作为预防性司法场所的欧盟外部边界

IF 1.4 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

European Law Journal Pub Date : 2022-10-19 DOI:10.1111/eulj.12444

Valsamis Mitsilegas

{"title":"作为预防性司法场所的欧盟外部边界","authors":"Valsamis Mitsilegas","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to fill a gap in the literature on the externalisation of immigration control by focusing not on practices of extraterritorial immigration control but on the externalisation of immigration control at the EU external border. The article will examine four parallel and inter-related trends of preventive injustice on the border: the denial of law and pushbacks, and their handling by judicial authorities and EU institutions and agencies; the emerging framework of the instrumentalisation of migration; the normalisation of border procedures based on the fiction of ‘non-entry’; and detention of third-country nationals at the border, to back up non-entry policies. The article will highlight the rule of law deficit such externalisation entails.","PeriodicalId":47166,"journal":{"name":"European Law Journal","volume":"28 4-6","pages":"263-280"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eulj.12444","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The EU external border as a site of preventive (in)justice\",\"authors\":\"Valsamis Mitsilegas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eulj.12444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the article is to fill a gap in the literature on the externalisation of immigration control by focusing not on practices of extraterritorial immigration control but on the externalisation of immigration control at the EU external border. The article will examine four parallel and inter-related trends of preventive injustice on the border: the denial of law and pushbacks, and their handling by judicial authorities and EU institutions and agencies; the emerging framework of the instrumentalisation of migration; the normalisation of border procedures based on the fiction of ‘non-entry’; and detention of third-country nationals at the border, to back up non-entry policies. The article will highlight the rule of law deficit such externalisation entails.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"28 4-6\",\"pages\":\"263-280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eulj.12444\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eulj.12444\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eulj.12444","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是填补关于移民控制外部化的文献空白，不关注域外移民控制的实践，而是关注欧盟外部边界的移民控制外部化。本文将研究边境上预防性不公正的四个平行和相互关联的趋势:拒绝法律和反击，以及司法当局和欧盟机构和机构对它们的处理;移民工具化的新框架;基于“不入境”假设的边境程序正常化;并在边境拘留第三国公民，以支持不入境政策。本文将强调这种外部化所带来的法治缺陷。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The EU external border as a site of preventive (in)justice

The aim of the article is to fill a gap in the literature on the externalisation of immigration control by focusing not on practices of extraterritorial immigration control but on the externalisation of immigration control at the EU external border. The article will examine four parallel and inter-related trends of preventive injustice on the border: the denial of law and pushbacks, and their handling by judicial authorities and EU institutions and agencies; the emerging framework of the instrumentalisation of migration; the normalisation of border procedures based on the fiction of ‘non-entry’; and detention of third-country nationals at the border, to back up non-entry policies. The article will highlight the rule of law deficit such externalisation entails.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

European Law Journal LAW-

CiteScore

2.10

自引率

21.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Law Journal represents an authoritative new approach to the study of European Law, developed specifically to express and develop the study and understanding of European law in its social, cultural, political and economic context. It has a highly reputed board of editors. The journal fills a major gap in the current literature on all issues of European law, and is essential reading for anyone studying or practising EU law and its diverse impact on the environment, national legal systems, local government, economic organizations, and European citizens. As well as focusing on the European Union, the journal also examines the national legal systems of countries in Western, Central and Eastern Europe and relations between Europe and other parts of the world, particularly the United States, Japan, China, India, Mercosur and developing countries. The journal is published in English but is dedicated to publishing native language articles and has a dedicated translation fund available for this purpose. It is a refereed journal.