《忏悔者圣马克西姆斯》第71条关于“玩逻各斯”的注解

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Scrinium Pub Date : 2021-07-29 DOI:10.1163/18177565-bja10046
Dmitry Kurdybaylo
{"title":"《忏悔者圣马克西姆斯》第71条关于“玩逻各斯”的注解","authors":"Dmitry Kurdybaylo","doi":"10.1163/18177565-bja10046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn the Ambigua to John 71, Maximus the Confessor discusses a passage of Gregory Nazianzen describing divine Logos that “plays in all kinds of forms.” The article emphasises four main approaches of the Ambiguum 71 to ‘acquit’ the image of ‘playful’ God. Firstly, St Maximus involves the hyperbolic language of Pseudo-Dionysius to indicate the superiority of divine ‘game’ over any kind of prudency or playfulness. Secondly, God’s playing can be discovered in His providence towards the sensible creations. The third step introduces all the material world as a God’s plaything, which can nevertheless be an object of natural contemplation. The fourth approach is merely moral, and its pathetic language conceals tensions between St Maximus’ and St Gregory’s patterns of thinking. Finally, all four parts are linked in a single structure derived from the triad “practical philosophy – natural contemplation – mystical theology,” which was often used by St Maximus.","PeriodicalId":38562,"journal":{"name":"Scrinium","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some Notes on “playing Logos” in Ambiguum 71 of St Maximus the Confessor\",\"authors\":\"Dmitry Kurdybaylo\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18177565-bja10046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nIn the Ambigua to John 71, Maximus the Confessor discusses a passage of Gregory Nazianzen describing divine Logos that “plays in all kinds of forms.” The article emphasises four main approaches of the Ambiguum 71 to ‘acquit’ the image of ‘playful’ God. Firstly, St Maximus involves the hyperbolic language of Pseudo-Dionysius to indicate the superiority of divine ‘game’ over any kind of prudency or playfulness. Secondly, God’s playing can be discovered in His providence towards the sensible creations. The third step introduces all the material world as a God’s plaything, which can nevertheless be an object of natural contemplation. The fourth approach is merely moral, and its pathetic language conceals tensions between St Maximus’ and St Gregory’s patterns of thinking. Finally, all four parts are linked in a single structure derived from the triad “practical philosophy – natural contemplation – mystical theology,” which was often used by St Maximus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scrinium\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scrinium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18177565-bja10046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scrinium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18177565-bja10046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在《约翰福音71章》中,忏悔者马克西姆斯讨论了格雷戈里·纳齐安岑描述“以各种形式发挥”的神圣逻各斯的一段话。文章强调了《圣经71章》“表现”“顽皮”上帝形象的四种主要方法。首先,圣马克西姆斯使用了伪酒神的夸张语言,以表明神圣的“游戏”优于任何形式的拘谨或嬉戏。其次,上帝的游戏可以在他对理性创造物的天意中发现。第三步介绍了作为上帝的玩物的所有物质世界,尽管如此,它仍然可以是自然沉思的对象。第四种方法仅仅是道德的,其可悲的语言掩盖了圣马克西姆斯和圣格雷戈里思维模式之间的紧张关系。最后,所有四个部分都连接在一个单一的结构中,该结构源于圣马克西姆斯经常使用的“实践哲学-自然沉思-神秘神学”三合一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Some Notes on “playing Logos” in Ambiguum 71 of St Maximus the Confessor
In the Ambigua to John 71, Maximus the Confessor discusses a passage of Gregory Nazianzen describing divine Logos that “plays in all kinds of forms.” The article emphasises four main approaches of the Ambiguum 71 to ‘acquit’ the image of ‘playful’ God. Firstly, St Maximus involves the hyperbolic language of Pseudo-Dionysius to indicate the superiority of divine ‘game’ over any kind of prudency or playfulness. Secondly, God’s playing can be discovered in His providence towards the sensible creations. The third step introduces all the material world as a God’s plaything, which can nevertheless be an object of natural contemplation. The fourth approach is merely moral, and its pathetic language conceals tensions between St Maximus’ and St Gregory’s patterns of thinking. Finally, all four parts are linked in a single structure derived from the triad “practical philosophy – natural contemplation – mystical theology,” which was often used by St Maximus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scrinium
Scrinium Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信