邪恶的妻子和贪得无厌的处女:读MS Bodley 851片段中的法典无意识

Q2 Arts and Humanities
T. C. Sawyer
{"title":"邪恶的妻子和贪得无厌的处女:读MS Bodley 851片段中的法典无意识","authors":"T. C. Sawyer","doi":"10.1353/sac.2022.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Modern scholars, imagining the reading experience infamously evoked by Jankyn's \"book of wicked wives,\" usually interpret medieval misogamous writing through a patristic and clerkly tradition dominated by Jerome. But surviving compilations rarely display the thematic unity of Jankyn's anthology or neatly reproduce familiar formulations of the Hieronymian tradition. Rather, in their juxtapositions of unlike texts, these manuscripts provide material indications of how medieval misogamy might have been conceived differently by the scribes who prepared such miscellanies and the readers who encountered them. In order to examine the cultural and imaginative assumptions that grounded material and textual compilation in mixed-content manuscripts, this essay attends to the \"codicological unconscious\" of Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Bodley 851. Specifically, it examines the obsession with feminine insatiability shared by two wholly unlike poems that survive exclusively and contiguously in a single scribal hand in the earliest material fragment of Bodley 851. Where the Ave virgo mater christi (Hail Virgin Mother of Christ) imagines insatiability as a laudable aspect of the Virgin Mary's pure erotic relationship with God, the De coniuge non ducenda (On the Necessity of Avoiding Marriage) imagines insatiability as a despicable aspect of the wife's proclivity for sexual transgression. Although this topical conjunction does not generate any overarching conceptual synthesis or competing misogamous ideology, it nevertheless illuminates how the experience of reading—recuperated via attention to singular manuscript contexts—can produce harmonies and tensions otherwise obscured.","PeriodicalId":53678,"journal":{"name":"Studies in the Age of Chaucer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wicked Wives and the Insatiable Virgin: Reading the Codicological Unconscious in a Fragment of MS Bodley 851\",\"authors\":\"T. C. Sawyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/sac.2022.0034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Modern scholars, imagining the reading experience infamously evoked by Jankyn's \\\"book of wicked wives,\\\" usually interpret medieval misogamous writing through a patristic and clerkly tradition dominated by Jerome. But surviving compilations rarely display the thematic unity of Jankyn's anthology or neatly reproduce familiar formulations of the Hieronymian tradition. Rather, in their juxtapositions of unlike texts, these manuscripts provide material indications of how medieval misogamy might have been conceived differently by the scribes who prepared such miscellanies and the readers who encountered them. In order to examine the cultural and imaginative assumptions that grounded material and textual compilation in mixed-content manuscripts, this essay attends to the \\\"codicological unconscious\\\" of Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Bodley 851. Specifically, it examines the obsession with feminine insatiability shared by two wholly unlike poems that survive exclusively and contiguously in a single scribal hand in the earliest material fragment of Bodley 851. Where the Ave virgo mater christi (Hail Virgin Mother of Christ) imagines insatiability as a laudable aspect of the Virgin Mary's pure erotic relationship with God, the De coniuge non ducenda (On the Necessity of Avoiding Marriage) imagines insatiability as a despicable aspect of the wife's proclivity for sexual transgression. Although this topical conjunction does not generate any overarching conceptual synthesis or competing misogamous ideology, it nevertheless illuminates how the experience of reading—recuperated via attention to singular manuscript contexts—can produce harmonies and tensions otherwise obscured.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in the Age of Chaucer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in the Age of Chaucer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/sac.2022.0034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in the Age of Chaucer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sac.2022.0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:现代学者在想象扬金的《恶妻书》所引发的臭名昭著的阅读体验时,通常通过以杰罗姆为主导的教父和书记员传统来解读中世纪的厌妻写作。但幸存下来的汇编很少显示出扬金选集的主题统一性,也很少整齐地再现Hieronymian传统的熟悉公式。相反,在不同文本的并列中,这些手稿提供了实质性的迹象,表明编写这些杂记的抄写员和遇到这些杂记的读者可能对中世纪的厌妻制有不同的看法。为了研究混合内容手稿中基于材料和文本编辑的文化和想象假设,本文关注牛津大学的“法典无意识”,博德利图书馆,MS博德利851。具体地说,它考察了两首完全不同的诗对女性贪得无厌的痴迷,这两首诗在Bodley 851最早的材料片段中仅存并连续地保存在一个抄写者手中。《圣母玛利亚》(Ave virgo mater christi)将贪得无厌想象成圣母玛利亚与上帝纯洁的情爱关系中值得称赞的一面,而《论避免婚姻的必要性》(De coniuge non ducenda)则将贪得无厌想象成妻子性侵犯倾向的可鄙一面。虽然这个主题的结合并没有产生任何总体的概念综合或竞争的厌恶配偶的意识形态,但它仍然阐明了阅读的经验-通过对单一手稿上下文的关注来恢复-可以产生和谐和紧张,否则会被掩盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wicked Wives and the Insatiable Virgin: Reading the Codicological Unconscious in a Fragment of MS Bodley 851
Abstract:Modern scholars, imagining the reading experience infamously evoked by Jankyn's "book of wicked wives," usually interpret medieval misogamous writing through a patristic and clerkly tradition dominated by Jerome. But surviving compilations rarely display the thematic unity of Jankyn's anthology or neatly reproduce familiar formulations of the Hieronymian tradition. Rather, in their juxtapositions of unlike texts, these manuscripts provide material indications of how medieval misogamy might have been conceived differently by the scribes who prepared such miscellanies and the readers who encountered them. In order to examine the cultural and imaginative assumptions that grounded material and textual compilation in mixed-content manuscripts, this essay attends to the "codicological unconscious" of Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Bodley 851. Specifically, it examines the obsession with feminine insatiability shared by two wholly unlike poems that survive exclusively and contiguously in a single scribal hand in the earliest material fragment of Bodley 851. Where the Ave virgo mater christi (Hail Virgin Mother of Christ) imagines insatiability as a laudable aspect of the Virgin Mary's pure erotic relationship with God, the De coniuge non ducenda (On the Necessity of Avoiding Marriage) imagines insatiability as a despicable aspect of the wife's proclivity for sexual transgression. Although this topical conjunction does not generate any overarching conceptual synthesis or competing misogamous ideology, it nevertheless illuminates how the experience of reading—recuperated via attention to singular manuscript contexts—can produce harmonies and tensions otherwise obscured.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in the Age of Chaucer
Studies in the Age of Chaucer Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信