社会脆弱性背景下的用户研究、信息中介和信息素养:可能的对话

Q3 Social Sciences
G. Righetto, Tânia Regina De Brito, Elizete Vieira Vitorino
{"title":"社会脆弱性背景下的用户研究、信息中介和信息素养:可能的对话","authors":"G. Righetto, Tânia Regina De Brito, Elizete Vieira Vitorino","doi":"10.17533/udea.rib.v45n3e344054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article seeks to trace the convergences between the sub-areas/disciplines of user studies, mediation of information and information literacy aimed at the contexts of social vulnerability, seeking to present more holistic views that contribute to the discussions of the area and for the development of social, digital and cultural protagonism of unfortunate groups. In this sense, the methodological procedures were established through the ends as a qualitative, exploratory and descriptive research, seeking to discuss the theoretical-conceptual assumptions and the possible dialogues among the themes brought. Also, the study is classified as bibliographic, since it used reading, analysis and interpretation of concepts and theories about the themes brought up, seeking to present such assumptions and dialogues around the bias of the social perspective of Information Science. As a result of the discussion, it is understood that user studies, mediation of information and information literacy can be considered interference actions, as they are concerned with the understanding and training of critical and reflective citizens in the face of socio-informational realities. The set of these actions consolidates an investigative posture of both the one who teaches as well the apprentice, as it allows empowerment and emancipation in the tangle of available information.","PeriodicalId":37195,"journal":{"name":"Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User Studies, Mediation of Information and Information Literacy in the Contexts of Social Vulnerability: Possible Dialogues\",\"authors\":\"G. Righetto, Tânia Regina De Brito, Elizete Vieira Vitorino\",\"doi\":\"10.17533/udea.rib.v45n3e344054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article seeks to trace the convergences between the sub-areas/disciplines of user studies, mediation of information and information literacy aimed at the contexts of social vulnerability, seeking to present more holistic views that contribute to the discussions of the area and for the development of social, digital and cultural protagonism of unfortunate groups. In this sense, the methodological procedures were established through the ends as a qualitative, exploratory and descriptive research, seeking to discuss the theoretical-conceptual assumptions and the possible dialogues among the themes brought. Also, the study is classified as bibliographic, since it used reading, analysis and interpretation of concepts and theories about the themes brought up, seeking to present such assumptions and dialogues around the bias of the social perspective of Information Science. As a result of the discussion, it is understood that user studies, mediation of information and information literacy can be considered interference actions, as they are concerned with the understanding and training of critical and reflective citizens in the face of socio-informational realities. The set of these actions consolidates an investigative posture of both the one who teaches as well the apprentice, as it allows empowerment and emancipation in the tangle of available information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecologia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v45n3e344054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v45n3e344054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图追踪用户研究的子领域/学科之间的融合,针对社会脆弱性背景的信息调解和信息素养,试图提出更全面的观点,有助于该领域的讨论,以及不幸群体的社会、数字和文化主角的发展。从这个意义上说,方法程序自始至终都是定性的、探索性的和描述性的研究,力求讨论理论-概念上的假设和所带来的主题之间可能的对话。此外,该研究被归类为书目,因为它使用阅读,分析和解释有关所提出主题的概念和理论,试图围绕信息科学社会视角的偏见提出这些假设和对话。讨论的结果是,人们了解到用户研究、信息调解和信息素养可被视为干预行动,因为它们涉及到面对社会信息现实的批判和反思公民的理解和培训。这些动作集合巩固了教者和学徒的调查姿态,因为它允许在可用信息的混乱中赋予权力和解放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
User Studies, Mediation of Information and Information Literacy in the Contexts of Social Vulnerability: Possible Dialogues
This article seeks to trace the convergences between the sub-areas/disciplines of user studies, mediation of information and information literacy aimed at the contexts of social vulnerability, seeking to present more holistic views that contribute to the discussions of the area and for the development of social, digital and cultural protagonism of unfortunate groups. In this sense, the methodological procedures were established through the ends as a qualitative, exploratory and descriptive research, seeking to discuss the theoretical-conceptual assumptions and the possible dialogues among the themes brought. Also, the study is classified as bibliographic, since it used reading, analysis and interpretation of concepts and theories about the themes brought up, seeking to present such assumptions and dialogues around the bias of the social perspective of Information Science. As a result of the discussion, it is understood that user studies, mediation of information and information literacy can be considered interference actions, as they are concerned with the understanding and training of critical and reflective citizens in the face of socio-informational realities. The set of these actions consolidates an investigative posture of both the one who teaches as well the apprentice, as it allows empowerment and emancipation in the tangle of available information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecologia
Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecologia Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信