数字产品的多设备消费:基于捆绑的最佳产品线设计

IF 5.9 2区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
H. Bhargava
{"title":"数字产品的多设备消费:基于捆绑的最佳产品线设计","authors":"H. Bhargava","doi":"10.1080/07421222.2023.2229122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A contemporary business challenge for bundling theory is the distribution of digital content such as media, entertainment, software, and other information goods. Consumers can use a number of devices to interact with software, online services, music, video, news, and other forms of digital content. For instance, Netflix videos and Kindle ebooks, initially accessed only on television sets and computers, respectively, are now also consumed on smartphones and tablets. Print products are now distributed and consumed both in print and digitally. Firms offer product line designs that include prices for single device access as also bundle discounts for multi-device access, so that consumers can choose a device or even multiple devices. This paper provides guidelines regarding such multi-device product line design and pricing. A starting point is to note that there are many ways to practice bundling, from offering prices for single-device consumption as well as a bundle discount (mixed bundling), to forcing multi-device prices (pure bundling), and designs in between (partial bundling). Picking the best design, and associated prices, is a complex problem due to how single-device demand functions relate to multi-device demand. Recognizing that some dual-device purchases can occur even when there is no bundle discount, the paper develops intuition around the net gain or loss incurred from giving a bundle discount to entice single-device access buyers to dual sales. One surprising finding is that inducing dual sales through bundle discounts can be profitable even when intent to consume multiple times is quite weak, because in this case dual sales would not occur organically. Less surprisingly, such inducement is also profitable when multi-consumption intent is strong, and least attractive when the intent is moderate. When one of the devices is an emerging one or has weak own demand in the short term, then it can be useful to offer a partial bundle, tying sales for the stronger device into a bundle comprising access to both devices. When device valuations are such that consumers generally agree on the rank-ordering of the devices (e.g., if a location-based app offers greater value on a smartphone than on a tablet), then it is best to employ some type of bundling, unless the intent for multi-device consumption is proportionally lower among low-value consumers than for high-value consumers.","PeriodicalId":50154,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Information Systems","volume":"40 1","pages":"724 - 751"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-Device Consumption of Digital Goods: Optimal Product Line Design with Bundling\",\"authors\":\"H. Bhargava\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07421222.2023.2229122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT A contemporary business challenge for bundling theory is the distribution of digital content such as media, entertainment, software, and other information goods. Consumers can use a number of devices to interact with software, online services, music, video, news, and other forms of digital content. For instance, Netflix videos and Kindle ebooks, initially accessed only on television sets and computers, respectively, are now also consumed on smartphones and tablets. Print products are now distributed and consumed both in print and digitally. Firms offer product line designs that include prices for single device access as also bundle discounts for multi-device access, so that consumers can choose a device or even multiple devices. This paper provides guidelines regarding such multi-device product line design and pricing. A starting point is to note that there are many ways to practice bundling, from offering prices for single-device consumption as well as a bundle discount (mixed bundling), to forcing multi-device prices (pure bundling), and designs in between (partial bundling). Picking the best design, and associated prices, is a complex problem due to how single-device demand functions relate to multi-device demand. Recognizing that some dual-device purchases can occur even when there is no bundle discount, the paper develops intuition around the net gain or loss incurred from giving a bundle discount to entice single-device access buyers to dual sales. One surprising finding is that inducing dual sales through bundle discounts can be profitable even when intent to consume multiple times is quite weak, because in this case dual sales would not occur organically. Less surprisingly, such inducement is also profitable when multi-consumption intent is strong, and least