关于国家资产阶级关系的笔记。米利班德-普朗茨辩论与1998-2001年阿根廷危机

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
S. Salvia
{"title":"关于国家资产阶级关系的笔记。米利班德-普朗茨辩论与1998-2001年阿根廷危机","authors":"S. Salvia","doi":"10.7440/colombiaint108.2021.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Objective/Context : To advance in the conceptualization of the State-bourgeoisie relationship, the paper returns to a classic debate in the Marxist tradition on the capitalist State. Methodology : In methodological terms, we carry out a critical analysis of the works of Ralph Miliband and Nicos Poulantzas —especially on the distinction of class power and State power, relative autonomy and State intervention in the economy— and we revisit the criticism of John Holloway. With this, we seek to understand the relationship between State and bourgeoisie, to explain the economic and political crisis of the forms of the capital relationship in Argentina, in 1998-2001. Conclusions : We conclude that there is a crisis of a specific form of State intervention in the economy, based on the expansion of market discipline, and, with it, both State power and capital power erodes. Originality : The article analyzes the Miliband-Poulantzas debate and, based on this, builds an explanation of the Argentinean crisis.","PeriodicalId":35154,"journal":{"name":"Colombia Internacional","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Apuntes sobre la relación Estado-burguesía. El debate Miliband-Poulantzas y la crisis argentina de 1998-2001\",\"authors\":\"S. Salvia\",\"doi\":\"10.7440/colombiaint108.2021.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". Objective/Context : To advance in the conceptualization of the State-bourgeoisie relationship, the paper returns to a classic debate in the Marxist tradition on the capitalist State. Methodology : In methodological terms, we carry out a critical analysis of the works of Ralph Miliband and Nicos Poulantzas —especially on the distinction of class power and State power, relative autonomy and State intervention in the economy— and we revisit the criticism of John Holloway. With this, we seek to understand the relationship between State and bourgeoisie, to explain the economic and political crisis of the forms of the capital relationship in Argentina, in 1998-2001. Conclusions : We conclude that there is a crisis of a specific form of State intervention in the economy, based on the expansion of market discipline, and, with it, both State power and capital power erodes. Originality : The article analyzes the Miliband-Poulantzas debate and, based on this, builds an explanation of the Argentinean crisis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Colombia Internacional\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Colombia Internacional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint108.2021.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colombia Internacional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint108.2021.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/背景:为了推进国家资产阶级关系的概念化,本文回到了马克思主义传统中关于资本主义国家的经典辩论。方法论:在方法论方面,我们对拉尔夫·米利班德和尼科斯·普兰扎斯的作品进行了批判性分析,特别是关于阶级权力和国家权力的区别、相对自治和国家对经济的干预,并重新审视了约翰·霍洛威的批评。据此,我们试图理解国家和资产阶级之间的关系,解释1998-2001年阿根廷资本关系形式的经济和政治危机。结论:我们得出的结论是,在市场纪律扩张的基础上,存在着一种特定形式的国家干预经济的危机,随之而来的是国家权力和资本权力的侵蚀。原创:文章分析了米利班德·普兰扎斯的辩论,并在此基础上对阿根廷危机做出了解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Apuntes sobre la relación Estado-burguesía. El debate Miliband-Poulantzas y la crisis argentina de 1998-2001
. Objective/Context : To advance in the conceptualization of the State-bourgeoisie relationship, the paper returns to a classic debate in the Marxist tradition on the capitalist State. Methodology : In methodological terms, we carry out a critical analysis of the works of Ralph Miliband and Nicos Poulantzas —especially on the distinction of class power and State power, relative autonomy and State intervention in the economy— and we revisit the criticism of John Holloway. With this, we seek to understand the relationship between State and bourgeoisie, to explain the economic and political crisis of the forms of the capital relationship in Argentina, in 1998-2001. Conclusions : We conclude that there is a crisis of a specific form of State intervention in the economy, based on the expansion of market discipline, and, with it, both State power and capital power erodes. Originality : The article analyzes the Miliband-Poulantzas debate and, based on this, builds an explanation of the Argentinean crisis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Colombia Internacional
Colombia Internacional Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信