数字通信交互式内容设计和开发的最佳实践分析

Q4 Multidisciplinary
E. Serna M., Alexei Serna A.
{"title":"数字通信交互式内容设计和开发的最佳实践分析","authors":"E. Serna M., Alexei Serna A.","doi":"10.22507/rli.v20n1a11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Several authors practice and disseminate good practices related to interactivity and agile, and from different areas and disciplines, as part of their activities, but few integrate them to develop projects. Objective. This paper presents the results of a review in which the level of dissemination of good practices related to these areas and those proposed for structuring, designing, and evaluating interactive content are investigated. Method. To conduct reliable literature reviews, it is necessary to build an initial protocol in which the research methodology is structured. Results. The final sample is made up of 100 works distributed mainly among articles, presentations at events, and online contributions. It was found that 47 % of the researchers publish about good practices to indicate an area or discipline of application, while 21 % describe them from interactivity and 24 % from agile. Conclusions. Furthermore, the good practices found are the result of personal experiences, not general validations, which makes it impossible to conclude whether they are really good.","PeriodicalId":38613,"journal":{"name":"Revista Lasallista de Investigacion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of best practices for interactive content design and development for digital communication\",\"authors\":\"E. Serna M., Alexei Serna A.\",\"doi\":\"10.22507/rli.v20n1a11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Several authors practice and disseminate good practices related to interactivity and agile, and from different areas and disciplines, as part of their activities, but few integrate them to develop projects. Objective. This paper presents the results of a review in which the level of dissemination of good practices related to these areas and those proposed for structuring, designing, and evaluating interactive content are investigated. Method. To conduct reliable literature reviews, it is necessary to build an initial protocol in which the research methodology is structured. Results. The final sample is made up of 100 works distributed mainly among articles, presentations at events, and online contributions. It was found that 47 % of the researchers publish about good practices to indicate an area or discipline of application, while 21 % describe them from interactivity and 24 % from agile. Conclusions. Furthermore, the good practices found are the result of personal experiences, not general validations, which makes it impossible to conclude whether they are really good.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Lasallista de Investigacion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Lasallista de Investigacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22507/rli.v20n1a11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Lasallista de Investigacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22507/rli.v20n1a11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。一些作者将来自不同领域和学科的与交互性和敏捷相关的良好实践作为其活动的一部分进行实践和传播,但很少有人将它们集成到开发项目中。目标。本文介绍了一项审查的结果,其中调查了与这些领域相关的良好实践的传播水平,以及那些用于构建、设计和评估交互式内容的建议。方法。为了进行可靠的文献综述,有必要建立一个初步的方案,其中研究方法是结构化的。结果。最终样本由100个作品组成,主要分布在文章、活动演示和在线投稿中。研究发现,47%的研究人员发表了关于良好实践的文章,以指出应用程序的一个领域或学科,而21%的研究人员从交互性和24%的研究人员从敏捷中描述它们。结论。此外,发现的良好实践是个人经验的结果,而不是一般验证的结果,这使得不可能断定它们是否真的很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of best practices for interactive content design and development for digital communication
Introduction. Several authors practice and disseminate good practices related to interactivity and agile, and from different areas and disciplines, as part of their activities, but few integrate them to develop projects. Objective. This paper presents the results of a review in which the level of dissemination of good practices related to these areas and those proposed for structuring, designing, and evaluating interactive content are investigated. Method. To conduct reliable literature reviews, it is necessary to build an initial protocol in which the research methodology is structured. Results. The final sample is made up of 100 works distributed mainly among articles, presentations at events, and online contributions. It was found that 47 % of the researchers publish about good practices to indicate an area or discipline of application, while 21 % describe them from interactivity and 24 % from agile. Conclusions. Furthermore, the good practices found are the result of personal experiences, not general validations, which makes it impossible to conclude whether they are really good.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Lasallista de Investigacion
Revista Lasallista de Investigacion Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: La Revista Lasallista de Investigación (ISSN: 1794 – 4449) – (ISSN (en línea): 2256 – 3938) es una revista con cobertura nacional e internacional que publica artículos en el el área de las Ciencias naturales, Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, entre otras, relativos a la investigación, desde diferentes disciplinas, siendo sometida toda publicación a verificación y cumplimiento de criterios de calidad y éticos. Es una publicación disciplinar y multidisciplinar editada por la Corporación Universitaria Lasallista, desde 2004 y está orientada a académicos, investigadores y científicos interesados en difundir su producción. Tiene versión impresa y electrónica de acceso abierto en la dirección http://repository.lasallista.edu.co:8080/ojs/index.php/rldi. Cabe anotar que los contenidos publicados en la revista son de libre acceso y no requieren ningún tipo de pago para su consulta. Para mayor Información comunicarse en la Corporación Universitaria Lasallista, PBX (057) 320 19 99 ext. 156. En la Revista se encuentran artículos en español, inglés y portugués, siendo publicados de manera eficiente artículos de investigación científica tecnológica, artículos de revisión, artículos breves, reportes de caso, cartas al editor, artículos de reflexión derivados de investigación, entre otros. La administración de los artículos se realiza en la plataforma de gestión de publicaciones (Open Journal System).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信