提供原业权契据的责任:修订《物业转易及物业条例》第13A条的个案

H. Liu
{"title":"提供原业权契据的责任:修订《物业转易及物业条例》第13A条的个案","authors":"H. Liu","doi":"10.1177/14737795211066938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Hong Kong, a transaction for the sale and purchase of land imposes a duty on the vendor to supply original title deeds upon completion. If this duty is breached, the purchaser would be entitled to refuse completion. Yet, much confusion has arisen over the precise requirements of this duty, given that it is thought to originate from two distinct sources: the common law, and s.13A of the Conveyancing and Property Ordinance (Cap.219). It is suggested that the current common law position is based on a misunderstanding of s.13A, and that the current statutory position under s.13A is not aligned with the normative rationale of the duty. As such, it is necessary to amend s.13A. When considering the substance of the amendment, the Hong Kong Legislative Council (“LegCo”) ought to ensure that the scope of the duty is aligned with its normative rationale, that the law is sufficiently certain, and that vendors who have relied on the current position would not be retrospectively prejudiced.","PeriodicalId":87174,"journal":{"name":"Common law world review","volume":"51 1","pages":"61 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The duty to supply original title deeds: a case for reforming s.13A of the Conveyancing and Property Ordinance\",\"authors\":\"H. Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14737795211066938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Hong Kong, a transaction for the sale and purchase of land imposes a duty on the vendor to supply original title deeds upon completion. If this duty is breached, the purchaser would be entitled to refuse completion. Yet, much confusion has arisen over the precise requirements of this duty, given that it is thought to originate from two distinct sources: the common law, and s.13A of the Conveyancing and Property Ordinance (Cap.219). It is suggested that the current common law position is based on a misunderstanding of s.13A, and that the current statutory position under s.13A is not aligned with the normative rationale of the duty. As such, it is necessary to amend s.13A. When considering the substance of the amendment, the Hong Kong Legislative Council (“LegCo”) ought to ensure that the scope of the duty is aligned with its normative rationale, that the law is sufficiently certain, and that vendors who have relied on the current position would not be retrospectively prejudiced.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Common law world review\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"61 - 82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Common law world review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14737795211066938\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Common law world review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14737795211066938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在香港,买卖土地的交易规定卖方有责任在完成后提供原业权契据。如果违反了这一义务,买方有权拒绝完工。然而,鉴于这项责任被认为源自两个不同的来源:普通法和《物业转易及财产条例》(第219章)第13A条,人们对这项责任的确切要求产生了很大的困惑,第13A条下的现行法定立场与该义务的规范性理由不一致。因此,有需要修订第13A条。香港立法会(“立法会”)在考虑修订的实质内容时,应确保有关责任的范围与其规范的理据一致,确保法律有足够的确定性,并确保依赖现时情况的供应商不会受到追溯性的损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The duty to supply original title deeds: a case for reforming s.13A of the Conveyancing and Property Ordinance
In Hong Kong, a transaction for the sale and purchase of land imposes a duty on the vendor to supply original title deeds upon completion. If this duty is breached, the purchaser would be entitled to refuse completion. Yet, much confusion has arisen over the precise requirements of this duty, given that it is thought to originate from two distinct sources: the common law, and s.13A of the Conveyancing and Property Ordinance (Cap.219). It is suggested that the current common law position is based on a misunderstanding of s.13A, and that the current statutory position under s.13A is not aligned with the normative rationale of the duty. As such, it is necessary to amend s.13A. When considering the substance of the amendment, the Hong Kong Legislative Council (“LegCo”) ought to ensure that the scope of the duty is aligned with its normative rationale, that the law is sufficiently certain, and that vendors who have relied on the current position would not be retrospectively prejudiced.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信