商业、就业和政治:中美贸易对美国国内政治的影响

James A. Caporaso
{"title":"商业、就业和政治:中美贸易对美国国内政治的影响","authors":"James A. Caporaso","doi":"10.1108/itpd-10-2021-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of the paper “Commerce, jobs and politics: the impact of the USA–China trade on USA domestic politics” is to examine the impact of Chinese trade with the USA to determine the consequences of the trade on manufacturing employment. The geographic and sectoral impacts of this trade are assessed. The conclusion is that the USA–China trade has affected political polarization in such a way as to affect electoral outcomes. Implications for policy are discussed in the paper.Design/methodology/approachThe overall design is a focused case study in terms of its focus on the USA–China trade relations. There is also a statistical component due to the breakdown of the USA in economic commuting zones.FindingsThe major finding is that Chinese import penetration created substantial political polarization in the USA and that polarization affected electoral outcomes. Chinese import penetration also resulted in a shift of jobs from the eastern heartland to the coasts. Much of the transition was aided by the restructuring of jobs within firms from manufacturing to high-end services.Research limitations/implicationsPerhaps, the biggest limitation concerns how general and durable the findings are. The authors establish that the first decade after Chinese entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) (2001) was characterized by economic disruption in the USA labor market. Whether the economic effects will have a longer duration is not known.Practical implicationsOne practical limitation is that it is difficult to know what policy actions to take on the basis of the research: trade policy, human capital (education) policy or place-based policies which aid particular regions.Social implicationsThe social implications in this paper are jobs and employment policy.Originality/valueThe author thinks this is very original work, though based on the work of several economists. But outside of a few articles, the author does not think much has appeared in political science journals.","PeriodicalId":34605,"journal":{"name":"International Trade Politics and Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commerce, jobs and politics: the impact of the USA–China trade on USA domestic politics\",\"authors\":\"James A. Caporaso\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/itpd-10-2021-0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe purpose of the paper “Commerce, jobs and politics: the impact of the USA–China trade on USA domestic politics” is to examine the impact of Chinese trade with the USA to determine the consequences of the trade on manufacturing employment. The geographic and sectoral impacts of this trade are assessed. The conclusion is that the USA–China trade has affected political polarization in such a way as to affect electoral outcomes. Implications for policy are discussed in the paper.Design/methodology/approachThe overall design is a focused case study in terms of its focus on the USA–China trade relations. There is also a statistical component due to the breakdown of the USA in economic commuting zones.FindingsThe major finding is that Chinese import penetration created substantial political polarization in the USA and that polarization affected electoral outcomes. Chinese import penetration also resulted in a shift of jobs from the eastern heartland to the coasts. Much of the transition was aided by the restructuring of jobs within firms from manufacturing to high-end services.Research limitations/implicationsPerhaps, the biggest limitation concerns how general and durable the findings are. The authors establish that the first decade after Chinese entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) (2001) was characterized by economic disruption in the USA labor market. Whether the economic effects will have a longer duration is not known.Practical implicationsOne practical limitation is that it is difficult to know what policy actions to take on the basis of the research: trade policy, human capital (education) policy or place-based policies which aid particular regions.Social implicationsThe social implications in this paper are jobs and employment policy.Originality/valueThe author thinks this is very original work, though based on the work of several economists. But outside of a few articles, the author does not think much has appeared in political science journals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Trade Politics and Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Trade Politics and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/itpd-10-2021-0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Trade Politics and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/itpd-10-2021-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的《商业、就业与政治:美中贸易对美国国内政治的影响》一文的目的是考察中国对美国贸易的影响,以确定贸易对制造业就业的影响。对这种贸易的地理和部门影响进行了评估。结论是,美中贸易影响了政治两极分化,从而影响了选举结果。本文讨论了对政策的影响。设计/方法论/方法总体设计是一个重点案例研究,重点关注美中贸易关系。由于美国在经济通勤区的细分,还有一个统计成分。主要发现是,中国的进口渗透在美国造成了严重的政治两极分化,这种两极分化影响了选举结果。中国的进口渗透也导致工作岗位从东部腹地转移到沿海地区。这一转变在很大程度上得益于企业内部工作岗位从制造业向高端服务业的重组。研究的局限性/含义也许,最大的局限性在于研究结果的普遍性和持久性。作者认为,中国加入世界贸易组织(WTO)后的第一个十年(2001年)的特点是美国劳动力市场的经济混乱。经济影响是否会持续更长时间尚不清楚。实际含义一个实际限制是,很难知道在研究的基础上采取什么政策行动:贸易政策、人力资本(教育)政策或援助特定地区的地方政策。社会含义本文中的社会含义是就业和就业政策。独创性/价值作者认为这是一部非常新颖的作品,尽管是基于几位经济学家的作品。但除了几篇文章外,作者认为在政治学期刊上出现的文章并不多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Commerce, jobs and politics: the impact of the USA–China trade on USA domestic politics
PurposeThe purpose of the paper “Commerce, jobs and politics: the impact of the USA–China trade on USA domestic politics” is to examine the impact of Chinese trade with the USA to determine the consequences of the trade on manufacturing employment. The geographic and sectoral impacts of this trade are assessed. The conclusion is that the USA–China trade has affected political polarization in such a way as to affect electoral outcomes. Implications for policy are discussed in the paper.Design/methodology/approachThe overall design is a focused case study in terms of its focus on the USA–China trade relations. There is also a statistical component due to the breakdown of the USA in economic commuting zones.FindingsThe major finding is that Chinese import penetration created substantial political polarization in the USA and that polarization affected electoral outcomes. Chinese import penetration also resulted in a shift of jobs from the eastern heartland to the coasts. Much of the transition was aided by the restructuring of jobs within firms from manufacturing to high-end services.Research limitations/implicationsPerhaps, the biggest limitation concerns how general and durable the findings are. The authors establish that the first decade after Chinese entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) (2001) was characterized by economic disruption in the USA labor market. Whether the economic effects will have a longer duration is not known.Practical implicationsOne practical limitation is that it is difficult to know what policy actions to take on the basis of the research: trade policy, human capital (education) policy or place-based policies which aid particular regions.Social implicationsThe social implications in this paper are jobs and employment policy.Originality/valueThe author thinks this is very original work, though based on the work of several economists. But outside of a few articles, the author does not think much has appeared in political science journals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信