教育中的“包容”和“民主”:职业治疗师的概念和思想探索

IF 1.6 Q2 Health Professions
Joana Rostirolla Batista de Souza, P. L. D. O. Borba, L. C. Pan, R. Lopes
{"title":"教育中的“包容”和“民主”:职业治疗师的概念和思想探索","authors":"Joana Rostirolla Batista de Souza, P. L. D. O. Borba, L. C. Pan, R. Lopes","doi":"10.1080/14473828.2021.1921929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Assuming the Brazilian context, emphasis is placed on occupational therapists’ reflections to contribute to an international dialogue on concepts that support practices in schools/the educational sector that are still little explored. Initially, the World Federation of Occupational Therapists’ position, which adheres to a certain perspective of ‘Inclusion’, applied to schooling processes is challenged. We aim to foster theoretical development about the concept of ‘Inclusion’ in education, in dialogue with occupational therapy and its proposals for this area. The defence of a democratic school by occupational therapists is advocated considering its limitations and possibilities in a society founded on inequality. The question remains as to which new concepts will underpin our practices or whether we can/should assume the task of rewriting/reframing them in search of what motivates us: concern to ensure, in daily professional practice, the access, permanence and, mainly, participation of those who are outside school.","PeriodicalId":53208,"journal":{"name":"World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin","volume":"77 1","pages":"107 - 113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14473828.2021.1921929","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Inclusion’ and ‘Democracy’ in Education: An exploration of concepts and ideas for occupational therapists\",\"authors\":\"Joana Rostirolla Batista de Souza, P. L. D. O. Borba, L. C. Pan, R. Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14473828.2021.1921929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Assuming the Brazilian context, emphasis is placed on occupational therapists’ reflections to contribute to an international dialogue on concepts that support practices in schools/the educational sector that are still little explored. Initially, the World Federation of Occupational Therapists’ position, which adheres to a certain perspective of ‘Inclusion’, applied to schooling processes is challenged. We aim to foster theoretical development about the concept of ‘Inclusion’ in education, in dialogue with occupational therapy and its proposals for this area. The defence of a democratic school by occupational therapists is advocated considering its limitations and possibilities in a society founded on inequality. The question remains as to which new concepts will underpin our practices or whether we can/should assume the task of rewriting/reframing them in search of what motivates us: concern to ensure, in daily professional practice, the access, permanence and, mainly, participation of those who are outside school.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"107 - 113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14473828.2021.1921929\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14473828.2021.1921929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14473828.2021.1921929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要假设在巴西的背景下,重点是职业治疗师的反思,以促进关于支持学校/教育部门实践的概念的国际对话,而这些概念仍然很少被探索。最初,世界职业治疗师联合会坚持“包容”的特定观点,将其应用于学校教育过程,这一立场受到了挑战。我们的目标是促进教育中“包容”概念的理论发展,与职业治疗及其在这一领域的建议进行对话。考虑到民主学校在一个建立在不平等基础上的社会中的局限性和可能性,职业治疗师主张为民主学校辩护。问题仍然是,哪些新概念将支撑我们的实践,或者我们是否可以/应该承担改写/重新构建这些概念的任务,以寻找激励我们的因素:在日常职业实践中,关注确保校外人员的机会、永久性,主要是参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Inclusion’ and ‘Democracy’ in Education: An exploration of concepts and ideas for occupational therapists
ABSTRACT Assuming the Brazilian context, emphasis is placed on occupational therapists’ reflections to contribute to an international dialogue on concepts that support practices in schools/the educational sector that are still little explored. Initially, the World Federation of Occupational Therapists’ position, which adheres to a certain perspective of ‘Inclusion’, applied to schooling processes is challenged. We aim to foster theoretical development about the concept of ‘Inclusion’ in education, in dialogue with occupational therapy and its proposals for this area. The defence of a democratic school by occupational therapists is advocated considering its limitations and possibilities in a society founded on inequality. The question remains as to which new concepts will underpin our practices or whether we can/should assume the task of rewriting/reframing them in search of what motivates us: concern to ensure, in daily professional practice, the access, permanence and, mainly, participation of those who are outside school.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信