应用预防性α阻断剂减少腹股沟疝修补术后尿潴留:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Gavin G. Calpin , Alice M. O'Neill , Matthew G. Davey , Peggy Miller , William P. Joyce
{"title":"应用预防性α阻断剂减少腹股沟疝修补术后尿潴留:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析","authors":"Gavin G. Calpin ,&nbsp;Alice M. O'Neill ,&nbsp;Matthew G. Davey ,&nbsp;Peggy Miller ,&nbsp;William P. Joyce","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The incidence of post-operative urinary retention (POUR) following inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is approximately 0.4% - 22.0%. POUR may lead to patient discomfort and catheter-related complications including urinary tract infection, urethral trauma, bladder overdistension and subsequent permanent bladder dysfunction. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials (RCT) evaluating the impact of administration of perioperative alpha-blockade to reduce the incidence of acute POUR following IHR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA guidelines. The incidence of POUR in the alpha-blocker and control groups were expressed as dichotomous outcomes, reported as odds ratios (ORs) expressed with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) following estimation using the Mantel-Haenszel method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eight RCTs with a combined total of 918 patients were included. Of these, 53.7% (493/918) received alpha-blockers while 46.3% (425/918) did not. Five studies used tamsulosin, two used prazosin and one used phenoxybenzamine. Overall, the prescription of prophylactic alpha-blockers in the preoperative setting significantly reduced POUR compared to the control group (7.9% (39/493) vs 21.2% (90/425), OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.12–0.80, <em>P</em> = 0.020).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Preoperative prescription of alpha-blockers reduced the incidence of POUR following inguinal hernia repair. The next generation of prospective randomised trials may identify which patients should be prescribed this medication prior to surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Administering prophylactic alpha-blockade to reduce urinary retention post inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials\",\"authors\":\"Gavin G. Calpin ,&nbsp;Alice M. O'Neill ,&nbsp;Matthew G. Davey ,&nbsp;Peggy Miller ,&nbsp;William P. Joyce\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The incidence of post-operative urinary retention (POUR) following inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is approximately 0.4% - 22.0%. POUR may lead to patient discomfort and catheter-related complications including urinary tract infection, urethral trauma, bladder overdistension and subsequent permanent bladder dysfunction. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials (RCT) evaluating the impact of administration of perioperative alpha-blockade to reduce the incidence of acute POUR following IHR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA guidelines. The incidence of POUR in the alpha-blocker and control groups were expressed as dichotomous outcomes, reported as odds ratios (ORs) expressed with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) following estimation using the Mantel-Haenszel method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eight RCTs with a combined total of 918 patients were included. Of these, 53.7% (493/918) received alpha-blockers while 46.3% (425/918) did not. Five studies used tamsulosin, two used prazosin and one used phenoxybenzamine. Overall, the prescription of prophylactic alpha-blockers in the preoperative setting significantly reduced POUR compared to the control group (7.9% (39/493) vs 21.2% (90/425), OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.12–0.80, <em>P</em> = 0.020).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Preoperative prescription of alpha-blockers reduced the incidence of POUR following inguinal hernia repair. The next generation of prospective randomised trials may identify which patients should be prescribed this medication prior to surgery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery in practice and science\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery in practice and science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000505\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

腹股沟疝修补术(IHR)术后尿潴留(POUR)的发生率约为0.4% ~ 22.0%。POUR可能导致患者不适和导尿管相关并发症,包括尿路感染、尿道创伤、膀胱过度膨胀和随后的永久性膀胱功能障碍。我们的目的是对随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估围手术期给予α -阻断剂对减少IHR后急性POUR发生率的影响。方法按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价。α受体阻滞剂组和对照组的POUR发生率以二分类结果表示,在使用Mantel-Haenszel方法估计后,以95%置信区间(ci)表示的比值比(ORs)报告。结果纳入8项随机对照试验,共918例患者。其中,53.7%(493/918)接受了α -受体阻滞剂治疗,46.3%(425/918)未接受。五项研究使用坦索罗辛,两项使用哌唑嗪,一项使用苯氧苄胺。总体而言,与对照组相比,术前预防性α -受体阻滞剂处方显著降低了POUR (7.9% (39/493) vs 21.2% (90/425), OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.12-0.80, P = 0.020)。结论术前处方α受体阻滞剂可降低腹股沟疝修补术后POUR的发生率。下一代前瞻性随机试验可能会确定哪些患者在手术前应该开这种药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Administering prophylactic alpha-blockade to reduce urinary retention post inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials

Introduction

The incidence of post-operative urinary retention (POUR) following inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is approximately 0.4% - 22.0%. POUR may lead to patient discomfort and catheter-related complications including urinary tract infection, urethral trauma, bladder overdistension and subsequent permanent bladder dysfunction. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials (RCT) evaluating the impact of administration of perioperative alpha-blockade to reduce the incidence of acute POUR following IHR.

Methods

A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA guidelines. The incidence of POUR in the alpha-blocker and control groups were expressed as dichotomous outcomes, reported as odds ratios (ORs) expressed with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) following estimation using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

Results

Eight RCTs with a combined total of 918 patients were included. Of these, 53.7% (493/918) received alpha-blockers while 46.3% (425/918) did not. Five studies used tamsulosin, two used prazosin and one used phenoxybenzamine. Overall, the prescription of prophylactic alpha-blockers in the preoperative setting significantly reduced POUR compared to the control group (7.9% (39/493) vs 21.2% (90/425), OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.12–0.80, P = 0.020).

Conclusion

Preoperative prescription of alpha-blockers reduced the incidence of POUR following inguinal hernia repair. The next generation of prospective randomised trials may identify which patients should be prescribed this medication prior to surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信