与标准交叉配型单位相比,输血填充红细胞扩展表型匹配Rh和Kell抗原的血液肿瘤患者的红细胞同种免疫

Kiran Rajeev T, Ashish Jain, Neelam Marwaha, Gaurav Prakash, Ratti Ram Sharma
{"title":"与标准交叉配型单位相比,输血填充红细胞扩展表型匹配Rh和Kell抗原的血液肿瘤患者的红细胞同种免疫","authors":"Kiran Rajeev T,&nbsp;Ashish Jain,&nbsp;Neelam Marwaha,&nbsp;Gaurav Prakash,&nbsp;Ratti Ram Sharma","doi":"10.1111/voxs.12642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>There is limited evidence regarding the advantage of transfusing extended phenotype-matched (EPM) packed red blood cells (PRBCs) to prevent alloimmunization in haemato-oncology patients. This randomized control trial aimed to determine the alloimmunization in haemato-oncology patients transfused with PRBCs which are EPM for Rh (C, E, c, e) and Kell (K) antigens (group I) versus those receiving standard compatible PRBCs (group II).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients having a negative antibody screen (ABS), direct antiglobulin test (DAT) and autologous control (AC) were randomly allocated to either group I or II (<i>n</i> = 50 each). A follow-up (FU) testing post-transfusion was conducted for haemoglobin (Hb), ABS and DAT at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months. ABS was conducted using fully automated immunohaematology analyser, while DAT, compatibility testing and extended phenotyping were conducted manually using column agglutination technique.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to mean (±SD) Hb at initial enrolment (group I, 5·06 ± 1·29 g/dl and group II, 5·41 ± 1·37 g/dl; <i>P</i> = 0·179), age (40 ± 17·3 years v/s 42·2 ± 17·2 years; <i>P</i> = 0·523), gender (<i>P</i> = 0·835) and diagnosis (<i>P</i> = 0·06). All patients in group I and II had negative ABS, DAT and AC at all three FUs. Group II patients were transfused more PRBCs (372 v/s 187, <i>P</i> = 0·000), while the mean Hb increment between successive FU was significant in both the groups (<i>P</i> = 0·003).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>It appears that there is no added benefit of providing EPM PRBCs in haemato-oncology patients, as none developed RBC alloantibodies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":89948,"journal":{"name":"ISBT science series","volume":"16 4","pages":"307-314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/voxs.12642","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Red cell alloimmunization in haemato-oncology patients transfused with packed red blood cells extended phenotype matched for Rh and Kell antigens versus the standard crossmatched units\",\"authors\":\"Kiran Rajeev T,&nbsp;Ashish Jain,&nbsp;Neelam Marwaha,&nbsp;Gaurav Prakash,&nbsp;Ratti Ram Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/voxs.12642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is limited evidence regarding the advantage of transfusing extended phenotype-matched (EPM) packed red blood cells (PRBCs) to prevent alloimmunization in haemato-oncology patients. This randomized control trial aimed to determine the alloimmunization in haemato-oncology patients transfused with PRBCs which are EPM for Rh (C, E, c, e) and Kell (K) antigens (group I) versus those receiving standard compatible PRBCs (group II).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients having a negative antibody screen (ABS), direct antiglobulin test (DAT) and autologous control (AC) were randomly allocated to either group I or II (<i>n</i> = 50 each). A follow-up (FU) testing post-transfusion was conducted for haemoglobin (Hb), ABS and DAT at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months. ABS was conducted using fully automated immunohaematology analyser, while DAT, compatibility testing and extended phenotyping were conducted manually using column agglutination technique.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to mean (±SD) Hb at initial enrolment (group I, 5·06 ± 1·29 g/dl and group II, 5·41 ± 1·37 g/dl; <i>P</i> = 0·179), age (40 ± 17·3 years v/s 42·2 ± 17·2 years; <i>P</i> = 0·523), gender (<i>P</i> = 0·835) and diagnosis (<i>P</i> = 0·06). All patients in group I and II had negative ABS, DAT and AC at all three FUs. Group II patients were transfused more PRBCs (372 v/s 187, <i>P</i> = 0·000), while the mean Hb increment between successive FU was significant in both the groups (<i>P</i> = 0·003).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>It appears that there is no added benefit of providing EPM PRBCs in haemato-oncology patients, as none developed RBC alloantibodies.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISBT science series\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"307-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/voxs.12642\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISBT science series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/voxs.12642\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISBT science series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/voxs.12642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于输注扩展表型匹配(EPM)填充的红细胞(PRBCs)预防血液肿瘤患者同种免疫的优势,证据有限。这项随机对照试验旨在确定输注PRBCs的血液肿瘤患者的同种免疫,PRBCs是Rh(C,E,C,E)和Kell(K)抗原的EPM(I组),而接受标准相容性PRBCs(II组)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Red cell alloimmunization in haemato-oncology patients transfused with packed red blood cells extended phenotype matched for Rh and Kell antigens versus the standard crossmatched units

Background and Objectives

There is limited evidence regarding the advantage of transfusing extended phenotype-matched (EPM) packed red blood cells (PRBCs) to prevent alloimmunization in haemato-oncology patients. This randomized control trial aimed to determine the alloimmunization in haemato-oncology patients transfused with PRBCs which are EPM for Rh (C, E, c, e) and Kell (K) antigens (group I) versus those receiving standard compatible PRBCs (group II).

Materials and Methods

Patients having a negative antibody screen (ABS), direct antiglobulin test (DAT) and autologous control (AC) were randomly allocated to either group I or II (n = 50 each). A follow-up (FU) testing post-transfusion was conducted for haemoglobin (Hb), ABS and DAT at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months. ABS was conducted using fully automated immunohaematology analyser, while DAT, compatibility testing and extended phenotyping were conducted manually using column agglutination technique.

Results

There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to mean (±SD) Hb at initial enrolment (group I, 5·06 ± 1·29 g/dl and group II, 5·41 ± 1·37 g/dl; P = 0·179), age (40 ± 17·3 years v/s 42·2 ± 17·2 years; P = 0·523), gender (P = 0·835) and diagnosis (P = 0·06). All patients in group I and II had negative ABS, DAT and AC at all three FUs. Group II patients were transfused more PRBCs (372 v/s 187, P = 0·000), while the mean Hb increment between successive FU was significant in both the groups (P = 0·003).

Conclusion

It appears that there is no added benefit of providing EPM PRBCs in haemato-oncology patients, as none developed RBC alloantibodies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信