{"title":"展望与陷阱:混合遗址行动研究述评","authors":"Bradley D. Phillippi, Eiryn Sheades","doi":"10.1080/21619441.2019.1644829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The variants of community-based research projects in archaeology have increased exponentially in number since the 1980s, and the once-well-defined lines dividing “academic” and “public” archaeology continue to fade. We welcome the protracted and necessary change, but community-based research lacks the rigidity of previous paradigmatic approaches in archaeological research. For good reason. Here we provide a commentary based on our collaborative projects with two communities of mixed-descent on Long Island to emphasize how action research defies well-defined approaches. If anything, our experiences showcase some of the challenges community archaeologies encounter yet are reluctant to acknowledge. We focus on race and heritage, their intersection, and the dynamic experiences they impose and create. We offer very little in the way of solutions to the challenges we present, but hope to illustrate how self-reflection and flexibility are requisites of effective collaborative research, particularly with communities of mixed-ancestry.","PeriodicalId":37778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage","volume":"8 1","pages":"147 - 162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21619441.2019.1644829","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospects and Pitfalls: Comments on Action Research at Sites of Mixed Heritage\",\"authors\":\"Bradley D. Phillippi, Eiryn Sheades\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21619441.2019.1644829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The variants of community-based research projects in archaeology have increased exponentially in number since the 1980s, and the once-well-defined lines dividing “academic” and “public” archaeology continue to fade. We welcome the protracted and necessary change, but community-based research lacks the rigidity of previous paradigmatic approaches in archaeological research. For good reason. Here we provide a commentary based on our collaborative projects with two communities of mixed-descent on Long Island to emphasize how action research defies well-defined approaches. If anything, our experiences showcase some of the challenges community archaeologies encounter yet are reluctant to acknowledge. We focus on race and heritage, their intersection, and the dynamic experiences they impose and create. We offer very little in the way of solutions to the challenges we present, but hope to illustrate how self-reflection and flexibility are requisites of effective collaborative research, particularly with communities of mixed-ancestry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"147 - 162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21619441.2019.1644829\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21619441.2019.1644829\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21619441.2019.1644829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prospects and Pitfalls: Comments on Action Research at Sites of Mixed Heritage
ABSTRACT The variants of community-based research projects in archaeology have increased exponentially in number since the 1980s, and the once-well-defined lines dividing “academic” and “public” archaeology continue to fade. We welcome the protracted and necessary change, but community-based research lacks the rigidity of previous paradigmatic approaches in archaeological research. For good reason. Here we provide a commentary based on our collaborative projects with two communities of mixed-descent on Long Island to emphasize how action research defies well-defined approaches. If anything, our experiences showcase some of the challenges community archaeologies encounter yet are reluctant to acknowledge. We focus on race and heritage, their intersection, and the dynamic experiences they impose and create. We offer very little in the way of solutions to the challenges we present, but hope to illustrate how self-reflection and flexibility are requisites of effective collaborative research, particularly with communities of mixed-ancestry.
期刊介绍:
Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage provides a focal point for peer-reviewed publications in interdisciplinary studies in archaeology, history, material culture, and heritage dynamics concerning African descendant populations and cultures across the globe. The Journal invites articles on broad topics, including the historical processes of culture, economics, gender, power, and racialization operating within and upon African descendant communities. We seek to engage scholarly, professional, and community perspectives on the social dynamics and historical legacies of African descendant cultures and communities worldwide. The Journal publishes research articles and essays that review developments in these interdisciplinary fields.