荷兰语姿势动词是词汇成分还是功能成分?

Q2 Arts and Humanities
I. Mulders
{"title":"荷兰语姿势动词是词汇成分还是功能成分?","authors":"I. Mulders","doi":"10.1075/avt.00049.mul","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In Dutch, posture verbs like liggen ‘lie’ and staan ‘stand’ are obligatorily\n used in locative constructions with inanimate subjects, classifying the spatial Figure-Ground relation. Prima facie, in this use,\n posture verbs seem more like functional elements than like lexical verbs.\n This paper investigates processing of Dutch posture verbs in a reference resolution task in the visual world\n paradigm, to get more clarity on the nature of these verbs. We know that lexical verbs like rinkelen ‘ring’ cause\n anticipatory looks towards a matching target referent like telefoon ‘telephone’; and that they suppress looks to\n a phonological competitor like telescoop ‘telescope’. The functional property of grammatical gender on\n determiners (de vs. het) is less robust in directing looks. When it comes to anticipating the\n target referent, and suppressing looks to a phonological competitor, do posture verbs pattern with lexical verbs, or with\n functional elements like grammatical gender?","PeriodicalId":35138,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics in the Netherlands","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Dutch posture verbs lexical or functional elements?\",\"authors\":\"I. Mulders\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/avt.00049.mul\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In Dutch, posture verbs like liggen ‘lie’ and staan ‘stand’ are obligatorily\\n used in locative constructions with inanimate subjects, classifying the spatial Figure-Ground relation. Prima facie, in this use,\\n posture verbs seem more like functional elements than like lexical verbs.\\n This paper investigates processing of Dutch posture verbs in a reference resolution task in the visual world\\n paradigm, to get more clarity on the nature of these verbs. We know that lexical verbs like rinkelen ‘ring’ cause\\n anticipatory looks towards a matching target referent like telefoon ‘telephone’; and that they suppress looks to\\n a phonological competitor like telescoop ‘telescope’. The functional property of grammatical gender on\\n determiners (de vs. het) is less robust in directing looks. When it comes to anticipating the\\n target referent, and suppressing looks to a phonological competitor, do posture verbs pattern with lexical verbs, or with\\n functional elements like grammatical gender?\",\"PeriodicalId\":35138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistics in the Netherlands\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistics in the Netherlands\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00049.mul\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics in the Netherlands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00049.mul","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在荷兰语中,像liggen“lie”和staan“stand”这样的姿势动词被强制用于带有无生命主语的方位结构,从而对空间图形-地面关系进行分类。初步看来,在这种用法中,姿势动词似乎更像是功能元素,而不是词汇动词。本文研究了视觉世界范式中荷兰语姿势动词在指称解析任务中的处理,以更清楚地了解这些动词的性质。我们知道,像rinkelen“ring”这样的词汇动词会导致对telefoon“phone”这样的匹配目标指称的预期目光;它们抑制的现象在语音竞争对手看来像telecoop的“望远镜”。语法性别在限定词上的功能性质(de vs.het)在引导表情方面不那么稳健。当涉及到预测目标指称,并抑制语音竞争对手的表情时,姿势动词是与词汇动词形成模式,还是与语法性别等功能元素形成模式?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are Dutch posture verbs lexical or functional elements?
In Dutch, posture verbs like liggen ‘lie’ and staan ‘stand’ are obligatorily used in locative constructions with inanimate subjects, classifying the spatial Figure-Ground relation. Prima facie, in this use, posture verbs seem more like functional elements than like lexical verbs. This paper investigates processing of Dutch posture verbs in a reference resolution task in the visual world paradigm, to get more clarity on the nature of these verbs. We know that lexical verbs like rinkelen ‘ring’ cause anticipatory looks towards a matching target referent like telefoon ‘telephone’; and that they suppress looks to a phonological competitor like telescoop ‘telescope’. The functional property of grammatical gender on determiners (de vs. het) is less robust in directing looks. When it comes to anticipating the target referent, and suppressing looks to a phonological competitor, do posture verbs pattern with lexical verbs, or with functional elements like grammatical gender?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistics in the Netherlands
Linguistics in the Netherlands Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Linguistics in the Netherlands is a series of annual publications, sponsored by the Dutch Linguistics Association (Algemene Vereniging voor Taalwetenschap) and published by John Benjamins Publishing Company since Volume 8 in 1991. Each volume contains a careful selection through peer review of papers presented at the annual meeting of the society. The aim of the annual meeting is to provide members with an opportunity to report on their work in progress. Each volume presents an overview of research in different fields of linguistics in the Netherlands containing articles on phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax and semantics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信