm, and speaking out against harm—but does not say much about defining the goals of systems built by computing professionals. CEPC at best prescribes broad goals such as building systems for the “benefit of society,” or slightly more specific goals such as “promoting fundamental human rights” or Two questions that are often encountered when evaluating the ethics of a technology project are Who is your product or service meant to benefit? and Is somebody being harmed by your product or service? These questions require different frameworks to answer them. The first question requires clarity on the objectives of the technology system and consequently helps understand whose needs these objectives are meant to serve. Answering the second question, however, does not require clarity on the goals of the system. If harms being caused by the system can be identified, then T What’s Missing in the ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct","PeriodicalId":73404,"journal":{"name":"Interactions (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"30 1","pages":"44 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What's Missing in the ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct\",\"authors\":\"Aaditeshwar Seth\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3588003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"avoid these harms. But understanding the goals of the system need not be a prerequisite for that. The ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct (CEPC) largely focuses on the second question—of uncovering harm, avoiding harm, and speaking out against harm—but does not say much about defining the goals of systems built by computing professionals. CEPC at best prescribes broad goals such as building systems for the “benefit of society,” or slightly more specific goals such as “promoting fundamental human rights” or Two questions that are often encountered when evaluating the ethics of a technology project are Who is your product or service meant to benefit? and Is somebody being harmed by your product or service? These questions require different frameworks to answer them. The first question requires clarity on the objectives of the technology system and consequently helps understand whose needs these objectives are meant to serve. Answering the second question, however, does not require clarity on the goals of the system. If harms being caused by the system can be identified, then T What’s Missing in the ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct\",\"PeriodicalId\":73404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interactions (New York, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"44 - 47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interactions (New York, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3588003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactions (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3588003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

避免这些伤害。但理解系统的目标并不一定是实现这一目标的先决条件。ACM道德与职业行为准则(CEPC)主要关注第二个问题——发现伤害、避免伤害和公开反对伤害——但并没有对定义由计算机专业人员构建的系统的目标说太多。CEPC充其量规定了一些宽泛的目标,比如建立“造福社会”的体系,或者稍微具体一些的目标,比如“促进基本人权”。在评估一个技术项目的伦理性时,经常会遇到两个问题:你的产品或服务旨在造福谁?是否有人因为你的产品或服务而受到伤害?这些问题需要不同的框架来回答。第一个问题要求明确技术系统的目标,从而有助于了解这些目标是为谁的需要服务的。然而,回答第二个问题并不需要明确该系统的目标。如果可以确定该系统造成的危害,那么请了解ACM道德与职业行为准则中缺失的内容
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What's Missing in the ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct
avoid these harms. But understanding the goals of the system need not be a prerequisite for that. The ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct (CEPC) largely focuses on the second question—of uncovering harm, avoiding harm, and speaking out against harm—but does not say much about defining the goals of systems built by computing professionals. CEPC at best prescribes broad goals such as building systems for the “benefit of society,” or slightly more specific goals such as “promoting fundamental human rights” or Two questions that are often encountered when evaluating the ethics of a technology project are Who is your product or service meant to benefit? and Is somebody being harmed by your product or service? These questions require different frameworks to answer them. The first question requires clarity on the objectives of the technology system and consequently helps understand whose needs these objectives are meant to serve. Answering the second question, however, does not require clarity on the goals of the system. If harms being caused by the system can be identified, then T What’s Missing in the ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信