平等主义论战的出现:威廉·沃尔温,合作创作与激进认同,1645 - 167

IF 0.6 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Gary S De Krey
{"title":"平等主义论战的出现:威廉·沃尔温,合作创作与激进认同,1645 - 167","authors":"Gary S De Krey","doi":"10.1093/hisres/htad003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article investigates Leveller prehistory by analysing three polemical tracts of 1646–7. William Walwyn and Richard Overton arguably collaborated in the Remonstrance of Many Thousand Citizens and in the New Found Stratagem Framed in the Old Forge of Machivilisme, as well as in the Warning to All the Counties of England. Their denunciations of the dominant Presbyterian faction supported the independent alliance; but they employed distinctive language too extreme for many independents, pointing to their increasing political ambiguity. Their collaboration challenges scholarly characterizations of Walwyn’s ‘gentle’ style. The essay concludes by examining the related emergence of London, army and county radicals, some of whom would soon become Levellers.","PeriodicalId":13059,"journal":{"name":"Historical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The emergence of Leveller polemic: William Walwyn, collaborative authorship and radical identity, 1645–7\",\"authors\":\"Gary S De Krey\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/hisres/htad003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article investigates Leveller prehistory by analysing three polemical tracts of 1646–7. William Walwyn and Richard Overton arguably collaborated in the Remonstrance of Many Thousand Citizens and in the New Found Stratagem Framed in the Old Forge of Machivilisme, as well as in the Warning to All the Counties of England. Their denunciations of the dominant Presbyterian faction supported the independent alliance; but they employed distinctive language too extreme for many independents, pointing to their increasing political ambiguity. Their collaboration challenges scholarly characterizations of Walwyn’s ‘gentle’ style. The essay concludes by examining the related emergence of London, army and county radicals, some of whom would soon become Levellers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historical Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1090\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/hisres/htad003\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hisres/htad003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过分析1646年至1647年的三篇争论文章来研究Leveller史前史。威廉·沃尔温(William Walwyn)和理查德·奥弗顿(Richard Overton。他们对占主导地位的长老会派系的谴责支持了独立联盟;但他们使用的独特语言对许多独立人士来说过于极端,这表明他们在政治上越来越模糊。他们的合作挑战了学术界对沃尔温“温和”风格的描述。文章最后考察了伦敦、军队和郡激进分子的相关出现,其中一些人很快就会成为Levellers。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The emergence of Leveller polemic: William Walwyn, collaborative authorship and radical identity, 1645–7
This article investigates Leveller prehistory by analysing three polemical tracts of 1646–7. William Walwyn and Richard Overton arguably collaborated in the Remonstrance of Many Thousand Citizens and in the New Found Stratagem Framed in the Old Forge of Machivilisme, as well as in the Warning to All the Counties of England. Their denunciations of the dominant Presbyterian faction supported the independent alliance; but they employed distinctive language too extreme for many independents, pointing to their increasing political ambiguity. Their collaboration challenges scholarly characterizations of Walwyn’s ‘gentle’ style. The essay concludes by examining the related emergence of London, army and county radicals, some of whom would soon become Levellers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Since 1923, Historical Research has been a leading mainstream British historical journal. Its articles cover a wide geographical and temporal span: from the early middle ages to the twentieth century. It encourages the submission of articles from a broad variety of approaches, including social, political, urban, intellectual and cultural history.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信