真相的空间:巴勒斯坦难民妇女对耶路撒冷的关注和抵制犹太化

IF 1 4区社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Journal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI:10.3366/HLPS.2018.0190

L. Khoury

{"title":"真相的空间:巴勒斯坦难民妇女对耶路撒冷的关注和抵制犹太化","authors":"L. Khoury","doi":"10.3366/HLPS.2018.0190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the third Intifada (2014–2015) onward, refugee Nakba-generation women reframed concerns over Shu'fat refugee camp space in response to newer settler-colonial and spatial Judaisation practices in Al-Quds/Jerusalem; created a different relationality of space/time; gave accounts that are closer to the present, made the present a driving force for their action; transformed the courtyard (hosh) experience into a community bonding function; and created a new layer of resistance. The Nakba narratives were conveyed as part of the present, their belonging to Jerusalem became the ‘truth of space’, and their visual memory overcame the ‘true now space’. Ultimately, their memory was a potential for creative collaboration between present consciousness and experiences of the past creating a ‘relational solidarity in the living present’.","PeriodicalId":41690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spaces of Truth: Palestinian Refugee Women Reframe Concerns of Jerusalem and Resist Judaisation\",\"authors\":\"L. Khoury\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/HLPS.2018.0190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the third Intifada (2014–2015) onward, refugee Nakba-generation women reframed concerns over Shu'fat refugee camp space in response to newer settler-colonial and spatial Judaisation practices in Al-Quds/Jerusalem; created a different relationality of space/time; gave accounts that are closer to the present, made the present a driving force for their action; transformed the courtyard (hosh) experience into a community bonding function; and created a new layer of resistance. The Nakba narratives were conveyed as part of the present, their belonging to Jerusalem became the ‘truth of space’, and their visual memory overcame the ‘true now space’. Ultimately, their memory was a potential for creative collaboration between present consciousness and experiences of the past creating a ‘relational solidarity in the living present’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/HLPS.2018.0190\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/HLPS.2018.0190","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

自第三次起义（2014-2015年）以来，难民Nakba一代妇女重新定义了对Shu’fat难民营空间的担忧，以回应圣城/耶路撒冷新的定居者殖民和空间犹太化做法；创造了一种不同的空间/时间关系；给出了更接近当下的叙述，使当下成为他们行动的动力；将庭院（hosh）体验转化为社区纽带功能；并创造了一层新的阻力。Nakba叙事作为当下的一部分被传达，他们对耶路撒冷的归属成为了“空间的真相”，他们的视觉记忆克服了“真实的当下空间”。最终，他们的记忆是当前意识和过去经历之间创造性合作的潜力，创造了“活在当下的关系团结”。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Spaces of Truth: Palestinian Refugee Women Reframe Concerns of Jerusalem and Resist Judaisation

Since the third Intifada (2014–2015) onward, refugee Nakba-generation women reframed concerns over Shu'fat refugee camp space in response to newer settler-colonial and spatial Judaisation practices in Al-Quds/Jerusalem; created a different relationality of space/time; gave accounts that are closer to the present, made the present a driving force for their action; transformed the courtyard (hosh) experience into a community bonding function; and created a new layer of resistance. The Nakba narratives were conveyed as part of the present, their belonging to Jerusalem became the ‘truth of space’, and their visual memory overcame the ‘true now space’. Ultimately, their memory was a potential for creative collaboration between present consciousness and experiences of the past creating a ‘relational solidarity in the living present’.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

50.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies (formerly Holy Land Studies: A Multidisciplinary Journal) was founded in 2002 as a fully refereed international journal. It publishes new, stimulating and provocative ideas on Palestine, Israel and the wider Middle East, paying particular attention to issues that have a contemporary relevance and a wider public interest. The journal draws upon expertise from virtually all relevant disciplines: history, politics, culture, literature, archaeology, geography, economics, religion, linguistics, biblical studies, sociology and anthropology. The journal deals with a wide range of topics: ‘two nations’ and ‘three faiths’; conflicting Israeli and Palestinian perspectives; social and economic conditions; religion and politics in the Middle East; Palestine in history and today; ecumenism, and interfaith relations; modernisation and postmodernism; religious revivalisms and fundamentalisms; Zionism, Neo-Zionism, Christian Zionism, anti-Zionism and Post-Zionism; theologies of liberation in Palestine and Israel; colonialism, imperialism, settler-colonialism, post-colonialism and decolonisation; ‘History from below’ and Subaltern studies; ‘One-state’ and Two States’ solutions in Palestine and Israel; Crusader studies, Genocide studies and Holocaust studies. Conventionally these diversified discourses are kept apart. This multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary journal brings them together.