重复和琐碎化:对发言的回应

IF 0.4 0 PHILOSOPHY

Faith and Philosophy Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.37977/FAITHPHIL.2020.37.4.7

Tien-Chun Lo

{"title":"重复和琐碎化:对发言的回应","authors":"Tien-Chun Lo","doi":"10.37977/FAITHPHIL.2020.37.4.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I will defend a strategy for employing perfect being theology that Jeff Speaks calls “restriction strategy.”� In Section I, I will outline what the restriction strategy is and explicate Speaks’s objection to it. In Section II, I will propose a response to Speaks’s objection. In Section III, the response will be refined to avoid objections. My contention will be that this refined version of perfect being theology avoids Speaks’s objection, and therefore can help theists find what divine attributes God has.","PeriodicalId":45294,"journal":{"name":"Faith and Philosophy","volume":"37 1","pages":"500-515"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"F-Duplicates and Trivialization: A Reply to Speaks\",\"authors\":\"Tien-Chun Lo\",\"doi\":\"10.37977/FAITHPHIL.2020.37.4.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I will defend a strategy for employing perfect being theology that Jeff Speaks calls “restriction strategy.”� In Section I, I will outline what the restriction strategy is and explicate Speaks’s objection to it. In Section II, I will propose a response to Speaks’s objection. In Section III, the response will be refined to avoid objections. My contention will be that this refined version of perfect being theology avoids Speaks’s objection, and therefore can help theists find what divine attributes God has.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Faith and Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"500-515\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Faith and Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37977/FAITHPHIL.2020.37.4.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Faith and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37977/FAITHPHIL.2020.37.4.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇论文中，我将为一种使用完美存在神学的策略辩护，Jeff Speaks称之为“限制策略”� 在第一节中，我将概述什么是限制策略，并解释Speaks对此的反对意见。在第二节中，我们将对Speaks的反对意见提出回应。在第三节中，将对答复进行细化，以避免提出异议。我的论点是，这种完美存在神学的精炼版本避免了Speaks的反对，因此可以帮助有神论者找到上帝的神圣属性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

F-Duplicates and Trivialization: A Reply to Speaks

In this paper, I will defend a strategy for employing perfect being theology that Jeff Speaks calls “restriction strategy.”� In Section I, I will outline what the restriction strategy is and explicate Speaks’s objection to it. In Section II, I will propose a response to Speaks’s objection. In Section III, the response will be refined to avoid objections. My contention will be that this refined version of perfect being theology avoids Speaks’s objection, and therefore can help theists find what divine attributes God has.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Faith and Philosophy Multiple-

自引率

0.00%

发文量