荒野中的诱惑:彼得·阿克罗伊德《米尔顿在美国》中的自由与暴政

IF 0.1 2区 文学 0 POETRY
G. Semenza
{"title":"荒野中的诱惑:彼得·阿克罗伊德《米尔顿在美国》中的自由与暴政","authors":"G. Semenza","doi":"10.1353/MLT.2017.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gordon Campbell and Thomas Corns are merely two of the most recent defenders of the idea that “in intellectual terms, Milton is one of the founding fathers of America.”1 Here they are speaking — like George Sensabaugh, Lydia Dittler Schulman, and R. P. Van Anglen before them — of Milton’s obvious influence on the republicanism of such figures as Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and John Adams.2 The adjective “intellectual” in their introductory prepositional phrase is crucial, however, for it registers simultaneously the authors’ agreement with what has become a commonplace in writings on John Milton and America, and qualifies the broader implications of the main clause. Campbell and Corns go on, after all, to assert that Milton is not our contemporary: “He was certainly no democrat,” they remind us, nor","PeriodicalId":42710,"journal":{"name":"Milton Studies","volume":"58 1","pages":"27 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/MLT.2017.0002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temptations in the Wilderness: Freedom and Tyranny in Peter Ackroyd's Milton in America\",\"authors\":\"G. Semenza\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/MLT.2017.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gordon Campbell and Thomas Corns are merely two of the most recent defenders of the idea that “in intellectual terms, Milton is one of the founding fathers of America.”1 Here they are speaking — like George Sensabaugh, Lydia Dittler Schulman, and R. P. Van Anglen before them — of Milton’s obvious influence on the republicanism of such figures as Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and John Adams.2 The adjective “intellectual” in their introductory prepositional phrase is crucial, however, for it registers simultaneously the authors’ agreement with what has become a commonplace in writings on John Milton and America, and qualifies the broader implications of the main clause. Campbell and Corns go on, after all, to assert that Milton is not our contemporary: “He was certainly no democrat,” they remind us, nor\",\"PeriodicalId\":42710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Milton Studies\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"27 - 45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/MLT.2017.0002\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Milton Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/MLT.2017.0002\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milton Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/MLT.2017.0002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

戈登·坎贝尔和托马斯·科恩斯只是最近两位为“在智力方面,弥尔顿是美国的开国元勋之一”这一观点辩护的人。他们在这里说话——就像他们之前的乔治·森萨堡、莉迪亚·迪特勒·舒尔曼和r·p·范安格伦一样然而,在他们的介绍性介词短语中,形容词“知识分子”是至关重要的,因为它同时表明了作者对约翰·弥尔顿和美国的著作中已成为老生常谈的观点的同意,并限定了主句的更广泛的含义。毕竟,坎贝尔和科恩斯继续断言弥尔顿不是我们同时代的人:“他当然不是民主主义者,”他们提醒我们,也不是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temptations in the Wilderness: Freedom and Tyranny in Peter Ackroyd's Milton in America
Gordon Campbell and Thomas Corns are merely two of the most recent defenders of the idea that “in intellectual terms, Milton is one of the founding fathers of America.”1 Here they are speaking — like George Sensabaugh, Lydia Dittler Schulman, and R. P. Van Anglen before them — of Milton’s obvious influence on the republicanism of such figures as Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and John Adams.2 The adjective “intellectual” in their introductory prepositional phrase is crucial, however, for it registers simultaneously the authors’ agreement with what has become a commonplace in writings on John Milton and America, and qualifies the broader implications of the main clause. Campbell and Corns go on, after all, to assert that Milton is not our contemporary: “He was certainly no democrat,” they remind us, nor
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Milton Studies
Milton Studies POETRY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Milton Studies is published annually by the University of Pittsburgh Press as a forum for Milton scholarship and criticism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信