一种提高导航系统可靠性的集成自适应卡尔曼滤波器

IF 1.2 Q4 REMOTE SENSING
A. Almagbile, Jinling Wang, A. Al-Rawabdeh
{"title":"一种提高导航系统可靠性的集成自适应卡尔曼滤波器","authors":"A. Almagbile, Jinling Wang, A. Al-Rawabdeh","doi":"10.1515/jag-2022-0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Integrated GPS/INS using Kalman filter is the best technique for improving navigation accuracy. Assuming that the covariance matrices are known and constant, a conventional Kalman filter (CKF) is usually used, however, when they are unknown and time-varying, several adaptive estimation approaches have to be developed to estimate the statistical information of the measurement (R), process (Q), and state (P) covariance matrices. In many situations, blunders/faults in the measurement model and/or sudden changes in the dynamic model may occur during the navigation period. Therefore, the CKF, as well as the adaptive Kalman filter (AKF) will exhibit abnormal behavior and may lead the filter to be suboptimal or even diverge. In this study, the Sage-Husa adaptive Kalman filter (SHAKF) and innovation-based adaptive Kalman filter (IAKF) approaches are employed for adapting the measurement covariance matrix(R). In the case of abrupt changes in the dynamic model, the state covariance matrix (P) is adapted using the strong tracking filter (STF). The performance of these adaptive approaches is evaluated before and after simulating a fault of different sizes in the measurement and dynamic models. The results show that with a large window width, the SHAKF outperforms the CKF and IAKF. However, when the system encounters any fault either in the measurement or dynamic model, the SHAKF loses its optimality and diverges. The sensitivity of the SHAKF to the fault is because the R matrix accumulates with the propagation of the recursive noise estimator. On the other hand, the IAKF and STF provide better performance than both the CKF and SHAKF because the gain matrix is adaptively adjusted to mitigate the influence of the fault, and therefore, they behave normally when a fault of any size occurs in the measurement and/or dynamic model.","PeriodicalId":45494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Geodesy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An integrated adaptive Kalman filter for improving the reliability of navigation systems\",\"authors\":\"A. Almagbile, Jinling Wang, A. Al-Rawabdeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jag-2022-0048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Integrated GPS/INS using Kalman filter is the best technique for improving navigation accuracy. Assuming that the covariance matrices are known and constant, a conventional Kalman filter (CKF) is usually used, however, when they are unknown and time-varying, several adaptive estimation approaches have to be developed to estimate the statistical information of the measurement (R), process (Q), and state (P) covariance matrices. In many situations, blunders/faults in the measurement model and/or sudden changes in the dynamic model may occur during the navigation period. Therefore, the CKF, as well as the adaptive Kalman filter (AKF) will exhibit abnormal behavior and may lead the filter to be suboptimal or even diverge. In this study, the Sage-Husa adaptive Kalman filter (SHAKF) and innovation-based adaptive Kalman filter (IAKF) approaches are employed for adapting the measurement covariance matrix(R). In the case of abrupt changes in the dynamic model, the state covariance matrix (P) is adapted using the strong tracking filter (STF). The performance of these adaptive approaches is evaluated before and after simulating a fault of different sizes in the measurement and dynamic models. The results show that with a large window width, the SHAKF outperforms the CKF and IAKF. However, when the system encounters any fault either in the measurement or dynamic model, the SHAKF loses its optimality and diverges. The sensitivity of the SHAKF to the fault is because the R matrix accumulates with the propagation of the recursive noise estimator. On the other hand, the IAKF and STF provide better performance than both the CKF and SHAKF because the gain matrix is adaptively adjusted to mitigate the influence of the fault, and therefore, they behave normally when a fault of any size occurs in the measurement and/or dynamic model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Geodesy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Geodesy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2022-0048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REMOTE SENSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2022-0048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

利用卡尔曼滤波技术集成GPS/INS是提高导航精度的最佳技术。假设协方差矩阵是已知且恒定的,通常使用传统的卡尔曼滤波(CKF),然而,当协方差矩阵是未知且时变时,必须开发几种自适应估计方法来估计测量(R)、过程(Q)和状态(P)协方差矩阵的统计信息。在许多情况下,在导航期间可能会出现测量模型的错误/故障和/或动态模型的突然变化。因此,CKF以及自适应卡尔曼滤波器(AKF)都会表现出异常行为,并可能导致滤波器次优甚至发散。本研究采用Sage-Husa自适应卡尔曼滤波(SHAKF)和基于创新的自适应卡尔曼滤波(IAKF)方法自适应测量协方差矩阵(R)。在动态模型发生突变的情况下,使用强跟踪滤波器(STF)调整状态协方差矩阵(P)。在测量模型和动态模型中,对这些自适应方法在模拟不同大小故障前后的性能进行了评价。结果表明,在较大的窗宽下,SHAKF算法优于CKF算法和IAKF算法。然而,当系统在测量模型或动态模型中遇到任何故障时,SHAKF将失去其最优性并发散。SHAKF对故障的敏感性是因为R矩阵随着递归噪声估计器的传播而累积。另一方面,IAKF和STF比CKF和SHAKF提供更好的性能,因为增益矩阵自适应调整以减轻故障的影响,因此,当测量和/或动态模型中发生任何大小的故障时,它们表现正常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An integrated adaptive Kalman filter for improving the reliability of navigation systems
Abstract Integrated GPS/INS using Kalman filter is the best technique for improving navigation accuracy. Assuming that the covariance matrices are known and constant, a conventional Kalman filter (CKF) is usually used, however, when they are unknown and time-varying, several adaptive estimation approaches have to be developed to estimate the statistical information of the measurement (R), process (Q), and state (P) covariance matrices. In many situations, blunders/faults in the measurement model and/or sudden changes in the dynamic model may occur during the navigation period. Therefore, the CKF, as well as the adaptive Kalman filter (AKF) will exhibit abnormal behavior and may lead the filter to be suboptimal or even diverge. In this study, the Sage-Husa adaptive Kalman filter (SHAKF) and innovation-based adaptive Kalman filter (IAKF) approaches are employed for adapting the measurement covariance matrix(R). In the case of abrupt changes in the dynamic model, the state covariance matrix (P) is adapted using the strong tracking filter (STF). The performance of these adaptive approaches is evaluated before and after simulating a fault of different sizes in the measurement and dynamic models. The results show that with a large window width, the SHAKF outperforms the CKF and IAKF. However, when the system encounters any fault either in the measurement or dynamic model, the SHAKF loses its optimality and diverges. The sensitivity of the SHAKF to the fault is because the R matrix accumulates with the propagation of the recursive noise estimator. On the other hand, the IAKF and STF provide better performance than both the CKF and SHAKF because the gain matrix is adaptively adjusted to mitigate the influence of the fault, and therefore, they behave normally when a fault of any size occurs in the measurement and/or dynamic model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Geodesy
Journal of Applied Geodesy REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信