白话英语:阅读后殖民印度的英语国家

IF 0.9 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Shwetha Chandrashekhar
{"title":"白话英语:阅读后殖民印度的英语国家","authors":"Shwetha Chandrashekhar","doi":"10.1080/19472498.2023.2164986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"their own respective contexts, the extent to which each concentrated on or privileged violence over their brethren in the pursuit of sovereignty is surely up for debate. Fratricide may well have been a means to the end of sovereignty during the violence which followed partition in 1947, but the relevance of fratricide specifically, as opposed to mere enmity and anti-imperial resentment, to discourses of sovereignty in the decades which came before could perhaps be developed further. Furthermore, there remains a jarring absence in the book of South Indian contribution to the ‘Indian Age’ that lies at the bedrock of Kapila’s thesis. While a small piece on Tamil revolutionary VVS Aiyar features in the second chapter, the focus on actors and regions attached to the northern expanses of the subcontinent does seem to somewhat weaken the general geographical applicability of what is otherwise a novel, hard-hitting thesis. Drawing inspiration from recent histories of the British Empire and from a wide variety of source material, Kapila’s wide-ranging exploration nonetheless makes for a gripping historical account of Indian intellectual thought during the later colonial period. Presenting and comparing the ideas of political figures from Tilak to Ambedkar to Patel, Kapila highlights the need to journey beyond the discourses of liberalism, socialism, and Marxism to understand how Indian political thought came to be preoccupied by questions of fraternity, violence, and sovereignty. Turning these political actors of the age into political thinkers, Kapila demonstrates how the protagonists of her work moved in and engaged with both Indian and global political circles and so calls attention to the intricacies of political thought within a subcontinental context. Background knowledge of the developments in India’s transition to independence is a prerequisite for those who seek to engage with Kapila’s argument. Nevertheless, Kapila’s book will be of interest to scholars interested in exploring alternatives to traditional accounts of modern Indian history.","PeriodicalId":43902,"journal":{"name":"South Asian History and Culture","volume":"14 1","pages":"373 - 375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vernacular English: reading the anglophone in postcolonial India\",\"authors\":\"Shwetha Chandrashekhar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19472498.2023.2164986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"their own respective contexts, the extent to which each concentrated on or privileged violence over their brethren in the pursuit of sovereignty is surely up for debate. Fratricide may well have been a means to the end of sovereignty during the violence which followed partition in 1947, but the relevance of fratricide specifically, as opposed to mere enmity and anti-imperial resentment, to discourses of sovereignty in the decades which came before could perhaps be developed further. Furthermore, there remains a jarring absence in the book of South Indian contribution to the ‘Indian Age’ that lies at the bedrock of Kapila’s thesis. While a small piece on Tamil revolutionary VVS Aiyar features in the second chapter, the focus on actors and regions attached to the northern expanses of the subcontinent does seem to somewhat weaken the general geographical applicability of what is otherwise a novel, hard-hitting thesis. Drawing inspiration from recent histories of the British Empire and from a wide variety of source material, Kapila’s wide-ranging exploration nonetheless makes for a gripping historical account of Indian intellectual thought during the later colonial period. Presenting and comparing the ideas of political figures from Tilak to Ambedkar to Patel, Kapila highlights the need to journey beyond the discourses of liberalism, socialism, and Marxism to understand how Indian political thought came to be preoccupied by questions of fraternity, violence, and sovereignty. Turning these political actors of the age into political thinkers, Kapila demonstrates how the protagonists of her work moved in and engaged with both Indian and global political circles and so calls attention to the intricacies of political thought within a subcontinental context. Background knowledge of the developments in India’s transition to independence is a prerequisite for those who seek to engage with Kapila’s argument. Nevertheless, Kapila’s book will be of interest to scholars interested in exploring alternatives to traditional accounts of modern Indian history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South Asian History and Culture\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"373 - 375\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South Asian History and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19472498.2023.2164986\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian History and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19472498.2023.2164986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在他们各自的背景下,在追求主权的过程中,每个人在多大程度上集中于或优先于他们的兄弟使用暴力,这无疑是值得讨论的。在1947年分治后的暴力冲突中,自相残杀很可能是结束主权的一种手段,但相对于单纯的敌意和反帝国主义的怨恨,自相残杀与之前几十年的主权话语的相关性可能会进一步发展。此外,在书中仍然有一个不和谐的缺失,南印度对“印度时代”的贡献,这是卡皮拉论文的基石。虽然在第二章中有一小部分是关于泰米尔革命者VVS Aiyar的,但对演员和附属于次大陆北部地区的地区的关注,似乎在某种程度上削弱了这个新颖而有力的论点的一般地理适用性。卡皮拉从大英帝国近代史和各种各样的原始材料中汲取灵感,对殖民后期印度知识分子思想进行了广泛的探索,这是一部扣人心弦的历史叙述。通过对提拉克、安贝德卡尔、帕特尔等政治人物的观点进行介绍和比较,卡皮拉强调了有必要超越自由主义、社会主义和马克思主义的话语,去理解印度政治思想是如何被博爱、暴力和主权问题所占据的。卡皮拉将这些时代的政治演员转变为政治思想家,展示了她作品中的主角是如何进入印度和全球政界并与之交往的,从而引起了人们对次大陆背景下政治思想复杂性的关注。对印度向独立过渡的发展的背景知识是那些试图参与卡皮拉论点的人的先决条件。尽管如此,Kapila的书将会引起对探索现代印度历史的传统叙述的替代方法感兴趣的学者的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vernacular English: reading the anglophone in postcolonial India
their own respective contexts, the extent to which each concentrated on or privileged violence over their brethren in the pursuit of sovereignty is surely up for debate. Fratricide may well have been a means to the end of sovereignty during the violence which followed partition in 1947, but the relevance of fratricide specifically, as opposed to mere enmity and anti-imperial resentment, to discourses of sovereignty in the decades which came before could perhaps be developed further. Furthermore, there remains a jarring absence in the book of South Indian contribution to the ‘Indian Age’ that lies at the bedrock of Kapila’s thesis. While a small piece on Tamil revolutionary VVS Aiyar features in the second chapter, the focus on actors and regions attached to the northern expanses of the subcontinent does seem to somewhat weaken the general geographical applicability of what is otherwise a novel, hard-hitting thesis. Drawing inspiration from recent histories of the British Empire and from a wide variety of source material, Kapila’s wide-ranging exploration nonetheless makes for a gripping historical account of Indian intellectual thought during the later colonial period. Presenting and comparing the ideas of political figures from Tilak to Ambedkar to Patel, Kapila highlights the need to journey beyond the discourses of liberalism, socialism, and Marxism to understand how Indian political thought came to be preoccupied by questions of fraternity, violence, and sovereignty. Turning these political actors of the age into political thinkers, Kapila demonstrates how the protagonists of her work moved in and engaged with both Indian and global political circles and so calls attention to the intricacies of political thought within a subcontinental context. Background knowledge of the developments in India’s transition to independence is a prerequisite for those who seek to engage with Kapila’s argument. Nevertheless, Kapila’s book will be of interest to scholars interested in exploring alternatives to traditional accounts of modern Indian history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信