加利福尼亚保护区周边高海拔边界的干扰和入侵植物发生

IF 1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ECOLOGY
Natalie Otto, M. Brunson, Clare E. Aslan
{"title":"加利福尼亚保护区周边高海拔边界的干扰和入侵植物发生","authors":"Natalie Otto, M. Brunson, Clare E. Aslan","doi":"10.3375/22-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Protected areas rarely are large enough to encompass the ecological processes that affect them. Accordingly, some authors call for cooperative management of multiple jurisdictions within protected area-centered ecosystems (PACEs) to sustain landscape-scale processes and maximize connectivity and ecosystem service flows. However, over time, differing land use and disturbance histories between adjoining jurisdictions may lead to divergence in plant community composition or structure along administrative boundaries, thus reducing landscape connectivity within PACEs. We tested this hypothesis by measuring evidence of human disturbance and occurrence of nonnative plant species along boundaries between protected areas and multiple-use lands in the California PACEs surrounding Lassen Volcanic and Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks. Invasive plants were found in about half of sampled units at Sequoia & Kings Canyon, but occurrence was rare at Lassen Volcanic and above 2000 m in both PACEs. We found no significant differences in invasive plant occurrence or human disturbance along boundaries between adjoining jurisdictions, and correlations between disturbance and invasive plant detections were not significant except in U.S. Forest Service non-wilderness lands. The overall low rate of detection in this study limited the power of statistical tests, and may be largely due to the high average elevation of sampling locations. Cooperative invasive plant management already occurs at times within these PACEs, and its continued use may be useful for maintaining a relatively invader-free environment under future conditions.","PeriodicalId":49780,"journal":{"name":"Natural Areas Journal","volume":"43 1","pages":"72 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disturbance and Invasive Plant Occurrence along High-Elevation Boundaries Surrounding California Protected Areas\",\"authors\":\"Natalie Otto, M. Brunson, Clare E. Aslan\",\"doi\":\"10.3375/22-15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Protected areas rarely are large enough to encompass the ecological processes that affect them. Accordingly, some authors call for cooperative management of multiple jurisdictions within protected area-centered ecosystems (PACEs) to sustain landscape-scale processes and maximize connectivity and ecosystem service flows. However, over time, differing land use and disturbance histories between adjoining jurisdictions may lead to divergence in plant community composition or structure along administrative boundaries, thus reducing landscape connectivity within PACEs. We tested this hypothesis by measuring evidence of human disturbance and occurrence of nonnative plant species along boundaries between protected areas and multiple-use lands in the California PACEs surrounding Lassen Volcanic and Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks. Invasive plants were found in about half of sampled units at Sequoia & Kings Canyon, but occurrence was rare at Lassen Volcanic and above 2000 m in both PACEs. We found no significant differences in invasive plant occurrence or human disturbance along boundaries between adjoining jurisdictions, and correlations between disturbance and invasive plant detections were not significant except in U.S. Forest Service non-wilderness lands. The overall low rate of detection in this study limited the power of statistical tests, and may be largely due to the high average elevation of sampling locations. Cooperative invasive plant management already occurs at times within these PACEs, and its continued use may be useful for maintaining a relatively invader-free environment under future conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Areas Journal\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"72 - 77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Areas Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3375/22-15\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Areas Journal","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3375/22-15","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保护区很少大到足以涵盖对其产生影响的生态过程。因此,一些作者呼吁在以保护区为中心的生态系统(pace)内对多个管辖权进行合作管理,以维持景观尺度的过程,并最大限度地提高连通性和生态系统服务流。然而,随着时间的推移,相邻管辖区之间不同的土地利用和干扰历史可能导致行政边界沿线植物群落组成或结构的差异,从而降低pace内景观的连通性。我们通过测量人类干扰的证据和非本土植物物种的发生,来检验这一假设,这些物种位于加州拉森火山公园和红杉和国王峡谷国家公园周围的保护区和多用途土地之间的边界。红杉和国王峡谷约有一半的取样单元存在入侵植物,而拉森火山和两处海拔2000 m以上的取样单元很少有入侵植物。我们发现,在相邻司法管辖区的边界上,入侵植物的发生或人为干扰没有显著差异,干扰与入侵植物检测之间的相关性不显著,除了美国林务局的非荒野土地。本研究的总体低检出率限制了统计检验的能力,这可能主要是由于采样地点的平均海拔高。合作性入侵植物管理已经在这些pace中出现,其继续使用可能有助于在未来条件下维持相对无入侵的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disturbance and Invasive Plant Occurrence along High-Elevation Boundaries Surrounding California Protected Areas
ABSTRACT Protected areas rarely are large enough to encompass the ecological processes that affect them. Accordingly, some authors call for cooperative management of multiple jurisdictions within protected area-centered ecosystems (PACEs) to sustain landscape-scale processes and maximize connectivity and ecosystem service flows. However, over time, differing land use and disturbance histories between adjoining jurisdictions may lead to divergence in plant community composition or structure along administrative boundaries, thus reducing landscape connectivity within PACEs. We tested this hypothesis by measuring evidence of human disturbance and occurrence of nonnative plant species along boundaries between protected areas and multiple-use lands in the California PACEs surrounding Lassen Volcanic and Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks. Invasive plants were found in about half of sampled units at Sequoia & Kings Canyon, but occurrence was rare at Lassen Volcanic and above 2000 m in both PACEs. We found no significant differences in invasive plant occurrence or human disturbance along boundaries between adjoining jurisdictions, and correlations between disturbance and invasive plant detections were not significant except in U.S. Forest Service non-wilderness lands. The overall low rate of detection in this study limited the power of statistical tests, and may be largely due to the high average elevation of sampling locations. Cooperative invasive plant management already occurs at times within these PACEs, and its continued use may be useful for maintaining a relatively invader-free environment under future conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Natural Areas Journal
Natural Areas Journal 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Natural Areas Journal is the flagship publication of the Natural Areas Association is the leading voice in natural areas management and preservation. The Journal features peer-reviewed original research articles on topics such as: -Applied conservation biology- Ecological restoration- Natural areas management- Ecological assessment and monitoring- Invasive and exotic species management- Habitat protection- Fire ecology. It also includes writing on conservation issues, forums, topic reviews, editorials, state and federal natural area activities and book reviews. In addition, we publish special issues on various topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信