两种亲缘关系密切的欧洲Sepsid蝇种混合物基因组信号的地理变异

IF 1.9 2区 生物学 Q3 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Evolutionary Biology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-25 DOI:10.1007/s11692-023-09612-5
Athene Giesen, Wolf U Blanckenhorn, Martin A Schäfer, Kentaro K Shimizu, Rie Shimizu-Inatsugi, Bernhard Misof, Lars Podsiadlowski, Oliver Niehuis, Heidi E L Lischer, Simon Aeschbacher, Martin Kapun
{"title":"两种亲缘关系密切的欧洲Sepsid蝇种混合物基因组信号的地理变异","authors":"Athene Giesen, Wolf U Blanckenhorn, Martin A Schäfer, Kentaro K Shimizu, Rie Shimizu-Inatsugi, Bernhard Misof, Lars Podsiadlowski, Oliver Niehuis, Heidi E L Lischer, Simon Aeschbacher, Martin Kapun","doi":"10.1007/s11692-023-09612-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The extent of interspecific gene flow and its consequences for the initiation, maintenance, and breakdown of species barriers in natural systems remain poorly understood. Interspecific gene flow by hybridization may weaken adaptive divergence, but can be overcome by selection against hybrids, which may ultimately promote reinforcement. An informative step towards understanding the role of gene flow during speciation is to describe patterns of past gene flow among extant species. We investigate signals of admixture between allopatric and sympatric populations of the two closely related European dung fly species <i>Sepsis cynipsea</i> and <i>S. neocynipsea</i> (Diptera: Sepsidae). Based on microsatellite genotypes, we first inferred a baseline demographic history using Approximate Bayesian Computation. We then used genomic data from pooled DNA of natural and laboratory populations to test for past interspecific gene flow based on allelic configurations discordant with the inferred population tree (ABBA-BABA test with <i>D</i>-statistic). Comparing the detected signals of gene flow with the contemporary geographic relationship among interspecific pairs of populations (sympatric vs. allopatric), we made two contrasting observations. At one site in the French Cevennes, we detected an excess of past interspecific gene flow, while at two sites in Switzerland we observed lower signals of past microsatellite genotypes gene flow among populations in sympatry compared to allopatric populations. These results suggest that the species boundaries between these two species depend on the past and/or present eco-geographic context in Europe, which indicates that there is no uniform link between contemporary geographic proximity and past interspecific gene flow in natural populations.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11692-023-09612-5.</p>","PeriodicalId":50471,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Biology","volume":" ","pages":"395-412"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geographic Variation in Genomic Signals of Admixture Between Two Closely Related European Sepsid Fly Species.\",\"authors\":\"Athene Giesen, Wolf U Blanckenhorn, Martin A Schäfer, Kentaro K Shimizu, Rie Shimizu-Inatsugi, Bernhard Misof, Lars Podsiadlowski, Oliver Niehuis, Heidi E L Lischer, Simon Aeschbacher, Martin Kapun\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11692-023-09612-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The extent of interspecific gene flow and its consequences for the initiation, maintenance, and breakdown of species barriers in natural systems remain poorly understood. Interspecific gene flow by hybridization may weaken adaptive divergence, but can be overcome by selection against hybrids, which may ultimately promote reinforcement. An informative step towards understanding the role of gene flow during speciation is to describe patterns of past gene flow among extant species. We investigate signals of admixture between allopatric and sympatric populations of the two closely related European dung fly species <i>Sepsis cynipsea</i> and <i>S. neocynipsea</i> (Diptera: Sepsidae). Based on microsatellite genotypes, we first inferred a baseline demographic history using Approximate Bayesian Computation. We then used genomic data from pooled DNA of natural and laboratory populations to test for past interspecific gene flow based on allelic configurations discordant with the inferred population tree (ABBA-BABA test with <i>D</i>-statistic). Comparing the detected signals of gene flow with the contemporary geographic relationship among interspecific pairs of populations (sympatric vs. allopatric), we made two contrasting observations. At one site in the French Cevennes, we detected an excess of past interspecific gene flow, while at two sites in Switzerland we observed lower signals of past microsatellite genotypes gene flow among populations in sympatry compared to allopatric populations. These results suggest that the species boundaries between these two species depend on the past and/or present eco-geographic context in Europe, which indicates that there is no uniform link between contemporary geographic proximity and past interspecific gene flow in natural populations.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11692-023-09612-5.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolutionary Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"395-412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10579158/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolutionary Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-023-09612-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-023-09612-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