attractive when the intent is moderate. When one of the devices is an emerging one or has weak own demand in the short term, then it can be useful to offer a partial bundle, tying sales for the stronger device into a bundle comprising access to both devices. When device valuations are such that consumers generally agree on the rank-ordering of the devices (e.g., if a location-based app offers greater value on a smartphone than on a tablet), then it is best to employ some type of bundling, unless the intent for multi-device consumption is proportionally lower among low-value consumers than for high-value consumers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Management Information Systems\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"724 - 751\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Management Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2023.2229122\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2023.2229122","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

捆绑销售理论面临的当代商业挑战是数字内容(如媒体、娱乐、软件和其他信息产品)的分销。消费者可以使用许多设备与软件、在线服务、音乐、视频、新闻和其他形式的数字内容进行交互。例如,Netflix视频和Kindle电子书最初分别只能在电视机和电脑上观看,现在也可以在智能手机和平板电脑上观看。印刷产品现在以印刷和数字两种方式分发和消费。公司提供的产品线设计既包括单设备接入的价格,也包括多设备接入的捆绑折扣,这样消费者就可以选择一种设备,甚至多种设备。本文为这种多设备产品线的设计和定价提供了指导方针。首先要注意的是,有许多方法可以实现捆绑,从提供单设备消费价格和捆绑折扣(混合捆绑),到强制多设备价格(纯捆绑),以及介于两者之间的设计(部分捆绑)。由于单设备需求功能与多设备需求之间的关系,选择最佳设计和相关价格是一个复杂的问题。认识到即使在没有捆绑折扣的情况下,一些双设备购买也可能发生,本文对提供捆绑折扣以吸引单设备接入买家进行双重销售所产生的净收益或损失产生了直觉。一个令人惊讶的发现是,通过捆绑折扣诱导双重销售即使在多次消费的意图相当弱的情况下也是有利可图的,因为在这种情况下,双重销售不会有机地发生。不足为奇的是,当多重消费意图强烈时,这种诱导也是有利可图的,而当多重消费意图温和时,这种诱导就不那么吸引人了。当其中一款设备是新兴设备或短期内自身需求较弱时,提供部分捆绑销售可能是有用的,将较强设备的销售捆绑到包含两种设备的捆绑销售中。当设备估值达到消费者普遍认同设备的排名顺序时(例如,如果基于位置的应用在智能手机上比在平板电脑上提供更高的价值),那么最好采用某种类型的捆绑,除非低价值消费者的多设备消费意愿比例低于高价值消费者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-Device Consumption of Digital Goods: Optimal Product Line Design with Bundling
ABSTRACT A contemporary business challenge for bundling theory is the distribution of digital content such as media, entertainment, software, and other information goods. Consumers can use a number of devices to interact with software, online services, music, video, news, and other forms of digital content. For instance, Netflix videos and Kindle ebooks, initially accessed only on television sets and computers, respectively, are now also consumed on smartphones and tablets. Print products are now distributed and consumed both in print and digitally. Firms offer product line designs that include prices for single device access as also bundle discounts for multi-device access, so that consumers can choose a device or even multiple devices. This paper provides guidelines regarding such multi-device product line design and pricing. A starting point is to note that there are many ways to practice bundling, from offering prices for single-device consumption as well as a bundle discount (mixed bundling), to forcing multi-device prices (pure bundling), and designs in between (partial bundling). Picking the best design, and associated prices, is a complex problem due to how single-device demand functions relate to multi-device demand. Recognizing that some dual-device purchases can occur even when there is no bundle discount, the paper develops intuition around the net gain or loss incurred from giving a bundle discount to entice single-device access buyers to dual sales. One surprising finding is that inducing dual sales through bundle discounts can be profitable even when intent to consume multiple times is quite weak, because in this case dual sales would not occur organically. Less surprisingly, such inducement is also profitable when multi-consumption intent is strong, and least attractive when the intent is moderate. When one of the devices is an emerging one or has weak own demand in the short term, then it can be useful to offer a partial bundle, tying sales for the stronger device into a bundle comprising access to both devices. When device valuations are such that consumers generally agree on the rank-ordering of the devices (e.g., if a location-based app offers greater value on a smartphone than on a tablet), then it is best to employ some type of bundling, unless the intent for multi-device consumption is proportionally lower among low-value consumers than for high-value consumers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Management Information Systems
Journal of Management Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Management Information Systems is a widely recognized forum for the presentation of research that advances the practice and understanding of organizational information systems. It serves those investigating new modes of information delivery and the changing landscape of information policy making, as well as practitioners and executives managing the information resource.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信