《我只属于我自己:勒达·拉法内利的生活与写作》作者:安德里亚·巴基泽(书评)

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Megan E. Cannella
{"title":"《我只属于我自己:勒达·拉法内利的生活与写作》作者:安德里亚·巴基泽(书评)","authors":"Megan E. Cannella","doi":"10.14321/JSTUDRADI.11.2.0209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indochinese counterparts. These conferences were organized by older, maternalist peace organizations (such as the United States– based Women Strike for Peace, the Canadian Voice of Women, and the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom), women’s liberation activists, and women of color based in both Canada and the United States. Interestingly enough, these conferences allowed the disagreements among Western women organizers to be aired out; paradoxically, these divisions fostered an even more vibrant women’s movement in the United States and Canada. But most importantly, as Wu astutely notes, the Vietnamese women initiated and cultivated connections with their Western counterparts, acted as political mentors, and promoted their political vision in which women of extremely different backgrounds could exchange ideas and build broad coalitions. Wu’s account helpfully complicates the history of international sisterhood as a feminist concept; in this revised narrative, at the International Women’s Conferences, international sisterhood did not mean that third world women needed to be “rescued” by their Western sisters, but instead they served as educators and political models to a factionalized, yet thriving, women’s liberation movement. This well-written book can be recommended reading in graduate and advanced undergraduate courses in history, African American studies, women’s studies, and international studies. In addition, given its fluid style and the measured use of academic jargon, the book can also be of interest to a general readership interested in the history of the Vietnam War.","PeriodicalId":39186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Study of Radicalism","volume":"11 1","pages":"209 - 211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"I Belong Only to Myself: The Life and Writings of Leda Rafanelli by Andrea Pakieser (review)\",\"authors\":\"Megan E. Cannella\",\"doi\":\"10.14321/JSTUDRADI.11.2.0209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Indochinese counterparts. These conferences were organized by older, maternalist peace organizations (such as the United States– based Women Strike for Peace, the Canadian Voice of Women, and the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom), women’s liberation activists, and women of color based in both Canada and the United States. Interestingly enough, these conferences allowed the disagreements among Western women organizers to be aired out; paradoxically, these divisions fostered an even more vibrant women’s movement in the United States and Canada. But most importantly, as Wu astutely notes, the Vietnamese women initiated and cultivated connections with their Western counterparts, acted as political mentors, and promoted their political vision in which women of extremely different backgrounds could exchange ideas and build broad coalitions. Wu’s account helpfully complicates the history of international sisterhood as a feminist concept; in this revised narrative, at the International Women’s Conferences, international sisterhood did not mean that third world women needed to be “rescued” by their Western sisters, but instead they served as educators and political models to a factionalized, yet thriving, women’s liberation movement. This well-written book can be recommended reading in graduate and advanced undergraduate courses in history, African American studies, women’s studies, and international studies. In addition, given its fluid style and the measured use of academic jargon, the book can also be of interest to a general readership interested in the history of the Vietnam War.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Study of Radicalism\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"209 - 211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Study of Radicalism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14321/JSTUDRADI.11.2.0209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Study of Radicalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/JSTUDRADI.11.2.0209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

这些会议是由年龄较大的母亲主义和平组织(如美国的妇女争取和平罢工、加拿大妇女之声和妇女国际和平与自由联盟)、妇女解放活动家和加拿大和美国的有色人种妇女组织的。有趣的是,这些会议让西方女性组织者之间的分歧得以公开;矛盾的是,这些分歧在美国和加拿大孕育了更加活跃的妇女运动。但最重要的是,正如吴敏锐地指出的那样,越南妇女发起并培养了与西方同行的联系,充当了政治导师,并促进了她们的政治愿景,在这种愿景中,背景截然不同的妇女可以交换思想,建立广泛的联盟。吴的描述有助于将国际姐妹情谊作为女权主义概念的历史复杂化;在这个修订后的叙述中,在国际妇女会议上,国际姐妹关系并不意味着第三世界的妇女需要西方姐妹的“拯救”,相反,她们充当了一场派别化但蓬勃发展的妇女解放运动的教育者和政治榜样。这本写得很好的书可以推荐读研究生和高级本科课程的历史,非裔美国人的研究,妇女研究,和国际研究。此外,由于其流畅的风格和严谨的学术术语的使用,这本书也可以引起对越南战争史感兴趣的普通读者的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
I Belong Only to Myself: The Life and Writings of Leda Rafanelli by Andrea Pakieser (review)
Indochinese counterparts. These conferences were organized by older, maternalist peace organizations (such as the United States– based Women Strike for Peace, the Canadian Voice of Women, and the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom), women’s liberation activists, and women of color based in both Canada and the United States. Interestingly enough, these conferences allowed the disagreements among Western women organizers to be aired out; paradoxically, these divisions fostered an even more vibrant women’s movement in the United States and Canada. But most importantly, as Wu astutely notes, the Vietnamese women initiated and cultivated connections with their Western counterparts, acted as political mentors, and promoted their political vision in which women of extremely different backgrounds could exchange ideas and build broad coalitions. Wu’s account helpfully complicates the history of international sisterhood as a feminist concept; in this revised narrative, at the International Women’s Conferences, international sisterhood did not mean that third world women needed to be “rescued” by their Western sisters, but instead they served as educators and political models to a factionalized, yet thriving, women’s liberation movement. This well-written book can be recommended reading in graduate and advanced undergraduate courses in history, African American studies, women’s studies, and international studies. In addition, given its fluid style and the measured use of academic jargon, the book can also be of interest to a general readership interested in the history of the Vietnam War.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Study of Radicalism
Journal of the Study of Radicalism Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信