种间基因流动的程度及其对自然系统中物种屏障的启动、维持和破坏的影响仍然知之甚少。杂交产生的种间基因流动可能会削弱适应性分化,但可以通过对抗杂交的选择来克服,这可能最终促进强化。了解基因流动在物种形成过程中的作用的一个重要步骤是描述过去现存物种之间基因流动的模式。我们研究了两个密切相关的欧洲粪蝇物种脓毒症和新脓毒症(双翅目:脓毒科)的异域和同域种群之间的混合信号。基于微卫星基因型,我们首先使用近似贝叶斯计算推断出基线人口统计学历史。然后,我们使用来自自然种群和实验室种群的汇总DNA的基因组数据,基于与推断的种群树不一致的等位基因配置来测试过去的种间基因流(aba - baba测试与d统计量)。将检测到的基因流动信号与当代种群间(同域与异域)的地理关系进行比较,我们得出了两个截然不同的观察结果。在法国塞文山脉的一个地点,我们检测到过去的种间基因流过量,而在瑞士的两个地点,我们观察到同域种群中过去微卫星基因型基因流的信号比异域种群低。这些结果表明,这两个物种之间的物种边界取决于欧洲过去和/或现在的生态地理环境,这表明当代地理邻近性与过去自然种群中种间基因流动之间没有统一的联系。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,可在10.1007/s11692-023-09612-5获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Geographic Variation in Genomic Signals of Admixture Between Two Closely Related European Sepsid Fly Species.

Geographic Variation in Genomic Signals of Admixture Between Two Closely Related European Sepsid Fly Species.

The extent of interspecific gene flow and its consequences for the initiation, maintenance, and breakdown of species barriers in natural systems remain poorly understood. Interspecific gene flow by hybridization may weaken adaptive divergence, but can be overcome by selection against hybrids, which may ultimately promote reinforcement. An informative step towards understanding the role of gene flow during speciation is to describe patterns of past gene flow among extant species. We investigate signals of admixture between allopatric and sympatric populations of the two closely related European dung fly species Sepsis cynipsea and S. neocynipsea (Diptera: Sepsidae). Based on microsatellite genotypes, we first inferred a baseline demographic history using Approximate Bayesian Computation. We then used genomic data from pooled DNA of natural and laboratory populations to test for past interspecific gene flow based on allelic configurations discordant with the inferred population tree (ABBA-BABA test with D-statistic). Comparing the detected signals of gene flow with the contemporary geographic relationship among interspecific pairs of populations (sympatric vs. allopatric), we made two contrasting observations. At one site in the French Cevennes, we detected an excess of past interspecific gene flow, while at two sites in Switzerland we observed lower signals of past microsatellite genotypes gene flow among populations in sympatry compared to allopatric populations. These results suggest that the species boundaries between these two species depend on the past and/or present eco-geographic context in Europe, which indicates that there is no uniform link between contemporary geographic proximity and past interspecific gene flow in natural populations.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11692-023-09612-5.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evolutionary Biology
Evolutionary Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim, scope, and format of Evolutionary Biology will be based on the following principles: Evolutionary Biology will publish original articles and reviews that address issues and subjects of core concern in evolutionary biology. All papers must make original contributions to our understanding of the evolutionary process. The journal will remain true to the original intent of the original series to provide a place for broad syntheses in evolutionary biology. Articles will contribute to this goal by defining the direction of current and future research and by building conceptual links between disciplines. In articles presenting an empirical analysis, the results of these analyses must be integrated within a broader evolutionary framework. Authors are encouraged to submit papers presenting novel conceptual frameworks or major challenges to accepted ideas. While brevity is encouraged, there is no formal restriction on length for major articles. The journal aims to keep the time between original submission and appearance online to within four months and will encourage authors to revise rapidly once a paper has been submitted and deemed acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信