欧洲中心主义与当代社会科学

Q4 Social Sciences
L. Keita
{"title":"欧洲中心主义与当代社会科学","authors":"L. Keita","doi":"10.57054/ad.v45i2.641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nThe contemporary social sciences emerged in the West from the eighteenth century as new modes of technology and scientific research developed. There is no doubt that technological advances led to the triumph of empiricism over metaphysics. This was the basis for the transformation of the nomenclatures of natural philosophy and moral philosophy into natural science and moral science respectively. As the empiricist methodologies of the natural sciences became successful, the social sciences chose to emulate their techniques. Thus, the methodological claim was made that that the social sciences and their division of labour compartmentalisation of the social world reflected that world in objectivist terms. But the fact that humans themselves were involved in describing and explaining the behaviours of other humans meant that a subjective element would be always be involved unless serious attempts were made for cognitive correctives and a self-conscious regard for consistent objectivity. While research in archaeology is relatively objective in its scientific findings, this is not the case with the other social sciences – especially anthropology and history. There has been an arbitrary Eurocentric creation and reification of theories and terms founded on whimsical and unsupported claims concerning the evolutionary status of Homo sapiens Africanus. \n \n \n \n \n \n \nLansana Keita, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Email: keitalans7@gmail.com \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":39851,"journal":{"name":"Africa Development/Afrique et Developpement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"2 - Eurocentrism and the Contemporary Social Sciences\",\"authors\":\"L. Keita\",\"doi\":\"10.57054/ad.v45i2.641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\nThe contemporary social sciences emerged in the West from the eighteenth century as new modes of technology and scientific research developed. There is no doubt that technological advances led to the triumph of empiricism over metaphysics. This was the basis for the transformation of the nomenclatures of natural philosophy and moral philosophy into natural science and moral science respectively. As the empiricist methodologies of the natural sciences became successful, the social sciences chose to emulate their techniques. Thus, the methodological claim was made that that the social sciences and their division of labour compartmentalisation of the social world reflected that world in objectivist terms. But the fact that humans themselves were involved in describing and explaining the behaviours of other humans meant that a subjective element would be always be involved unless serious attempts were made for cognitive correctives and a self-conscious regard for consistent objectivity. While research in archaeology is relatively objective in its scientific findings, this is not the case with the other social sciences – especially anthropology and history. There has been an arbitrary Eurocentric creation and reification of theories and terms founded on whimsical and unsupported claims concerning the evolutionary status of Homo sapiens Africanus. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nLansana Keita, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Email: keitalans7@gmail.com \\n \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":39851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Africa Development/Afrique et Developpement\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Africa Development/Afrique et Developpement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57054/ad.v45i2.641\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa Development/Afrique et Developpement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57054/ad.v45i2.641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着技术和科学研究的新模式的发展,当代社会科学从18世纪开始在西方出现。毫无疑问,技术进步导致了经验主义对形而上学的胜利。这是自然哲学和道德哲学的命名分别转化为自然科学和道德科学的基础。随着自然科学的经验主义方法论取得成功,社会科学选择效仿它们的技术。因此,方法论上的主张是,社会科学及其劳动分工对社会世界的划分反映了客观主义的世界。但事实上,人类自己也参与了描述和解释他人的行为,这意味着,除非认真尝试认知纠正,并自觉地考虑到始终如一的客观性,否则主观因素总是会涉及其中。虽然考古学的研究在其科学发现上是相对客观的,但其他社会科学——尤其是人类学和历史学——却并非如此。有一种武断的以欧洲为中心的创造和具体化的理论和术语,建立在关于非洲智人进化地位的异想天开和没有证据的主张上。Lansana Keita,尼日利亚伊巴丹大学。电子邮件:keitalans7@gmail.com
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
2 - Eurocentrism and the Contemporary Social Sciences
The contemporary social sciences emerged in the West from the eighteenth century as new modes of technology and scientific research developed. There is no doubt that technological advances led to the triumph of empiricism over metaphysics. This was the basis for the transformation of the nomenclatures of natural philosophy and moral philosophy into natural science and moral science respectively. As the empiricist methodologies of the natural sciences became successful, the social sciences chose to emulate their techniques. Thus, the methodological claim was made that that the social sciences and their division of labour compartmentalisation of the social world reflected that world in objectivist terms. But the fact that humans themselves were involved in describing and explaining the behaviours of other humans meant that a subjective element would be always be involved unless serious attempts were made for cognitive correctives and a self-conscious regard for consistent objectivity. While research in archaeology is relatively objective in its scientific findings, this is not the case with the other social sciences – especially anthropology and history. There has been an arbitrary Eurocentric creation and reification of theories and terms founded on whimsical and unsupported claims concerning the evolutionary status of Homo sapiens Africanus. Lansana Keita, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Email: keitalans7@gmail.com
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Africa Development/Afrique et Developpement
Africa Development/Afrique et Developpement Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Africa Development (ISSN 0850 3907) is the quarterly bilingual journal of CODESRIA published since 1976. It is a social science journal whose major focus is on issues which are central to the development of society. Its principal objective is to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas among African scholars from a variety of intellectual persuasions and various disciplines. The journal also encourages other contributors working on Africa or those undertaking comparative analysis of developing world issues. Africa Development welcomes contributions which cut across disciplinary boundaries. Articles with a narrow focus and incomprehensible to people outside their discipline are unlikely to be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信